{"id":821363,"date":"2025-01-20T09:12:47","date_gmt":"2025-01-20T15:12:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/2025\/01\/20\/intel-arc-b580-review-late-arriving-still-welcome\/"},"modified":"2025-01-20T09:12:47","modified_gmt":"2025-01-20T15:12:47","slug":"intel-arc-b580-review-late-arriving-still-welcome","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/2025\/01\/20\/intel-arc-b580-review-late-arriving-still-welcome\/","title":{"rendered":"Intel Arc B580 review: Late arriving, still welcome"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

It\u2019s CPU-reliant and launches deep into a GPU generation, but this can still outpace the RTX 4060<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n \"The
\n <\/a>
\n
\nImage credit: Rock Paper Shotgun<\/cite>
\n <\/span>
\n <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

It\u2019s not being spelt out overtly, but there is a whiff of Intel\u2019s new Battlemage GPUs<\/a> being pitched as what the Alchemist generation should have been. Those eventually grew into their PCIe shoes<\/a>, but only after months of dial-shifting driver updates \u2013 whereas the flagship B580 promises Nvidia-besting games performance from the off. Even at such a stage in the current graphics generation (the GeForce RTX 5090 and RTX 5080 could be revealed literally tonight, at CES 2025), there is something enticing about that proposition.<\/p>\n

It helps, obviously, that the B580 isn\u2019t competing with the RTX 5090 or 5080, which will no doubt cost about the same as the amount of Faberg\u00e9 eggs you\u2019d need to crack to make an unpleasantly sharp wedding cake. Instead, and despite Intel\u2019s suggestion that it\u2019s a 1440p machine, the B580 is much more of a 1080p-bopping RTX 4060<\/a> rival. Here in the UK, its pricing range is more or less dead even with Nvidia\u2019s GPU, with the cheapest starting at \u00a3270 and Intel\u2019s own Limited Edition (on test here) costing \u00a3300. Stateside, it\u2019s even cheaper, with the Limited Edition only asking for $260 when most RTX 4060 models are sticking around $300.<\/p>\n

That minus-forty dollars also happens to pay for 4GB more VRAM than the 4060, the B580 packing 12GB of GDDR6. It still requires Resizeable BAR<\/a> to work properly, but the Battlemage architecture targets several weaknesses of Alchemist as well, tuning up its ray tracing<\/a> cores and no longer regarding DirectX 9 games with such a look of revulsion and fear. Which all sounds lovely \u2013 lord knows the world could do with more cheap-ish GPUs that aren\u2019t, like AMD\u2019s Radeon 7600<\/a>, kind of pointless.<\/p>\n

\n
\n\"The <\/a>
Image credit: Rock Paper Shotgun<\/cite><\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Intel Arc B580 review: 1440p benchmarks<\/h2>\n

In the actual running of games, however, getting the most out the Arc B580 isn\u2019t as simple as slapping on ReBAR. First, at Intel\u2019s preferred rez of 2560×1440, it managed only a somewhat decent-ish showing when paired with the RPS test rig\u2019s Core i5-11600K. With the exception of modest, single-digit framerate advantages in Metro Exodus<\/a> and F1 2022<\/a>, it performs near enough identically to the nearly two-year-old RTX 4060, even with all that bonus memory.<\/p>\n

\n
\n\"A <\/a>
Image credit: Rock Paper Shotgun<\/cite><\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Thing is, I\u2019ve been wanting to update our GPU benchmark process for ages, what with most of these games either being superseded by sequels or getting about as long in the tooth as the i5-11600K itself. I therefore decided to stop putting it off and try a refreshed system, with newer games and a PC based around the Core i9-13900K. Less of a representative-of-the-masses CPU, perhaps, but one that should be less prone to bottlenecking than the old i5.<\/p>\n

With this younger, faster processor to play off, the B580 turned its drawing performance against the RTX 4060 into a clean sweep victory:<\/p>\n

\n
\n\"A <\/a>
Image credit: Rock Paper Shotgun<\/cite><\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Look at it, shooting up from 3fps behind in Shadow of the Tomb Raider<\/a> (granted, with different anti-aliasing) to 12fps ahead. And in Metro Exodus, the RTX 4060 didn\u2019t benefit at all from the CPU upgrade, but the Arc B580 claimed another 5fps.<\/p>\n

Unlike the Radeon 7600, and for that matter most AMD GPUs, the B580 can also give Nvidia a run for their money on ray tracing. Running Cyberpunk 2077<\/a> on the upgraded rig with Psycho-level RT effects and max-quality upscaling, the Arc B580 averaged 39fps with XeSS \u2013 dead even with the RTX 4060 using DLSS. Flicking on Ultra-quality ray tracing in Metro Exodus also saw the Arc B850 keep its lead, scoring 52fps to the RTX 4060\u2019s 43fps. And that was without any upscaling help at all.<\/p>\n

Intel Arc B580 review: 1080p benchmarks<\/h2>\n

I\u2019m still not sure that the Arc B580 is the 1440p bargain that Intel say it is \u2013 it\u2019s clearly capable<\/em> at that resolution, but it\u2019s also just scraping 60fps in newer games, and for just an extra \u00a370 or so would get the much quicker RTX 4060 Ti. Down at 1080p, on the other hand, it\u2019s all smooth sailing, even if the RTX 4060 is often faster on the old test rig.<\/p>\n

\n
\n\"A <\/a>
Image credit: Rock Paper Shotgun<\/cite><\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

With the Core i9-13900K, though, it\u2019s another win for Battlemage, pulling multiple double-digit leads over the RTX 4060 and only falling slightly behind in Assassin\u2019s Creed Mirage.<\/p>\n

\n
\n\"A <\/a>
Image credit: Rock Paper Shotgun<\/cite><\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Again, there wasn\u2019t much daylight between the two in the ray-traced Cyberpunk 2077 test \u2013 the Arc B580 got 58fps, the RTX 4060 got 59fps \u2013 and with Ultra RT enabled in Metro Exodus, Intel\u2019s GPU remained faster, averaging 149fps to the GeForce\u2019s 142fps. Since F1 2024\u2019s Ultra High preset also enables ray tracing by default, it too shows that the Arc B580 can withstand the added strain without buckling.<\/p>\n

There\u2019s lots of good stuff here, even if you\u2019re not actively part-shopping, and just want to see something chip away at the one-party state that is contemporary graphics cards. Nvidia is no longer the only manufacturer that can do ray tracing well, and can no longer claim undisputedly to make the fastest sub-\u00a3300 card of the current generation \u2013 at native rez, anyway. Even the RTX 4060\u2019s excellent power efficiency doesn\u2019t go unchallenged: the Arc B580 would appear to be the loser here, with its 190W power draw rating and 600W PSU requirement dwarfing that of the 4060\u2019s 115W rating and 550W requirement. In practice, though, the highest I recorded the B580 drawing was just 118W, beating the 126W I saw on the 4060. This Limited Edition model runs cooler as well, typically staying around 63\u00b0c under load; its Nvidia rival flicked around 69-74\u00b0c range.<\/p>\n

Like I say, good stuff. However, the Arc B580\u2019s reliance on CPU brawn also means that personal perspective applies far more keenly than it would to the usual bar graph comparisons. Does this card do well to leverage newer CPU tech to eke out a performance advantage, or is it in fact yoked to the latest, most expensive chips in such a way that renders it a non-starter to those on older PCs?<\/p>\n

\n
\n\"The <\/a>
Image credit: Rock Paper Shotgun<\/cite><\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Honestly, I think it\u2019s a bit of both. Keeping in mind that cheaper graphics cards tend to naturally find their way into otherwise ageing desktops, it\u2019s definitely not ideal for the Arc B580\u2019s best capabilities to be so closely linked the upgrade of another, relatively expensive component. At the same time, it\u2019s not like there\u2019s a stone-carved requirement for the newest Core i9. My previous CPU testing suggests that the i9-13900K isn\u2019t actually that much faster than the mid-range Core i5-13600K, which is itself only marginally faster than the Core i5-12600K, which is three generations old at this point. In other words, the Arc B580 could lose out in an older PC setup, but anyone who\u2019s updated in the last few years will probably be fine.<\/p>\n

It’s not just ray tracing where Intel is catching up, either. It\u2019s currently only released and functional in F1 24, but XeSS 2 \u2013 the latest version of their DLSS-like upscaling tech \u2013 provides another tool for the Arc B580 to crank up its framerates. So far, XeSS 2 looks like a match for DLSS on general visual quality \u2013 quite the achievement, considering AMD FSR has been trying and failing for years \u2013 and its new frame generation component also does an impressive job of replicating DLSS 3<\/a>\u2019s AI-generated smoothness boost. Beating it, even. That 45fps at 1440p became 80fps with XeSS 2 on, while at 1080p it lept from 56fps to 102fps, in both cases rising above the respective 57fps and 77fps that the RTX 4060 produced with DLSS 3.<\/p>\n

Again, AMD have attempted something very similar with FSR 3<\/a>, but XeSS 2 seems to produce better-looking results without adding as much input lag. I\u2019d be keen to try out XeSS 2 in something twitchier than a gamepad-controlled racer, but what F1 24 shows so far is encouraging.<\/p>\n

\n
\n\"A <\/a>
Image credit: Rock Paper Shotgun<\/cite><\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The catch, mind, is that DLSS 3 has had a huge head start on game support, currently being available in over 100 games and with dozens more on the way. It\u2019s hard to see XeSS 2 catching up, ever, which means that DLSS 3 remains a more valuable feature \u2013 and that value is transferred to the GPUs that support it, including the RTX 4060.<\/p>\n

As such, the Arc B580 doesn\u2019t quite make the RTX 4060 obsolete. Nvidia will likely keep first dibs on doing that themselves, with the inevitable RTX 5060. The GeForce is also a safer bet for 1080p rigs that are still using the CPUs of yesteryear, as the fact that it doesn\u2019t benefit as much from newer chips tells us that it also won\u2019t lose out as much with older chips.<\/p>\n

Conversely, for all-new builds (or PCs that have been freshened up outside the GPU), the Arc B580 is a legit alternative. Arguably the better one, in fact, if you can live without a more widely available flavour of frame gen. Besides fixing Alchemist\u2019s ray tracing weakness and generally stabilising everything \u2013 I\u2019ve experienced none of the crashing that I did with the Arc A750 \u2013 the Battlemage architecture has produced a pleasantly peppy, affordable GPU that\u2019s more than enough for slick 1080p. And it doesn\u2019t even need twenty driver updates to get there.<\/p>\n

\n

<\/p>\n

This review is based on a retail unit provided by the manufacturer.<\/p>\n

<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

James Archer
Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

It\u2019s CPU-reliant and launches deep into a GPU generation, but this can still outpace the RTX 4060 Image credit: Rock Paper Shotgun It\u2019s not being spelt out overtly, but there is a whiff of Intel\u2019s new Battlemage GPUs being pitched as what the Alchemist generation should have been. Those eventually grew into their PCIe shoes<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":821364,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2965,661],"tags":[5776,5992],"class_list":{"0":"post-821363","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-intel","8":"category-review","9":"tag-intel","10":"tag-review"},"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/821363","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=821363"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/821363\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/821364"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=821363"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=821363"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=821363"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}