{"id":640949,"date":"2023-04-24T10:05:46","date_gmt":"2023-04-24T15:05:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/news.sellorbuyhomefast.com\/index.php\/2023\/04\/24\/xiaomi-redmi-note-12-pro-5g-review-slim-5g-smartphone-with-ois-at-flagship-level-reviews\/"},"modified":"2023-04-24T10:05:46","modified_gmt":"2023-04-24T15:05:46","slug":"xiaomi-redmi-note-12-pro-5g-review-slim-5g-smartphone-with-ois-at-flagship-level-reviews","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/2023\/04\/24\/xiaomi-redmi-note-12-pro-5g-review-slim-5g-smartphone-with-ois-at-flagship-level-reviews\/","title":{"rendered":"Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G review – Slim 5G smartphone with OIS at flagship level? Reviews"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

In one point not up to date anymore.<\/b> The Redmi Note 12 Pro aims to set new standards in the midrange with a new camera sensor and optical image stabilization. In addition to the “flagship camera,” the new MediaTek Dimensity 1080 processor is also used. Find out here whether an upgrade from the Redmi 11 Pro is worthwhile. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\"Xiaomi<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
\n

After the\u00a0Redmi Note 10 Pro<\/a>\u00a0at the latest, the Note Pro series from Xiaomi stands for a powerful camera in combination with a very good display in the midrange. Thus it is not surprising that the Chinese manufacturer also targets these qualities with the Note 12 Pro.<\/p>\n

The successor of the\u00a0Note 11 Pro<\/a>\u00a0again offers a large and fast 6.67-inch 120-Hz 1,080p+ AMOLED display, but now you can also adjust the refresh rate to the contents. With Dolby Vision, HDR10+, and stereo speakers, media consumption is now also the focus of the Xiaomi smartphone. While the Note 10 Pro and Note 11 Pro used a 108-MP sensor from Samsung (ISOCELL HM2), Xiaomi now uses the\u00a0Sony IMX766 with a resolution of 50 MP including OIS that we already know from the Xiaomi 12<\/a>.<\/p>\n

In Germany, the Redmi Note 12 Pro is available with 128 GB UFS 2.2 storage and optionally 6 (MSRP: 399 Euros, ~$439) or 8 GB LPDDR4X RAM (MSRP: 429 Euros, ~$472), but already a short time after the official sale’s start, prices start moving more toward the 300-Euro mark (~$330). At the time of this test, the 256-GB version of the\u00a0MediaTek Dimensity 1080 smartphone<\/a> is already available for about 350 Euros (~$385).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Display<\/p>\n

6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, OLED, glossy:\u00a0yes, HDR, 120\u00a0Hz<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Storage<\/p>\n

\n

128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128\u00a0GB\u00a0 <\/p>\n

, 108\u00a0GB free<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Connections<\/p>\n

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, OTG, IR blaster, Miracast<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Networking<\/p>\n

802.11 a\/b\/g\/n\/ac\/ax (a\/b\/g\/n = Wi-Fi\u00a04\/ac = Wi-Fi\u00a05\/ax = Wi-Fi\u00a06\/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G: 850 900 1,800 1,900 MHz; 3G: 1\/2\/4\/5\/6\/8\/19; 4G: 1\/2\/3\/4\/5\/7\/8\/12\/13\/17\/18\/19\/20\/26\/28\/32\/66\/38\/40\/41; 5G: n1\/3\/5\/7\/8\/20\/28\/38\/40\/41\/66\/77\/78, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Size<\/p>\n

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 162.9 x 76 ( = 0.31 x 6.41 x 2.99 in)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Battery<\/p>\n

5000\u00a0mAh Lithium-Polymer<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Charging<\/p>\n

fast charging \/ Quickcharge<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Operating System<\/p>\n

Android 12<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Camera<\/p>\n

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f\/1.9, 1\/1.56″, 1.0\u00b5m) + 8 MP (f\/2.2, 1\/4″, 1.12\u00b5m) + 2 MP (f\/2.4, macro)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f\/2.5, 1\/3.06″, 1.0\u00b5m)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Additional features<\/p>\n

Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: onscreen, case, charger, USB cable, info material, MIUI 14, 12 Months Warranty, widevine L1, SAR value: 0.376W\/\u200bkg Head, 0.798W\/\u200bkg Body, fanless<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Weight<\/p>\n

187\u00a0g ( =\u00a06.6\u00a0oz \/ 0.41\u00a0pounds), Power Supply: 131\u00a0g ( =\u00a04.62\u00a0oz \/ 0.29\u00a0pounds)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The Redmi Note 12 Pro is available in the colors Midnight Black, Sky Blue, and Polar White. Regardless of whether you get the white or black version, the high-gloss surface turns fingerprints into a noticeable problem. We would therefore recommend getting the blue color version of the Redmi Note 12 Pro, which has a matte glass back.\u00a0However, the case of our black test unit also offers a high-quality feel in our hands with good workmanship. Despite its high battery capacity of 5,000 mAh, the Xiaomi smartphone is slim at only 7.9 millimeters (~0.31 in) and also fairly light at 187 grams (~6.6 oz). The fact that the frame is made from plastic also contributes to the low weight.<\/p>\n

Thanks to the new flexible Flow AMOLED material, the bezel below the OLED panel turns out noticeably smaller than that of its predecessor, so that 87% of the front consist of the display, while it was still 86% in the Note 11 Pro<\/a>. The display is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 5. Protection against dust and water is also specified, at least against splash water according to the IP53 standard. In this regard, Samsung is still ahead with its Galaxy A series<\/a>\u00a0that offers an IP-67 certification. \u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

{element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_329948’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_331611’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_331611’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_335034’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_335034’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_329248’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_329248’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_331890’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_331890’).checked = false;return false;” title=”hide all”>\u274c<\/a><\/p>\n

164.19 mm \/ 6.46 inch<\/text>\n76.1 mm \/ 3 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n8.12 mm \/ 0.3197 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n\n\n202 g<\/text>0.4453 lbs<\/text><\/g><\/g>163.2 mm \/ 6.43 inch<\/text>\n75.95 mm \/ 2.99 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n7.7 mm \/ 0.3031 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n\n\n195 g<\/text>0.4299 lbs<\/text><\/g><\/g>162.9 mm \/ 6.41 inch<\/text>\n76 mm \/ 2.99 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n7.9 mm \/ 0.311 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n\n\n187 g<\/text>0.4123 lbs<\/text><\/g><\/g>159.6 mm \/ 6.28 inch<\/text>\n74.8 mm \/ 2.94 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n8.1 mm \/ 0.3189 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n\n\n189 g<\/text>0.4167 lbs<\/text><\/g><\/g>152.9 mm \/ 6.02 inch<\/text>\n71.2 mm \/ 2.8 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n7.75 mm \/ 0.3051 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n\n\n155 g<\/text>0.3417 lbs<\/text><\/g><\/g>148 mm \/ 5.83 inch<\/text>\n105 mm \/ 4.13 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n1 mm \/ 0.03937 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n\n\n1.5 g<\/text>0.00331 lbs<\/text><\/g><\/g><\/svg><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

In its equipment, the newest Redmi generation is again able to show its strengths, and buyers of the midrange smartphone don’t have to go without a 3.5-mm audio port, Widevine DRM L1, an IR blaster, Bluetooth 5.2, or an NFC chip for contactless payment.<\/p>\n

Like in the high-end segment,<\/a> Xiaomi also uses USB 2.0 in its midrange smartphone, which supports USB OTG but not wired image output. The connection doesn’t allow for fast data transfer rates, and the Note 12 Pro only reaches a transfer rate of 44 MB\/s in our copy test.<\/p>\n

In the state of delivery, around 106 GB of storage are still available for the user in our test unit.\u00a0Those who need more than that have to pick the 256-GB version, since the internal storage cannot be expanded via microSD card\u00a0anymore.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Unfortunately, the Chinese manufacturer isn’t as generous in terms of software updates as Samsung, for example, which offers four large updates and five years of software support as well as the current Android 13 with its Galaxy A34<\/a>. Even though the Redmi Note 12 Pro already uses the new MIUI 14 version, that is still based only on Android 12. On the other hand, the Xiaomi smartphone already uses fairly current security patches from February 2023 at the time of this test.<\/p>\n

According to Xiaomi Germany’s response to our question, the Note 12 Pro will only receive two large Android updates. You should also note that you will already use up one of the major OS upgrades to get to the current Android 13, which means that the next Android generation (Android 14) will probably be the end of the line for the Xiaomi smartphone. There are still supposed to be security updates for the Note 12 Pro until 2027, which is four years after its introduction. \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The midrange smartphone uses all the current mobile communication standards including 5G (Sub6) for mobile Internet access. With 20 LTE bands, the frequency support is extensive for the price class of the Note 12 Pro, and German users are well supported in this regard.\u00a0 <\/p>\n

In the WLAN at home, the Redmi Note 12 Pro uses fast Wi-Fi 6, but the 6-Gigahertz frequency band cannot be used for WLAN communication. In combination with our Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 reference router, we measure peak values of almost 1,000 Mbit\/s, but when receiving, we “only” reach 825 Mbit\/s on average. Its competitors with Wi-Fi 5 only reach significantly lower speeds than the Redmi Phone, and the speed is very good for a midrange smartphone that is available for less than 400 Euros (~$440). In the network at home, the Xiaomi Phone is also able to score with transfer rates that remain constant most of the time.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Networking<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
iperf3 receive AXE11000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G<\/a>
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>825<\/span> (790min<\/sup> – 837max<\/sup>)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Xiaomi Poco F4<\/a>
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>677<\/span> (331min<\/sup> – 713max<\/sup>)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c82%<\/span><\/span> -18%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Smartphone<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (34.8 – 1787, n=149, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>628<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c76%<\/span><\/span> -24%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G<\/a>
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>346<\/span> (334min<\/sup> – 353max<\/sup>)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c42%<\/span><\/span> -58%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Samsung Galaxy A53<\/a>
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>345<\/span> (328min<\/sup> – 351max<\/sup>)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c42%<\/span><\/span> -58%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Motorola Edge 30 Neo<\/a>
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>343<\/span> (323min<\/sup> – 353max<\/sup>)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c42%<\/span><\/span> -58%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

iperf3 transmit AXE11000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G<\/a>
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>977<\/span> (487min<\/sup> – 997max<\/sup>)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Xiaomi Poco F4<\/a>
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>960<\/span> (480min<\/sup> – 997max<\/sup>)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c98%<\/span><\/span> -2%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Smartphone<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (11.6 – 1810, n=150, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>667<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c68%<\/span><\/span> -32%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Motorola Edge 30 Neo<\/a>
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>358<\/span> (346min<\/sup> – 370max<\/sup>)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c37%<\/span><\/span> -63%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G<\/a>
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>354<\/span> (180min<\/sup> – 373max<\/sup>)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c36%<\/span><\/span> -64%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Samsung Galaxy A53<\/a>
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>269<\/span> (255min<\/sup> – 281max<\/sup>)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c28%<\/span><\/span> -72%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

\n0<\/text>50<\/text>100<\/text>150<\/text>200<\/text>250<\/text>300<\/text>350<\/text>400<\/text>450<\/text>500<\/text>550<\/text>600<\/text>650<\/text>700<\/text>750<\/text>800<\/text>850<\/text>900<\/text>950<\/text><\/g>Tooltip<\/text><\/svg><\/div>\n
\n

In order to evaluate the locating capabilities of the Note 12 Pro in practice, we record our route in parallel with a Garmin Venu 2 for comparison. Even though, the GPS recording doesn’t always correspond to our actual route on our short bike tour, the deviations turn out moderate.\u00a0Despite some smaller weaknesses in the locating accuracy, the Note 12 Pro is very well suited for everyday navigation tasks.<\/p>\n

Unfortunately, the midrange smartphone only determines its location using single-band GNSS \u2013 during our test, we are able to create a connection via GPS (L1), GLONASS (L1), BeiDou (B1), and Galileo (E1) as well as SBAS. Outdoors, the connection is quickly established with an accuracy of about one meter, and the Redmi smartphone is also able to locate its position quickly even indoors.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The Redmi Note 12 Pro offers a decent voice quality, making it very well suited for phone calls or video conferences. Important standards such as VoLTE and WLAN calling are supported. At 0.376 W\/kg (head) and 0.798 W\/kg (body), the radiation values fortunately are also fairly low.\u00a0The card slot of the Xiaomi smartphone is able to house two Nano-SIM cards. A dual-SIM function is also supported when using 5G.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

In contrast to its predecessors, the Redmi Note 12 Pro doesn’t use a 108-MP camera but the Sony IMX766, which is also included in the Xiaomi 12<\/a>. The main camera accompanies the 50-MP sensor with optical image stabilization and combines the four neighboring pixels into a super pixel in the standard setting. The fauxpas of the\u00a0Note 11 Pro<\/a>\u00a0with its Full-HD limitation of video recordings isn’t repeated by this successor anymore. The Note 12 Pro is able to record videos in UHD quality at 30 fps or alternatively in 1080p resolution at up to 120 fps.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

In daylight conditions, the Sony IMX766 succeeds in taking beautiful pictures with a high degree of detail and good sharpness. Even if we aren’t always impressed by the white balance, we like the main camera for a midrange smartphone. Even in lowlight conditions, the image quality is significantly better than that of the Note 11 Pro<\/a>, and our comparison pictures taken with the Google Pixel 6a<\/a>\u00a0also confirm a large jump in the camera performance of the Redmi Note 12 Pro, even if the number of sensor pixels has been significantly reduced. <\/p>\n

Unfortunately, we cannot say the same about the low-resolution ultrawide angle camera, which continues to distort significantly at the edges, shows many image artifacts, and offers a low-level of sharpness.\u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Image Comparison<\/b><\/p>\n

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.<\/p>\n

Weitwinkel<\/a>Weitwinkel<\/a>Low Light<\/a>Ultraweitwinkel<\/a>Zoom 5x<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

<\/p>\n

click to load images<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Under controlled light conditions, we take another detailed look at the image quality of the 1\/1.56-inch\u00a0sensor from Sony. The measured deviations from the reference colors remain within satisfactory limits and have significantly improved compared to the predecessor. Although the colors are reproduced less glaring, the Redmi Note 12 Pro shows some weaknesses in the white reproduction.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\"ColorChecker<\/picture>\n
\n

6.6 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

8.7 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

3.7 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

11.1 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

3.9 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

4.2 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

9.7 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

4.5 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

10 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

3.9 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

6.1 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

6.5 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

3 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

6.6 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

8.9 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

10.7 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

7.1 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

1.1 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

12.5 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

10.6 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

5.6 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

4.4 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

2.4 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

5.7 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>

ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G<\/a>: 6.57\u00a0\u2206E min: 1.14 – max: 12.47\u00a0\u2206E<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\n
\"ColorChecker<\/picture>\n
\n

26 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

41.5 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

34.3 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

34.1 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

37 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

50.8 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

38.8 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

26.4 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

26.1 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

25.6 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

52.7 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

54.6 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

23.6 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

40.6 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

19.6 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

57.2 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

31.9 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

38.1 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

46.7 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

49.1 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

45.2 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

35.3 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

23.5 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

13.5 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>

ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G<\/a>: 36.35\u00a0\u2206E min: 13.46 – max: 57.19\u00a0\u2206E<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\"67-Watt<\/a>
67-Watt charger of the Note 12 Pro<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
\n

The box of the Note 12 Pro includes a protective cover, USB-C cable, quick-start guide, and SIM toolkit, and fortunately, a corresponding 67-Watt Turbo Charging charger is also included with the midrange smartphone.<\/p>\n

There is only a one-year limited standard warranty for the Redmi smartphone in Germany. However, the required manufacturer warranty of 24 months for new devices in Germany remains unaffected by this.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The AMOLED panel with a refresh rate of 120 Hz makes animations and scrolling websites appear very smooth. The capacitive touchscreen with a scan rate of up to 240 Hz recognizes inputs quickly and accurately. In the state of delivery, the manufacturer has installed a protective foil that is less prone to show greasy smudges. The vibration motor of the Redmi Note 12 Pro is very attractive and accurate for a midrange smartphone.\u00a0<\/p>\n

A fingerprint sensor hidden in the power button provides biometric security. The positioning in the Redmi Note 12 Pro feels very comfortable and makes it easily accessible. The active sensor responds swiftly, delivering good recognition rates. In good light conditions, the unlocking process works even faster using face recognition via the front camera. However, the 2D process that is used here is less secure.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n