![\"music](\"https:\/\/www.digitalmusicnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Dario-Amodei-1024x546.png\" "\\"music\\"")
<\/p>\n
Anthropic co-founder and CEO Dario Amodei. Photo Credit: TechCrunch<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Music Anthropic is grappling with another massive infringement lawsuit \u2013 this time from BMG, which has accused the AI giant of running \u201croughshod over the rights of countless creatives and rightsholders.\u201d<\/strong><\/h2>\nBMG submitted its nearly 50-page complaint to a California federal court yesterday, about seven weeks after Universal Music and Concord fired off a sweeping suit<\/a> of their own. The latter dramatically expanded on a prior Anthropic action from the same parties and, in brief, introduced multiple arguments.<\/p>\nAnd those distinct arguments didn\u2019t come out of left field. Rather, recent years\u2019 AI complaints, levied by music rightsholders, artists<\/a>, authors, and others, effectively produced something of a guide for spearheading copyright litigation against leading developers.<\/p>\nNo longer focused solely on LLMs\u2019 training processes \u2013 and less likely to dedicate page after page to verbose descriptions thereof \u2013 plaintiffs are now zeroing in on how their protected works were allegedly pirated, copied, modified, incorporated into outputs, and used to generate revenue.<\/p>\n
Enter BMG\u2019s monster-complaint<\/a>, which hits all these bases and more when calling out Anthropic\u2019s alleged \u201cpervasive infringement\u201d and alleged \u201cegregious law-breaking.\u201d <\/strong><\/h4>\nIn doing so, the suit doesn\u2019t abandon the unauthorized training allegation; Anthropic is accused of infringing on approximately 500 BMG compositions<\/a> to train Claude.<\/p>\n\u201cThat Claude has been capable of generating and has generated outputs of nearly exact replicas of BMG\u2019s lyrics in response to prompts shows that Anthropic trained Claude on BMG\u2019s copyrighted musical compositions,\u201d the legal text reads.<\/p>\n
But the complaint also frames said outputs as evidence of separate infringement \u2013 \u201cClaude users have requested the lyrics to and received output from Claude containing all or significant portions of lyrics from BMG owned or controlled musical compositions,\u201d per the document.<\/p>\n
Then there\u2019s Anthropic\u2019s alleged copying-related infringement: \u201cAnthropic made and makes additional copies of BMG\u2019s copyrighted lyrics, without permission, when it cleans, processes, trains with, encodes with, and\/or finetunes the data input into Claude models, further violating BMG\u2019s copyrights.\u201d <\/strong><\/h4>\n
And those distinct arguments didn\u2019t come out of left field. Rather, recent years\u2019 AI complaints, levied by music rightsholders, artists<\/a>, authors, and others, effectively produced something of a guide for spearheading copyright litigation against leading developers.<\/p>\n No longer focused solely on LLMs\u2019 training processes \u2013 and less likely to dedicate page after page to verbose descriptions thereof \u2013 plaintiffs are now zeroing in on how their protected works were allegedly pirated, copied, modified, incorporated into outputs, and used to generate revenue.<\/p>\n In doing so, the suit doesn\u2019t abandon the unauthorized training allegation; Anthropic is accused of infringing on approximately 500 BMG compositions<\/a> to train Claude.<\/p>\n \u201cThat Claude has been capable of generating and has generated outputs of nearly exact replicas of BMG\u2019s lyrics in response to prompts shows that Anthropic trained Claude on BMG\u2019s copyrighted musical compositions,\u201d the legal text reads.<\/p>\n But the complaint also frames said outputs as evidence of separate infringement \u2013 \u201cClaude users have requested the lyrics to and received output from Claude containing all or significant portions of lyrics from BMG owned or controlled musical compositions,\u201d per the document.<\/p>\nEnter BMG\u2019s monster-complaint<\/a>, which hits all these bases and more when calling out Anthropic\u2019s alleged \u201cpervasive infringement\u201d and alleged \u201cegregious law-breaking.\u201d <\/strong><\/h4>\n
Then there\u2019s Anthropic\u2019s alleged copying-related infringement: \u201cAnthropic made and makes additional copies of BMG\u2019s copyrighted lyrics, without permission, when it cleans, processes, trains with, encodes with, and\/or finetunes the data input into Claude models, further violating BMG\u2019s copyrights.\u201d <\/strong><\/h4>\n