Football <\/p>\n
Following the Lubbock County, Texas, court ruling, where Brendan Sorsby is permitted to play for the Red Raiders next season despite the betting controversy, a lot of debate has been ongoing in college football. Texas Tech has shown its full support to the QB, shutting down all criticism, but the Big 12 Conference leaders and several teams are considering boycotts and conference discipline against the program.<\/p>\n
Watch What\u2019s Trending Now!<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
However, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sent a formal letter, warning the Big 12 conference that any attempt to sanction Texas Tech over its support of Sorsby will be met with immediate legal action, as reported by Justin Williams on June 11, 2026.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe are aware that the Big 12 is considering invoking Bylaw 3.6 of the Big 12\u2019s Bylaws to sanction Texas Tech for respecting the Order and continuing its support of Mr. Sorsby as a student-athlete. This letter serves to notify the Big 12 that any such action would be unlawful and would expose the Conference to substantial liability,\u201d read the formal letter sent by Paxton, obtained by The Athletic.<\/em><\/p>\n \u201cAny sanction against Texas Tech for acting consistent with the Order would be a per se violation of federal and state antitrust laws, a naked horizontal agreement among competitors to disadvantage Texas Tech by cutting off access to the resources it needs to compete.\u201d<\/p>\n While the State of Texas is ready to shield Texas Tech\u2019s athletic department from retribution, the rival programs and the Big 12 argue that allowing Brendan Sorsby to play will destroy the competitive integrity following his admission of placing over 9,000 impermissible bets.<\/p>\n The office of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sent a letter to the Big 12 on behalf of Texas Tech and obtained by @TheAthletic<\/a>.<\/p>\n It states that any sanctions against Texas Tech over the Brendan Sorsby situation would be treated as \u201cunlawful\u201d and would lead to legal action. pic.twitter.com\/dDo72Uz8vs<\/a><\/p>\n \u2014 Justin Williams (@Williams_Justin) June 11, 2026<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n Georgia AD Josh Brooks stated that programs \u201ccannot in good conscience\u201d put their own players on a field where the fairness of the competition is compromised. Then Kansas State AD Gene Taylor went further, questioning what sports integrity even means if a player is allowed to play after betting on their own team.<\/p>\n After all the criticism from analysts and rival programs, Texas Tech\u2019s AD also made a statement.<\/p>\n \u201cI\u2019ve heard the word \u2018integrity\u2019 used a great deal in the last 48 hours. As someone who has dedicated his career to college sports, I, too, believe integrity is central to our industry\u2019s success,\u201d wrote Texas Tech AD Kirby Hocutt, releasing a defiant official statement. \u201cI also think integrity applies on more than one front. The integrity of sport matters. So does the integrity of how we treat a 22-year-old who sought help, entered residential treatment, and is working every day toward recovery. Those two things don\u2019t have to be in conflict.\u201d<\/p>\n Brendan Sorsby placed 40 bets on Indiana in 2022, when he was a redshirt freshman. After investigations, the NCAA decided to make him permanently ineligible. However, the Texas court granted a temporary injunction with a self-proposed two-game suspension, overriding the organization and ruling that Sorsby would suffer \u201cimminent and irreparable injury.\u201d<\/p>\n The QB\u2019s legal team argued that the NCAA weaponized Sorsby\u2019s medically diagnosed gambling addiction following his 35-day inpatient rehab program. But allowing the QB following his gambling scandal only shows how broken the system is, with a weakened control of the NCAA being the main concern. And if Texas Tech faces no repercussions, it creates a blueprint for the future, believe the conference leaders.\u00a0Even ESPN\u2019s Chris Fowler also worried<\/a> about CFB\u2019s future after Brendan Sorsby\u2019s court ruling.<\/p>\n Under the NCAA\u2019s strict sports-wager rule, betting on one\u2019s own team led to a permanent ban in college. But in Brendan Sorsby\u2019s case, a state court\u2019s rule erased it, revealing the chaotic landscape of college athletics, where the NCAA is unable to enforce its own rule without a court appeal. While that situation sparked national outrage, U.S. Senator from Texas, Ted Cruz, isn\u2019t ready to buy the court decision<\/a>.<\/p>\n \u201cThe judicial decision was mind-blowing. It\u2019s hard to find something that illustrates more powerfully how broken the system is,\u201d said Cruz, as reported by Yahoo Sports\u2019 Ross Dellenger on June 10.<\/p>\n The major concern for which Sorsby faces heat, his win against the NCAA, signals that there is no rule in college athletics.<\/p>\n \u201cCollege football is so rife with upsets,\u201d said ESPN\u2019s Chris Fowler on The Rich Eisen Show. \u201c\u2026 Gambling is a pretty serious thing; you should be taken really seriously by anybody who\u2019s in charge.\u201d<\/p>\n The NCAA appealed the injunction decision. However, a permanent resolution is expected to take some time due to the complex nature of the situation. A court date for the full case of Sorsby vs NCAA is scheduled for February 8, 2027. Sorsby, on the other hand, only has a temporary injunction and is not yet completely free. The NCAA will try to battle to the very end as it would not want this to be the precedent if an incident like this happens in the future.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n
Football Brendan Sorsby\u2019s injunction raises questions<\/h2>\n