Supreme

One of the Supreme Court’s very first actions after Republicans gained a 6-3 supermajority on its bench was a revolutionary decision expanding religious institutions’ right to seek exemptions from state laws. Since then, the Court has fairly consistently favored Christian litigants who seek such exemptions, or who raise other religious liberty-related claims (though it has

A court case that could create a ‘two strikes and you’re out’ precedent on late payments is set to head to the Supreme Court. In August, a Court of Appeal judge ruled that contractor Providence Building Services Ltd was within its rights to terminate a contract with Hexagon Housing Association Ltd (Hexagon). Hexagon had failed

Bitcoin Home » Bitcoin » Supreme Court clears path for US to sell $4.4 billion in seized Silk Road Bitcoin by Estefano Gomez Oct. 7, 2024 The Supreme Court's decision allows the US to sell 69,370 seized Silk Road Bitcoin, setting up one of the largest Bitcoin auctions in history. Key Takeaways Supreme Court paves

Science & Nature Anna Moneymaker/Getty ImagesIn the 7-2 ruling, the Supreme Court preserved access to mifepristone—the most widely used abortion medication in the United...

The nation’s highest court paused a lower court’s decision to nullify approval of the abortion drug mifepristone, keeping the medication available while an appeal...

DOJ and drugmaker ask Supreme Court to block abortion pill ruling  NBC NewsJustice Department to take abortion pill fight to Supreme Court: Garland  ABC11Justice Department asks Supreme Court to intervene in abortion drug ruling  CNNThe abortion pill issue isn’t going away for Republicans any time soon  The IndependentBiden administration asks Supreme Court to block limits on abortion pill use  CNBCView

The Supreme Court elected not to overturn a ruling allowing a 12-year-old transgender track-and-field athlete to compete against other girls...

The Supreme Court could soon redefine the rules of the internet as we know it. This week, the court will hear two cases, Gonzalez v. Google and Twitter v. Taamneh, that give it an opportunity to drastically change the rules of speech online. Both cases deal with how online platforms have handled terrorist content. And