{"id":904967,"date":"2026-05-11T06:13:51","date_gmt":"2026-05-11T11:13:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/2026\/05\/11\/banking-lobby-tries-to-kill-clarity-act-four-days-before-senate-vote\/"},"modified":"2026-05-11T06:13:51","modified_gmt":"2026-05-11T11:13:51","slug":"banking-lobby-tries-to-kill-clarity-act-four-days-before-senate-vote","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/2026\/05\/11\/banking-lobby-tries-to-kill-clarity-act-four-days-before-senate-vote\/","title":{"rendered":"Banking Lobby Tries to Kill CLARITY Act Four Days Before Senate Vote"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n
\"CLARITY<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Four days before the Senate Banking Committee votes on the CLARITY Act, major banking trade groups have submitted a joint letter demanding changes to a stablecoin yield compromise they had already accepted.<\/p>\n

The American Bankers Association, Bank Policy Institute, and three other major banking lobbies sent the letter <\/a>to Senate Banking Committee leadership after the markup vote was officially scheduled for May 14. The timing is deliberate. The Memorial Day recess begins May 21. If the bill does not clear committee before then, it gets pushed off the Senate calendar entirely and a full year of negotiations resets to zero.<\/p>\n

What the Compromise Actually Said<\/strong><\/h3>\n

The bipartisan compromise reached on May 1 by Senators Thom Tillis and Angela Alsobrooks was straightforward. Crypto companies cannot pay passive yield on stablecoins the way a bank pays interest on deposits. However, rewards tied to actual usage, transactions, and platform activity remain permitted.<\/p>\n

Banks agreed to this framework. Then the Senate Banking Committee scheduled the May 14 markup. Within days, the same banking groups submitted a letter demanding the entire rewards framework be scrapped.<\/p>\n

What Banks Are Really Worried About<\/strong><\/h3>\n

The banking lobby\u2019s stated concern is consumer protection. Their actual concern is competition. Banking groups have explicitly said in their own communications that yield-bearing stablecoins could reduce consumer, small business, and farm loans by 20% or more.\u00a0<\/p>\n

If consumers move money from bank accounts into crypto platforms offering activity-based rewards, banks have less capital to lend and less profit to generate. That is a competitive threat, not a consumer protection argument.<\/p>\n

Trump Pushes Back<\/strong><\/h3>\n

President Trump has publicly stated he will not allow bankers to derail the bill. A Senate aide who reviewed the banking lobby letter described it as \u201cpretty milquetoast,\u201d adding that committee members have already moved past the yield debate and are focused on wrapping up remaining issues around ethics provisions.<\/p>\n

What Happens Next<\/strong><\/h3>\n

The May 14 markup vote is still on. The July 4 deadline for the President\u2019s signature remains the White House target. But the banking lobby\u2019s last minute intervention is a deliberate attempt to introduce enough friction to blow past the Memorial Day deadline.<\/p>\n

If the committee holds firm and advances the bill on Thursday, the path to July 4 stays open. If the lobbying effort succeeds in reopening the yield debate, the entire legislative effort risks collapsing before it reaches the Senate floor.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Was this writing helpful?<\/h3>\n