- \n
- Bitcoin ignored cooling CPI as capital rotated into gold, not crypto, reviving bear market fears<\/li>\n
- Long-term holders and mega whales reduce exposure, reinforcing post-October cycle exhaustion<\/li>\n
- $82,800 and $102,000 decide whether Bitcoin enters a bear market or delayed transition<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\n
Bitcoin has largely ignored what should have been supportive macro signals. US CPI cooled to 2.7% in December, strengthening rate-cut expectations, yet Bitcoin failed to respond. Instead of attracting fresh capital, the price stalled while money rotated elsewhere. <\/strong><\/p>\n
That disconnect is why the Bitcoin bear market discussion is resurfacing. <\/p>\n
Fidelity\u2019s Director of Global Macro, Jurrien Timmer, recently warned that Bitcoin may have already ended its latest four-year cycle in October, both in price and time. The on-chain and market data since then increasingly support that view.<\/p>\n
Data Signals Suggest Bitcoin May Already Be in a Bear Market<\/h2>\n
Multiple independent indicators now point to the same conclusion: capital is retreating, conviction holders are selling, and Bitcoin is absorbing risk<\/a> without real demand.<\/p>\n
Stablecoin Inflows Have Collapsed Since the Cycle Peak<\/h3>\n
Stablecoin inflows often act as dry powder for crypto rallies. That fuel has vanished.<\/p>\n
Sponsored<\/small><\/p>\n
Sponsored<\/small><\/p>\n
Total exchange inflows for ERC-20 stablecoins peaked at around 10.2 billion on August 14. By December 24, inflows had fallen to roughly 1.06 billion, a drop of nearly 90%.<\/p>\n
Want more token insights like this?\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya\u2019s Daily Crypto Newsletter\u00a0here<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n
Stablecoin Flows: CryptoQuant<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n That August inflow peak closely preceded Bitcoin\u2019s October high above $125,000, the same period Timmer identified as the likely cycle top. <\/p>\n
\n \n\n
While I remain a secular bull on Bitcoin, my concern is that Bitcoin may well have ended another 4-year cycle halving phase, both in price and time. If we visually line up all the bull markets (green) we can see that the October high of $125k after 145 months of rallying fits\u2026 pic.twitter.com\/Uxg9DTccnt<\/a><\/p>\n
\u2014 Jurrien Timmer (@TimmerFidelity) December 18, 2025<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n
Since then, fresh capital has failed to return, reinforcing the idea that distribution replaced accumulation after the peak.<\/p>\n
Long-Term Holders Have Turned Aggressive Sellers<\/h3>\n
Conviction holders are behaving differently after October.<\/p>\n
Bitcoin long-term holder net position change flipped negative shortly after the cycle high. Selling accelerated from roughly 16,500 BTC per day in late October to around 279,000 BTC recently. That is an increase of more than 1,500% in daily distribution pressure.<\/p>\n
Long-Term BTC Holders Dumping: Glassnode<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n This aligns directly with Timmer\u2019s thesis that the four-year halving cycle phase likely ended in October. Long-term holders appear to agree, reducing exposure rather than defending price.<\/p>\n
Bitcoin Dominance Is Rising, But Not for Bullish Reasons<\/h3>\n
Bitcoin dominance has climbed back toward 57\u201359%, but this is not a risk-on signal.<\/p>\n
BTC Dominance: CoinGecko<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n After the softer CPI print, capital did not rotate into Bitcoin. Instead, it flowed into traditional hedges. Over the past year, silver has rallied by over 120%, while gold is up roughly 65%. At the same time, broader crypto markets have lagged badly.<\/p>\n
\n \n\n
\nIf you invested $10,000 in each asset at the start of 2025, you\u2019d have:<\/p>\n
Silver \u2192 $23,000<\/p>\n
Gold \u2192 $16,500<\/p>\n
Copper \u2192 $13,500<\/p>\n
Nvidia \u2192 $13,450<\/p>\n
Nasdaq \u2192 $12,000<\/p>\n
S&P 500 \u2192 $11,600<\/p>\n
BTC \u2192 $9,400<\/p>\n
ETH \u2192 $8,800<\/p>\n
Altcoins \u2192 $5,800<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\u2014 Dirk \ud83d\udc8e (@DirksDegen) December 24, 2025<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n
This shift reinforces the idea that Bitcoin\u2019s rising dominance is not being driven by fresh risk appetite, but by capital retreating into relative safety within crypto.<\/p>\n
Sponsored<\/small><\/p>\n
Sponsored<\/small><\/p>\n
That view is echoed by an exclusive market comment shared with BeInCrypto by Ray Youssef, founder and CEO of NoOnes, who highlighted why gold has led the 2025 debasement trade while Bitcoin remains range-bound.<\/p>\n
\n
\u201cWhile gold may clearly be winning the 2025 debasement trade on price performance, the comparison masks a more nuanced market reality. Gold\u2019s recent run to new all-time highs and 67% YTD gains reflect classical defensive investor positioning as capital seeks certainty in a market environment defined by fiscal excess, geopolitical strain, and macro policy uncertainty. Increased central bank accumulation, a softer dollar, and persistent inflation risks have reinforced gold\u2019s role as the market\u2019s preferred defensive asset,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Youssef added that Bitcoin\u2019s behavior this year has diverged sharply from the digital-gold narrative.<\/strong><\/p>\n
\n
\u201cBitcoin, by contrast, has recently failed to deliver on the hedge narrative. The asset has not traded like digital gold in 2025, owing to its heightened sensitivity to macroeconomic factors. BTC\u2019s upside is now tied to liquidity expansion, sovereign policy clarity, and risk sentiment, rather than to monetary debasement alone,\u201d he highlighted.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Mega-Whale Addresses Are Quietly Declining<\/h3>\n
Large holders are also stepping back.<\/p>\n
The number of Bitcoin addresses holding more than 10,000 BTC has fallen from 92 in early December to 88. That decline came alongside falling prices, not accumulation.<\/p>\n
Mega BTC Whales Distributing: Glassnode<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n These addresses often represent institutional-scale players. Their reduction adds another layer of confirmation that smart money is not positioning aggressively for upside here.<\/p>\n
Bitcoin Remains Below a Critical Long-Term Moving Average<\/h3>\n
Bitcoin is still trading below its 365-day moving average<\/a> near $102,000, a level last decisively lost at the start of the 2022 bear market.<\/p>\n
This moving average acts as both technical and psychological support. Failure to reclaim it suggests the market has shifted from trend continuation to regime risk. If price remains below this level, historical precedent points toward deeper downside zones near the traders\u2019 realized price band around $72,000.<\/p>\n
\n \n\n
\nBitcoin is below its 365-day moving average ($102K), a key technical and psychological support level last broken at the start of the 2022 bear market.<\/p>\n
If price fails to reclaim it, data suggest the next support lies near $72K, the Traders\u2019 minimum realized price band. pic.twitter.com\/VySVce5NY9<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\u2014 CryptoQuant.com (@cryptoquant_com) November 5, 2025<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n
Taken together, these signals support Timmer\u2019s warning that Bitcoin may already be in a bear-market phase or closing in on that, even if the price has not fully reflected it yet. Capital has dried up, conviction holders are selling, dominance is rising defensively, and macro relief is being ignored.<\/p>\n
Sponsored<\/small><\/p>\n
Sponsored<\/small><\/p>\n
That said, not all long-term cycle supports have broken yet. Those counter-signals, and the exact levels that decide whether this becomes a full bear market or a prolonged transition<\/a>, come next.<\/p>\n
Bitcoins Why the Bitcoin Bear Market Case Is Not Fully Settled Yet<\/h2>\n
Despite the growing evidence pointing toward a Bitcoin bear market, two long-term cycle indicators still argue against a confirmed structural breakdown.<\/p>\n
Also, one reason the Bitcoin bear market case remains unresolved is how markets are interpreting the CPI slowdown. While cooling inflation typically benefits risk assets, the current response suggests investors are prioritizing safety and liquidity over growth.<\/p>\n
That does not mean the CPI signal is wrong. It may simply be early, with Bitcoin historically reacting later than traditional hedges once liquidity expectations fully translate into capital flows. <\/p>\n
These and the indicators we would discuss next do not negate the bearish signals discussed above. But they explain why this phase may still resolve as a prolonged transition rather than a full bear cycle.<\/p>\n
Pi Cycle Top Has Not Triggered<\/h3>\n
One of Bitcoin\u2019s most reliable cycle indicators, the Pi Cycle Top, has not flashed a peak signal. The indicator compares the 111-day moving average with the 350-day moving average multiplied by two.<\/p>\n
Historically, when these two lines cross, Bitcoin has been near or at major cycle tops.<\/p>\n
As of now, the two lines remain widely separated. That suggests Bitcoin is not in an overheated or euphoric phase, even after the October high.<\/p>\n
PI Cycle Top: Coinglass<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n This contradicts the idea raised by Fidelity\u2019s Director of Global Macro, Jurrien Timmer, who noted that the October peak near $125,000 fit prior cycle timing.<\/p>\n
In past cycles, true bear markets began after clear Pi Cycle confirmations. That signal is still absent.<\/p>\n
Sponsored<\/small><\/p>\n
Sponsored<\/small><\/p>\n
The 2-Year SMA Remains the Line That Matters Most<\/h3>\n
The second and more immediate counter-argument is structural. Bitcoin is still trading near its 2-year simple moving average, which sits around $82,800.<\/p>\n
This level has repeatedly acted as Bitcoin\u2019s long-term trend divider. Monthly closes above the 2-year SMA have historically marked cycle survival.<\/p>\n
Sustained closes below it have marked deep bear phases.<\/p>\n
So far, Bitcoin has not confirmed a monthly close beneath this line.<\/p>\n
That makes December\u2019s monthly close critical. If Bitcoin holds above $82,800 into year-end, the market likely remains in a late-cycle transition rather than a confirmed Bitcoin bear market.<\/a><\/p>\n
\n \n\n
\n\ud83d\udea8 Bitcoin in a critical zone on the 2Y SMA Multiplier<\/p>\n
The 2Y SMA Multiplier is one of Bitcoin\u2019s most respected cycle charts \u2014 and the current moment demands attention.<\/p>\n
\ud83d\udccd Today, BTC is trading very close to the 2Y SMA, currently at $82,800.<\/p>\n
\ud83d\udcc9 History matters:
Whenever\u2026 pic.twitter.com\/jmIW9RSSGg<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n\u2014 Alphractal (@Alphractal) December 16, 2025<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n
That outcome keeps open the possibility that 2026 reflects delayed upside rather than prolonged downside.<\/p>\n
However, if December closes decisively below the 2-year SMA<\/a>, downside projections toward the $65,000\u2013$75,000 range, referenced by Timmer, gain structural backing.<\/p>\n
TL;DR \u2014Key Bitcoin Price Levels To Watch Now<\/h3>\n
The bearish framework also has clear invalidation levels. A reclaim of the 365-day moving average near $102,000 would materially weaken the bear market thesis. That would align with Tom Lee\u2019s year-end Bitcoin price prediction.<\/a><\/p>\n
That level marked the start of the 2022 bear market when it broke, and would signal renewed trend strength if recovered.<\/p>\n
In simple terms:<\/p>\n
- \n
- Above $82,800 into December close: transition phase remains intact<\/li>\n
- Below $82,800 on a monthly basis: bear market risk escalates<\/li>\n
- Back above $102,000: bullish structure begins rebuilding<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
For now, Bitcoin sits between conviction selling and long-term cycle support. The market is not confirming strength, but it is not fully breaking either.<\/p>\n
The December close will decide which narrative carries into 2026.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\nDisclaimer<\/p>\n
\nIn line with the Trust Project<\/a> guidelines, this price analysis article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. BeInCrypto is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice. Always conduct your own research and consult with a professional before making any financial decisions. Please note that our Terms and Conditions<\/a>, Privacy Policy<\/a>, and Disclaimers<\/a> have been updated.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n