This week\u2019s Media Briefing previews the upcoming Digiday Publishing Summit (DPS), which kicks off on March 27 and will feature speakers from media companies including BuzzFeed, Dotdash Meredith, Forbes and The Daily Beast.\u00a0<\/p>\n
The crystal ball that publishers used to predict just how awful the start of 2023 would be seems to have been pretty accurate, if only for the fact that visibility for this quarter has been cloudier than normal.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Publishing execs kicked off the first quarter with advertising revenues pacing anywhere from flat year over year to 25% behind forecasts<\/a>, putting sales teams in a position where they\u2019ve had to chase harder after in-quarter advertising deals<\/a>. Meanwhile, subscription businesses are still growing but at a slower pace, returning to normal<\/a> after the pandemic subscription boom. Commerce businesses and what publishers classify as \u201cother\u201d revenue streams are seemingly staying the course<\/a>, all things considered.\u00a0<\/p>\n Given just how uncertain 2023 has been for most publishers so far, it seems like a good time for\u00a0 publishing executives to come together once again in Vail, Colo., for the next iteration of the Digiday Publishing Summit, taking place March 27-29. The three-day-long conference will feature on-stage conversations between leaders from top publishing companies and Digiday\u2019s media team, covering everything from the role of first-party data across media organizations\u2019 businesses to incorporating artificial intelligence into their editorial strategies. And in between those sessions, closed-door conversations will take place for attendees to compare notes on advertising pains and revenue diversification efforts.<\/p>\n Stay tuned for our coverage next week, which will share some of what was said on stage each day, as well as some of what was said behind those closed doors in the Media Briefing. For now, here are a few key topics of discussion that we expect will be the talk of this spring\u2019s DPS.\u00a0<\/p>\n Cross-team collaboration\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n While the separation of church and state between editorial and revenue teams is still a priority within media companies, the walls between sales, subscriptions, commerce and marketing divisions have been rapidly shrinking. Expedited most recently by the increased focus on building and acquiring first-party data, publishers are realizing that this data has more applications than being solely focused on selling ads in a post-third-party cookie world.\u00a0<\/p>\n What\u2019s more, commerce teams are being increasingly restructured to work with sales<\/a> instead of against them. This means rather than selling branded commerce content or programmatic advertising on shopping pages on their own, commerce sales teams are working with advertising sales teams to incorporate ad spots into larger campaigns \u2014 hopefully in order to avoid undercutting<\/a> how much a brand is willing to pay to be featured on a publisher\u2019s site.\u00a0<\/p>\n During the on-stage sessions with Nina Gould, Forbes\u2019 chief product officer, and Katie Pillich, The Daily Beast\u2019s svp of revenue operations, attendees will get first-hand accounts from these execs about how they\u2019ve restructured their teams over the past couple of years to improve collaboration in the larger mission to increase long-term revenue. While the teams that Gould oversees champion lifetime value (LTV) as the ultimate metric, Pillich\u2019s team measures all success through average revenue per user (ARPU). And both companies report positive revenue growth as a result of these changes.\u00a0<\/p>\n Navigating the advertising landscape\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n Since last summer, advertising budgets have become trickier for marketers and agencies to nail down. And, as a result, they\u2019ve become less reliable for publishers to plan around. Because of this, sales cycles have been shrinking and sales teams are forcing themselves to bend over backward in the name of flexibility and maintaining relationships with those advertisers who aren\u2019t able or don\u2019t want to spend as much on campaigns this quarter.\u00a0<\/p>\n In a live recording of the Digiday Podcast, BuzzFeed\u2019s svp of programmatic, Michele DeVine, will discuss the company\u2019s Programmatic Unlocked structure, which it launched a few years ago. The structure encourages advertisers to purchase programmatic ads directly through BuzzFeed\u2019s sales team by incentivizing them with added value in the form of custom content.\u00a0<\/p>\n Later on in the summit, Jessica Kadden, Penske Media\u2019s svp of programmatic sales, will share her thoughts about the future of programmatic advertising for publishers. This revenue stream has faced its fair share of troubles over the past few months, between CPMs hitting an all-time low<\/a> since the early months of the pandemic and third-party brand safety ratings causing large swaths of publishers\u2019 content to be under monetized or demonetized entirely.\u00a0<\/p>\n The privacy police are cracking down<\/strong><\/p>\n Over in the newsletter landscape, TheSkimm\u2019s CRO Mary Murcko is set to discuss the role of first-party data and data privacy compliance within her company, given the fact that privacy has become a major focus for publishers this year after five new privacy laws went into effect in the United States at the start of 2023.\u00a0<\/p>\n It seems that, in order to be compliant with recent privacy regulations as well as continue to make money, first-party data will be key. Those unique publisher-honed insights into the audience not only help to identify reader interests and backgrounds, but do so in a way that readers understand and trust, which can ultimately lead to improved engagement.<\/p>\n AI: A content production engine?<\/strong><\/p>\n Generative AI has become the latest buzzword among media executives<\/a> as they reckon with the opportunities \u2014 and threats<\/a> \u2014 that this technology presents to their businesses, especially since the launch of OpenAI\u2019s chatbot ChatGPT last November. While a number of editorial teams are experimenting with generative AI<\/a> for research, data analysis and story ideation, others are already integrating the technology into their content creation processes.\u00a0<\/p>\n Enter Ingenio, which owns sites like Horoscope.com and Astrology.com. At DPS, president of media Josh Jaffe will outline how the company is using AI-powered large language models like GPT-3 to produce thousands of pieces of content (such as dream interpretations and birth charts) in an effort to expand its audience, personalize content and find new ways to engage with its readers. \u2013 Sara Guaglione<\/em><\/p>\n The podcast bubble is in a precarious position\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n The podcasting space has not been immune to the macroeconomic challenges that traditional and digital media companies are facing, and many podcast publishers are hedging their bets<\/a> when it comes to investing in growth in 2023. Listenership has plateaued<\/a>, but advertising seems to be hanging in there<\/a> for the time being, though it leaves podcast teams questioning how long that will last. At the Summit, Steve Raizes, evp of podcasting and audio at Paramount, will share how his team is thinking about growth, as well as maintaining revenue, in the current economic climate.<\/p>\n \u201cIt doesn\u2019t matter where we are in terms of planning for a program anymore \u2026 budgets are getting pulled at the last minute \u2026 so now it\u2019s very hard to forecast. We don\u2019t know what\u2019s real, because [advertisers are] shifting so frequently and they\u2019re more than willing to take those cancelation fees.\u201d<\/p>\n \u2014 A media executive<\/em><\/cite><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Bloomberg Media launched its New Voices program in 2018 with the goal of improving representation in the news. The program \u2014 which consists of an intensive, four-hour media training program and an internal database of diverse and female executives \u2014 added over 8,400 female experts in business and finance to its database, up from 500 in 2018. The share of external guests who identify as women on Bloomberg TV also increased from 10% to 34% in the five-year span since the program began, according to the company.\u00a0<\/p>\n This year, the program \u2014 which takes place in 13 cities around the world \u2014 will expand to Paris and Frankfurt. Laura Zelenko, the head of Bloomberg\u2019s New Voices program and senior executive editor for talent, diversity, training and standards, spoke with Digiday about what this growth means for the continued improvement of the representation of women on TV and within Bloomberg\u2019s newsroom, of which 46% of its current employees are female. \u2013 Sara Guaglione<\/em><\/p>\n This conversation has been edited and condensed.<\/em><\/p>\n Why did you think it was important to create a program to get more female sources on TV?<\/strong><\/p>\n I was very interested in looking at our representation at every level of the newsroom, but also in our sourcing\u2026 The [10%] figure was much lower than we thought. One of the reasons you\u2019ll hear from many newsrooms is that we\u2019re busy, and we go to the [sources] <\/strong>that we\u2019re accustomed to. A lot of the bookers were saying it was hard to find other voices. But we also realized that there was a real issue coming from the firms that are the sources of our main guests on Bloomberg TV. We cover financial services largely and so we\u2019re going to the banks mostly, and the banks were generally pushing to us the same people. And when we did identify women that we wanted to talk to, often they would say that they didn\u2019t feel comfortable coming on or they didn\u2019t have the training or they didn\u2019t feel supported. So we were thinking about what we could do to disrupt that system and be more proactive \u2026 to change that pipeline.<\/p>\n How do you track Bloomberg\u2019s sourcing of female executives?<\/strong><\/p>\n In order to hold ourselves accountable to make real change, we wanted to set up a [global] data tracking system. We collect the data every week. We also built a database of female experts around the world\u2026 If you\u2019re looking for a female portfolio manager in London who can talk about the automotive sector, it could get that specific.<\/p>\n We\u2019re [recording] how often we\u2019re bringing in female external guests onto our TV programming. We also track how often a female expert source is quoted in stories [with] a publishing tool \u2026 and we [track female representation] on other platforms [like] our magazines and photography. We also have a [self-identification] form where we can start looking at other metrics of diversity as well, if the people self-ID in the United States. In 2020, in addition to all the cohorts that we\u2019re doing for female experts through the New Voices program, we launched [a database] of Black [and LatinX] executives of all gender identities in the United States.<\/p>\n What about the representation within Bloomberg\u2019s own newsroom \u2014 has it improved?<\/strong><\/p>\n We do track that data as well and set goals and hold managers accountable for change. We do track our bylines in [the Businessweek magazine] \u2014 who\u2019s doing the covers, for instance. There\u2019s definitely [been] improvements.\u00a0<\/p>\n One of the challenges that I think a lot of newsrooms have is at the editing level so we [started] a senior editor workshop for women [who] want to get to the next level to do some more high impact, enterprise investigative coverage. We do a three day workshop \u2026 to address that problem. It\u2019s definitely helped [get more women into senior editing positions]. But there\u2019s more work to do.\u00a0<\/p>\n 10%:<\/strong><\/a> <\/strong>The amount spent so far from Spotify\u2019s $100 Million Diversity Fund, which the platform said that, as of January, it was still determining which projects it would be prioritizing.\u00a0<\/p>\n $100 million:<\/strong><\/a> The amount of money that Vice Media\u2019s co-founder and CEO Shane Smith is said to have made from the media company, about a quarter of Vice\u2019s current value.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n 4 years:<\/strong><\/a> The length of Joy Robins\u2019 tenure as the CRO of the Washington Post before announcing she was leaving to join The New York Times to become its global chief advertising officer.\u00a0<\/p>\n 74%:<\/strong><\/a> The percentage of 112 publisher pros who say their companies make money from video advertising, with 33% currently getting a small or very small portion of their revenue from video ads, according to Digiday+ Research.<\/p>\n \u2018The next level for us\u2019: The New York Times eyes longer play sessions for games in subscription drive:\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n Read more about the role of gaming in the Times\u2019 subscription strategy <\/em>here<\/em><\/a>.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n Publishers tout generative AI opportunities to save and make money amid rough media market:<\/strong><\/p>\n Read more about publishers\u2019 AI ambitions <\/em>here<\/em><\/a>.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n In graphic detail \u2014 Publishers\u2019 full year 2022 earnings:\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n Learn more about how publishers\u2019 businesses fared in 2022 <\/em>here<\/em><\/a>.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n How The Guardian\u2019s Luis Romero is selling the legacy U.K. publication in the U.S.:<\/strong><\/p>\n Hear from Romero about how he\u2019s steering The Guardian U.S.\u2019s advertising business <\/em>here<\/em><\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n Meta ditches the metaverse:<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n Less than two years after renaming itself Meta \u2014 inspired by CEO Mark Zuckerberg\u2019s metaverse ambitions \u2014 the company is notably de-emphasizing its metaverse ambitions, according to Axios. Last week, the company announced it will be having another round of layoffs, which will impact about 10,000 people and 5,000 open roles, and while this will not entirely reduce the company\u2019s metaverse initiatives, the priority seems to be shifting to AI technology.\u00a0<\/p>\n The New York Times staff is voicing anger on Slack amid labor strife:<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n After two years and more than 50 bargaining sessions, The New York Times union and the company\u2019s management haven\u2019t been able to find an agreed upon middle ground when it comes to wages, healthcare benefits and other issues, reported The Wall Street Journal. But staffers have started using Slack to air their frustrations in recent days.\u00a0<\/p>\n BuzzFeed\u2019s Tasty brand leans into TikTok casual:<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n Food vertical Tasty is changing its look to more closely resemble the casual, low production-quality look of TikTok in an effort to appear more authentic to viewers, reported The Drum. Backdrops and test kitchens are too professional for the platforms that are favoring short-form vertical video.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n Vice Media\u2019s downfall began with Disney:<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n In 2016, talks occurred between Disney and Vice Media about a possible acquisition when Vice was valued at a healthy $3.5 billion, reported Insider. But those talks dried up, and CEO Shane Smith at the time turned his sights toward California for other potential buyers there.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\nWhat we\u2019ve heard<\/h2>\n
\n
Bloomberg\u2019s push for more female voices<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Numbers to know<\/h2>\n
What we\u2019ve covered<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
What we\u2019re reading<\/h2>\n