{"id":625082,"date":"2023-04-03T09:49:10","date_gmt":"2023-04-03T14:49:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/news.sellorbuyhomefast.com\/index.php\/2023\/04\/03\/apple-wins-appeal-over-uk-mobile-market-competition-probe\/"},"modified":"2023-04-03T09:49:10","modified_gmt":"2023-04-03T14:49:10","slug":"apple-wins-appeal-over-uk-mobile-market-competition-probe","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/2023\/04\/03\/apple-wins-appeal-over-uk-mobile-market-competition-probe\/","title":{"rendered":"Apple wins appeal over UK mobile market competition probe"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Good news for Apple in the UK where a competition appeals court on Friday quashed a decision by the antitrust regulator to open an investigation of the iPhone makers\u2019 mobile browser and cloud gaming service.<\/p>\n

The Competition Appeals Tribunal (CAT) ruled<\/a> the regulator failed to stick to established statutory timeframes for such investigations \u2014 basically, it was too late in deciding to open the probe \u2014 with Apple\u2019s appeal succeeding on this point of law.<\/p>\n

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) announced a formal investigation \u2014 aka a Market Investigation Reference (MIR) \u2014 last fall<\/a>, which was focused on both Apple\u2019s iOS and Google\u2019s Android mobile platform.<\/p>\n

The MIR decision followed a market study of the mobile duopoly \u2014 which the CMA kicked off in June 2021<\/a> \u2014 and resulted in a preliminary finding of competition concerns, back in December 2021<\/a>. However, at that time, the regulator decided against taking any action \u2014 apparently anticipating new powers to tackle Big Tech as a result of a \u201cpro-competition\u201d reboot the government had suggested it would implement, back in fall 2020<\/a>, following a 2019 competition policy review.<\/p>\n

The problem for the CMA is the UK government failed to stick to this plan. And, in May 2022<\/a>, under then prime minister Boris Johnson, it kicked the competition reboot into the long grass \u2014 leaving the CMA\u2019s Digital Markets Unit dangling without the expected new powers. Which also of course left its earlier decision to hang fire on taking action over mobile market concerns in anticipation of bespoke competition powers high and dry.<\/p>\n

In June 2022<\/a>, the CMA pressed on to publish a final report of what was then a year-long mobile ecosystem study cementing its view that there are substantial concerns about the market power of Apple and Google which require regulatory intervention. And in November<\/a> it announced an in-depth investigation of elements of particular concern \u2014 including Apple\u2019s mobile browser and cloud gaming \u2014 apparently seeking to make the best of a bad situation.<\/p>\n

However, by then it was too late \u2014 and, per the Tribunal, the CMA likely erred in law by attempting to re-visit an earlier decision not to make a reference.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe CMA did not have the option to decide not to make a reference at all with a reservation entitling it to re-visit that decision at its discretion at a later date,\u201d the Tribunal writes in a 42-page judgement <\/a>on where it saw the regulator\u2019s decision-making go wrong. \u201cThe choice made by the CMA \u2014 to make a final decision not to refer \u2014 is, as we have said, questionable on public law grounds.\u201d<\/p>\n

Commenting in a statement<\/a>, a CMA spokesperson suggested it may seek to appeal \u2014 writing:<\/p>\n

\n

We are disappointed with today\u2019s judgment. We made this market investigation reference to make sure that UK consumers get a better choice of mobile internet services and that UK developers can invest in innovative new apps. Our concerns, and the reasons why we launched our market investigation, were not challenged by Apple.<\/u><\/u><\/p>\n

Today\u2019s judgment has found there are material constraints on the CMA\u2019s general ability to refer markets for in-depth investigations. This risks substantially undermining the CMA\u2019s ability to efficiently and effectively investigate and intervene in markets where competition is not working well.<\/u><\/u><\/p>\n

Given the importance of today\u2019s judgment, we will be considering our options including seeking permission to appeal.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Update:<\/strong> An Apple spokesperson said:<\/p>\n

\n
\n

Apple believes in vibrant and competitive markets where innovation can flourish. Through the Apple ecosystem we have created a safe and trusted experience users love and a great business opportunity for developers. In the UK alone, the iOS app economy supports hundreds of thousands of jobs and makes it possible for developers big and small to reach customers around the world. We are pleased with the Competition Appeal Tribunal\u2019s decision and will continue working to deliver support for developers and a safe and secure experience for users.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n

The saga underlines how political chaos in the UK has not only undermined new policymaking in the digital arena but continues to have knock-on implications for the enforcement of existing laws that might otherwise have been applied, years earlier, to curb the market power of tech giants \u2014 if regulators had had clear guidance and commitment from lawmakers to take action. Instead critical oversight bodies like the CMA have been left flapping in the wind atop a political quagmire and it\u2019s tech giants who\u2019ve enjoyed much steadier sailing.<\/p>\n

\n
\n

Seems a direct result of this government\u2019s choice to delay the Digital Market Unit legislation, as CMA only delayed investigation in expectation of new powers. Regulators\u2019 paralysis, of the sort this gov pushes, means even the decisions they want to make are procedurally fragile. https:\/\/t.co\/1MhDDiiW5b<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 Michael Veale @mi****<\/span>@***********<\/span>es.computer<\/span> (@mikarv) April 3, 2023<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

Read More<\/a>
\n Natasha Lomas<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Good news for Apple in the UK where a competition appeals court on Friday quashed a decision by the antitrust regulator to open an investigation of the iPhone makers\u2019 mobile browser and cloud gaming service. The Competition Appeals Tribunal (CAT) ruled the regulator failed to stick to established statutory timeframes for such investigations \u2014 basically<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":625083,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26136,376,46],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-625082","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-appeal","8":"category-apple","9":"category-technology"},"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/625082","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=625082"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/625082\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/625083"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=625082"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=625082"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=625082"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}