{"id":892152,"date":"2026-03-18T02:09:11","date_gmt":"2026-03-18T07:09:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/2026\/03\/18\/xrp-vs-chainlink-2026-ghost-chain-accusation-ripple-cto-response-and-the-full-debate-explained\/"},"modified":"2026-03-18T02:09:11","modified_gmt":"2026-03-18T07:09:11","slug":"xrp-vs-chainlink-2026-ghost-chain-accusation-ripple-cto-response-and-the-full-debate-explained","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/2026\/03\/18\/xrp-vs-chainlink-2026-ghost-chain-accusation-ripple-cto-response-and-the-full-debate-explained\/","title":{"rendered":"XRP vs Chainlink 2026: Ghost Chain Accusation, Ripple CTO Response, and the Full Debate Explained"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n
\"XRP<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
\n

The latest XRP vs LINK clash erupted after Zach Rynes<\/a> took direct aim at the XRP Ledger<\/a>, calling it an \u201cobsolete ghost chain.\u201d His remarks didn\u2019t stop there; he dismissed XRP\u2019s long-standing role as a global bridge asset and pointed to weak traction in tokenized assets, noting XRPL holds less than 1% of the RWA market and under 0.01% of stablecoin supply.<\/p>\n

This struck at the core of XRP\u2019s narrative, instantly triggering a strong reaction from its community and turning a long-standing rivalry into a fresh social media war.<\/p>\n

The situation intensified when Rynes linked XRP to Ripple\u2019s corporate strategy. Following Ripple\u2019s $750 million share buyback<\/a>, he argued that XRP sales are being used to fund company growth, acquisitions, and equity buybacks, raising questions about whether token holders gain from this structure.<\/p>\n

He framed it by saying: owning XRP may mean funding a company that prioritizes shareholders over token holders. That argument quickly spread across crypto Twitter and drew sharp reactions.<\/p>\n

XRP Voices Push Back Strongly<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Ripple CTO David Schwartz <\/a>responded by calling the criticism logically flawed. He reiterated that XRP sales are part of a long-term, pre-disclosed distribution strategy and added that price drops from such sales can allow investors to accumulate at lower levels.<\/p>\n

Attorney Bill Morgan<\/a> accused Rynes of having an \u201cunhealthy obsession with XRP,\u201d rejecting the narrative that XRP holders are sidelined in Ripple\u2019s growth.<\/p>\n

XRPL validator Vet <\/a>framed the backlash as frustration from the Chainlink side, while also defending XRPL\u2019s native order book and automated market maker features.<\/p>\n

Community voice xrpmickle<\/a> delivered one of the sharpest counterattacks, claiming LINK has no economic necessity. He argued that Chainlink\u2019s oracle network does not depend on the LINK token and called it \u201cETH-issued vaporware,\u201d stating that even if LINK disappeared, the network would continue operating.<\/p>\n