{"id":618555,"date":"2023-03-16T09:48:44","date_gmt":"2023-03-16T14:48:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/news.sellorbuyhomefast.com\/index.php\/2023\/03\/16\/asus-rog-zephyrus-duo-16-notebook-review-multitasking-monster-with-amd-zen4-rtx-4090-mini-led-notebookcheck-net-reviews\/"},"modified":"2023-03-16T09:48:44","modified_gmt":"2023-03-16T14:48:44","slug":"asus-rog-zephyrus-duo-16-notebook-review-multitasking-monster-with-amd-zen4-rtx-4090-mini-led-notebookcheck-net-reviews","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/2023\/03\/16\/asus-rog-zephyrus-duo-16-notebook-review-multitasking-monster-with-amd-zen4-rtx-4090-mini-led-notebookcheck-net-reviews\/","title":{"rendered":"Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 Notebook Review: Multitasking monster with AMD Zen4, RTX 4090 & Mini-LED – NotebookCheck.net Reviews"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Debut for the AMD Zen4 Ryzen 9 7945HX.<\/b> Asus refreshes its ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 and uses the best components you can currently get. The new GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop is supported by AMD\u2019s Ryzen 9 7945HX, the fastest mobile CPU right now. The manufacturer also replaces the 4K screen with a new WQHD Mini-LED panel with 240 Hz, which is supported by a secondary 4K screen. Update: sRGB profile is included<\/b><\/p>\n

Andreas Osthoff ????<\/span><\/span> (translated by<\/a> Andreas Osthoff), Published ????????<\/a> ????????<\/a> <\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Asus continues the concept of the ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 with its two screens in 2023 and uses the best technologies you can currently get for laptops. In addition to the brand-new mobile graphics cards from Nvidia, the\u00a0GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop<\/a>, Asus once again uses HX processor from AMD. It is actually one of the first laptops in our editorial office with the new\u00a0AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/a>, which offers 16 Zen4 cores against Intel\u2019s Raptor Lake HX CPUs. Asus also upgraded the display: The resolution drops from 4K to WQHD, but it is a matte Mini-LED panel with a refresh rate of 240 Hz and fast response times.\n<\/p>\n

The classification of the laptop is actually not that simple, because the Zephyrus Duo could be a gaming laptop, a machine for content creator or even a mobile workstation. However, the concept with two screens is definitely not interesting for every user. There are currently four different configurations and our review unit with the RTX 4090 Laptop, 32 GB RAM and 2 TB SSD storage retails for 4999 Euros. The SKU with the smaller 1 TB SSD as well as the GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop will be available soon for 4299 Euros.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Processor<\/p>\n

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/a> 16 x 2.5 – 5.4\u00a0GHz, 130\u00a0W\u00a0PL2 \/ Short Burst, 120\u00a0W\u00a0PL1 \/ Sustained, Dragon Range (Zen4)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Memory<\/p>\n

\n

32\u00a0GB\u00a0 <\/p>\n

, DDR5-4800, Dual-Channel, max. 64 GB<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Display<\/p>\n

16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, capacitive, NE160QDM-NM4, MiniLED, glossy:\u00a0no, HDR, 240\u00a0Hz<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Mainboard<\/p>\n

AMD Promontory\/Bixby FCH<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Storage<\/p>\n

\n

SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N, 2048\u00a0GB\u00a0 <\/p>\n

, 1900\u00a0GB free<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Connections<\/p>\n

4 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: microSD<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Networking<\/p>\n

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10\/100\/1000\/2500MBit\/s), MediaTek RZ616 (a\/b\/g\/n = Wi-Fi\u00a04\/ac = Wi-Fi\u00a05\/ax = Wi-Fi\u00a06\/ Wi-Fi\u00a06E 6\u00a0GHz), Bluetooth 5.2<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Size<\/p>\n

height x width x depth (in mm): 29.7 x 355 x 266 ( = 1.17 x 13.98 x 10.47 in)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Battery<\/p>\n

90\u00a0Wh, 5675\u00a0mAh Lithium-Polymer<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Operating System<\/p>\n

Microsoft Windows 11 Home<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Camera<\/p>\n

Webcam: 1080p
Primary Camera: 2 MPix<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Additional features<\/p>\n

Speakers: 6 Speakers, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 330W PSU, ROG Backpack, rubberized palmrest, 24 Months Warranty<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Weight<\/p>\n

2.666\u00a0kg ( =\u00a094.04\u00a0oz \/ 5.88\u00a0pounds), Power Supply: 1.149\u00a0kg ( =\u00a040.53\u00a0oz \/ 2.53\u00a0pounds)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The chassis design did not change compared to the previous model<\/a>. The laptop is actually rather subtle when the lid is closed and only the ROG logo is colored compared to the otherwise matte black finish. There is no crazy chassis lighting, either. The quality of the laptop leaves a good impression, only the plastic bottom cover falls a bit short.\n<\/p>\n

Once you open the lid, however, you will immediately see that this is not a regular laptop. Depending on the opening angle of the main screen, the secondary screen is slightly raised (to ~15 degrees) and shifted towards the back, which uncovers a transparent cover above the keyboard where you can even glimpse inside the chassis at the corners. The angle of the secondary screen cannot be changed, but it works well in practice. The lifting mechanism is also very sturdy and there are no movements. The stability is very good in general, only the maximum opening angle of the lid is a bit limited at ~130 degrees.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Our size comparison shows that the 17-inch\u00a0MSI Titan GT77<\/a>\u00a0has a much bigger footprint, but it also shows that the ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 is by far the thickest device in our little comparison group. This is obviously caused by the secondary screen, which requires additional space. It is also one of the heaviest 16-inch models at almost 2.7 kg and you also have to consider the bulky 330W power supply, which tips the scale at more than 1.1 kg.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

{element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_335274’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_335619’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_335619’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_336219’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_336219’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_335277’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_335277’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_329277’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_329277’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_334928’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_334928’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_335351’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_335351’).checked = false;return false;” title=”hide all”>\u274c<\/a><\/p>\n

397 mm \/ 15.6 inch<\/text>\n330 mm \/ 13 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n23 mm \/ 0.906 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n\n\n3.5 kg<\/text>7.65 lbs<\/text><\/g><\/g>363 mm \/ 14.3 inch<\/text>\n262 mm \/ 10.3 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n26 mm \/ 1.024 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n\n\n2.7 kg<\/text>5.89 lbs<\/text><\/g><\/g>355 mm \/ 14 inch<\/text>\n266 mm \/ 10.5 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n29.7 mm \/ 1.169 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n\n\n2.7 kg<\/text>5.88 lbs<\/text><\/g><\/g>355 mm \/ 14 inch<\/text>\n244 mm \/ 9.61 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n21.99 mm \/ 0.866 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n\n\n2.4 kg<\/text>5.34 lbs<\/text><\/g><\/g>355 mm \/ 14 inch<\/text>\n266 mm \/ 10.5 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n20.5 mm \/ 0.807 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n\n\n2.6 kg<\/text>5.64 lbs<\/text><\/g><\/g>355.7 mm \/ 14 inch<\/text>\n248.1 mm \/ 9.77 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n16.8 mm \/ 0.661 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n\n\n2.2 kg<\/text>4.76 lbs<\/text><\/g><\/g>297 mm \/ 11.7 inch<\/text>\n210 mm \/ 8.27 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n1 mm \/ 0.03937 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n\n\n5.7 g<\/text>0.01257 lbs<\/text><\/g><\/g><\/svg><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The rear area of the base unit is almost completely occupied by the cooling, which is why there are only three ports (Ethernet, HDMI, USB-A) in the center of the rear. The majority of the remaining ports is located at the front of the left side, which is also the case for the angled power connector. The cable from the PSU is pretty short, so the power cable can block the USB-A port depending on the orientation. There is one more USB-C port at the left side.\n<\/p>\n

In addition to the somewhat inconvenient port layout, we are surprised that Asus did not include USB 4 support. The AMD processor supports USB 4 in general, but requires an additional USB controller, and it seems Asus did not want to spend the money.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

There is a microSD card reader at the left side and SD cards sit flush with the chassis. The transfer rates in combination with our reference card (Angelbird AV Pro V60 128 GB) are excellent and we measure up to 270 MB\/s and more than 180 MB\/s when we copy jpeg image files.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\"The<\/a>
The Wi-Fi module is located underneath the M.2-SSD.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

You get a 2.5 Gbps Ethernet jack at the rear and the Wi-Fi module (RZ616) also supports the modern Wi-Fi 6E standard for 6 GHz networks. We had no issues to use the corresponding 6 GHz Wi-Fi network with our reference router from Asus and the transfer rates were both very high and stable. Bluetooth 5.2 is supported as well.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Networking<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
MediaTek RZ616<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz<\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>1767 (min: 1634)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c100%<\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz<\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>1738 (min: 1633)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c96%<\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
iperf3 transmit AXE11000<\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n <\/span>1582 (min: 1517)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c93%<\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

iperf3 receive AXE11000<\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>1545 (min: 1508)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c91%<\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
iperf3 transmit AXE11000<\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>1579 (min: 848)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c93%<\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

iperf3 receive AXE11000<\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>1619 (min: 1537)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c96%<\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
iperf3 transmit AXE11000<\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>1155 (min: 495)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c68%<\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

iperf3 receive AXE11000<\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>1328 (min: 1093)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c78%<\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz<\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>1371 (min: 1036)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c78%<\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz<\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>1494 (min: 1283)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c83%<\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
iperf3 transmit AXE11000<\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>1695 (min: 1556)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c100%<\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

iperf3 receive AXE11000<\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>1692 (min: 1567)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c100%<\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max<\/a>
Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz<\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>1730 (min: 1700)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c98%<\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz<\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>1803 (min: 1749)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c100%<\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n
\n0<\/text>50<\/text>100<\/text>150<\/text>200<\/text>250<\/text>300<\/text>350<\/text>400<\/text>450<\/text>500<\/text>550<\/text>600<\/text>650<\/text>700<\/text>750<\/text>800<\/text>850<\/text>900<\/text>950<\/text>1000<\/text>1050<\/text>1100<\/text>1150<\/text>1200<\/text>1250<\/text>1300<\/text>1350<\/text>1400<\/text>1450<\/text>1500<\/text>1550<\/text>1600<\/text>1650<\/text>1700<\/text>1750<\/text>1800<\/text>1850<\/text><\/g>Tooltip<\/text><\/svg><\/div>\n
\n

Asus upgraded the webcam and now uses a 1080p sensor. This has a positive effect on the sharpness of images compared to the previous model, but the color accuracy is still not very good. The ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 does not offer a mechanical shutter.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\"ColorChecker<\/picture>\n
\n

19.9 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

14.8 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

21.2 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

20.9 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

18.1 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

12.6 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

13.5 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

26 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

18.4 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

18.6 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

10.4 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

9.1 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

22.3 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

16.5 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

21.6 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

6.1 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

17.5 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

19.8 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

2.3 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

8.9 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

12.5 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

15.1 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

14 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

2.1 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>

ColorChecker Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>: 15.1\u00a0\u2206E min: 2.09 – max: 26\u00a0\u2206E<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Every version of the ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 is shipped with a rubberized palm rest as well a dark ROG backpack, which leaves a pretty good quality impression. The more expensive units with Windows 11 Pro, 64 GB RAM and 2 or 4 TB SSD storage also include the ROG Fusion II 300 headset as well as the gaming mouse ROG Gladius III Mouse P514.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The bottom cover is secured by several Torx screws (TR6), but there is also an additional screw hidden in the center underneath a glued rubber pad, which makes it unnecessarily complicated to access the internals. Inside you get two SO-DIMM slots as well as two M.2-2280 slots for SSDs. It is also possible to replace the Wi-Fi module, but you will have to remove the SSD first.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The additional screen requires a shift towards the front of the base unit for the keyboard, which is obviously not ideal for the ergonomics. Asus knows this as well and ships every unit with a rubberized palm rest. It works well on your desk at home, but it is no help when you are on the road. The keyboard itself offers a comfortable typing experience with a shallow, but also quiet key travel. The keyboard is illuminated and you can use the Armoury Crate software to set the color for every key individually (if you want).\n<\/p>\n

The touchpad in portrait orientation is sitting right next to the keyboard and even standard cursor movements can be challenging and require multiple attempts due to the narrow form factor. You can also use the touchpad as a numeric keypad (activated by tap in the upper left corner), which works well.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The 16-inch Mini-LED panel is one major upgrade over the previous model. It offers the WQHD resolution (2560 x 2600 pixels, 16:10) and a refresh rate of 240 Hz. The matte panel offers an exceptional image quality with razor-sharp contents and rich colors. Asus advertises a brightness of up to 1100 nits, but you have to differentiate between SDR and HDR contents.\n<\/p>\n

The test results are very good and while the Mini-LED panel of the\u00a0MacBook Pro 16<\/a>\u00a0only reaches 500 nits for SDR contents, wen can measure up to 700 nits for the review unit. It even manages almost 1400 nits with HDR contents, and it does not matter if you only have a small area or a full picture. The HDR implementation of Windows on the other hand is still cumbersome and requires a manual settings change.\n<\/p>\n

The black value is extremely low and results in an excellent contrast ratio. Mini-LED panels also do not have any issues with clouding or backlight bleeding.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n692
cd\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n		690
cd\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n		693
cd\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n724
cd\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n		712
cd\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n		709
cd\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n701
cd\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n		710
cd\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n		693
cd\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

Distribution of brightness<\/i><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

NE160QDM-NM4<\/p>\n

X-Rite i1Pro 2<\/p>\n

Maximum: 724\u00a0cd\/m\u00b2 (Nits) Average: 702.7\u00a0cd\/m\u00b2 Minimum: 85\u00a0cd\/m\u00b2
Brightness Distribution:\u00a095 %
Center on Battery: 713\u00a0cd\/m\u00b2<\/span>
Contrast: 10171:1 (Black: 0.07\u00a0cd\/m\u00b2)
\u0394E Color 1.7 | 0.59-29.43 \u00d85.2, calibrated:\u00a01.2
\u0394E Greyscale 2.8 | 0.57-98 \u00d85.4
90.8%\u00a0AdobeRGB\u00a01998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100%\u00a0sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4%\u00a0Display\u00a0P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.21<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
<\/th>\nAsus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NE160QDM-NM4, MiniLED, 2560×1600, 16.00<\/span><\/th>\n		MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
B173ZAN06.C, Mini-LED, 3840×2160, 17.30<\/span><\/th>\n		Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
2560×1600, 16.00<\/span><\/th>\n		Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
MNG007DA2-3 (CSO1628), IPS, 2560×1600, 16.00<\/span><\/th>\n		Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
CSOT T3 MNG007DA4-1, IPS, 2560×1600, 16.00<\/span><\/th>\n		Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
BOE NE160QAM-NX1, IPS-Level, 3840×2400, 16.00<\/span><\/th>\n		Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max<\/a>
Mini-LED, 3456×2234, 16.20<\/span><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
Display<\/td>\n<\/td>\n\n

-1%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-20%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-17%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-1%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-2%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-1%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Display P3 Coverage<\/td>\n\n

99.4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

94.9 <\/p>\n

-5%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

67.44 <\/p>\n

-32%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

69.1 <\/p>\n

-30%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

98.5 <\/p>\n

-1%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

98 <\/p>\n

-1%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

99 <\/p>\n

0%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

sRGB Coverage<\/td>\n\n

100<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

99.9 <\/p>\n

0%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

96.89 <\/p>\n

-3%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

99.7 <\/p>\n

0%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

100 <\/p>\n

0%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

99.9 <\/p>\n

0%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

100 <\/p>\n

0%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage<\/td>\n\n

90.8<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

92.4 <\/p>\n

2%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

68.93 <\/p>\n

-24%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

71.2 <\/p>\n

-22%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

89.7 <\/p>\n

-1%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

86.3 <\/p>\n

-5%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

88.5 <\/p>\n

-3%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Response Times<\/td>\n<\/td>\n\n

-91%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

<\/td>\n\n

44%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

47%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

38%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-185%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Response Time Grey 50% \/ Grey 80% *<\/td>\n\n

15.2 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?<\/a>(11.2, 4)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n<\/td>\n\n\n\n\n
Response Time Black \/ White *<\/td>\n\n

19 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?<\/a>(10.6, 8.4)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n<\/td>\n\n\n\n\n
PWM Frequency<\/td>\n\n

12000 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?<\/a>(100)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n\n
Screen<\/td>\n<\/td>\n\n

6565%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-152%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-48%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-78%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-104%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

618%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Brightness middle<\/td>\n\n

712<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

606 <\/p>\n

-15%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

377.62 <\/p>\n

-47%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

511 <\/p>\n

-28%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

456.8 <\/p>\n

-36%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

459 <\/p>\n

-36%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

504 <\/p>\n

-29%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Brightness<\/td>\n\n

703<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

602 <\/p>\n

-14%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

<\/td>\n\n
\n

469 <\/p>\n

-33%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

437 <\/p>\n

-38%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

434 <\/p>\n

-38%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

487 <\/p>\n

-31%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Brightness Distribution<\/td>\n\n

95<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

93 <\/p>\n

-2%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

<\/td>\n\n
\n

86 <\/p>\n

-9%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

83 <\/p>\n

-13%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

88 <\/p>\n

-7%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

94 <\/p>\n

-1%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Black Level *<\/td>\n\n

0.07<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

0.0001 <\/p>\n

100%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

0.47 <\/p>\n

-571%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

0.4 <\/p>\n

-471%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

0.35 <\/p>\n

-400%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

0.44 <\/p>\n

-529%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

0.001 <\/p>\n

99%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Contrast<\/td>\n\n

10171<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

6060000 <\/p>\n

59481%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

803 <\/p>\n

-92%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

1278 <\/p>\n

-87%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

1305 <\/p>\n

-87%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

1043 <\/p>\n

-90%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

504000 <\/p>\n

4855%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Colorchecker dE 2000 *<\/td>\n\n

1.7<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

4.8 <\/p>\n

-182%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

3.2 <\/p>\n

-88%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

0.95 <\/p>\n

44%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

3.7 <\/p>\n

-118%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

2.97 <\/p>\n

-75%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

1.5 <\/p>\n

12%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *<\/td>\n\n

4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

8.2 <\/p>\n

-105%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

6.9 <\/p>\n

-73%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

2.07 <\/p>\n

48%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

6.42 <\/p>\n

-61%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

8.13 <\/p>\n

-103%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

3.3 <\/p>\n

17%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *<\/td>\n\n

1.2<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

1.8 <\/p>\n

-50%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

<\/td>\n\n
\n

0.91 <\/p>\n

24%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

0.66 <\/p>\n

45%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

1.03 <\/p>\n

14%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Greyscale dE 2000 *<\/td>\n\n

2.8<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

6.5 <\/p>\n

-132%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

3.9 <\/p>\n

-39%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

0.6 <\/p>\n

79%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

2.6 <\/p>\n

7%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

4.9 <\/p>\n

-75%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

2.1 <\/p>\n

25%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Gamma<\/td>\n\n

2.21 100%<\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.63 84%<\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

<\/td>\n\n

2.176 101%<\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.3 96%<\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.235 98%<\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.25 98%<\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

CCT<\/td>\n\n

6978 93%<\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6596 99%<\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

<\/td>\n\n

6545 99%<\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6108 106%<\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6775 96%<\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6882 94%<\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Total Average (Program \/ Settings)<\/td>\n<\/td>\n\n

2158%<\/span> \/
\n3920%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-86%<\/span> \/
\n-108%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-7%<\/span> \/
\n-28%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-11%<\/span> \/
\n-44%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-23%<\/span> \/
\n-62%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

144%<\/span> \/
\n314%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

* … smaller is better<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The picture quality is already very good out of the box. We analyzed the panel with the professional CalMAN software (X-Rite i1 Pro 2) and both the grayscale as well as color checker performance only show small deviations compared to the P3 reference color space. However, there is a minor blue cast and the color temperature is also a bit on the cool side. Our own calibration (profile can be downloaded for free in the box above) improves the performance even further, so the panel is also suited for picture\/video editing. It is a bit unfortunate that Asus does not include an option to switch to the smaller sRGB gamut.\n<\/p>\n

Update:<\/b> There is a dedciated sRGB profile available in the Armoury Crate software.<\/i><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Display Response Times<\/h3>\n
\n

\u2139<\/p>\n

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>\u2194\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span> Response Time Black to White<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
19 ms<\/span> … rise \u2197 and fall \u2198 combined<\/td>\n\u2197 10.6 ms rise<\/td>\n\n
\u2198 8.4 ms fall<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. \u00bb 31\u00a0% of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.5 ms).<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>\u2194\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span> Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
15.2 ms<\/span> … rise \u2197 and fall \u2198 combined<\/td>\n\u2197 11.2 ms rise<\/td>\n\n
\u2198 4 ms fall<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. \u00bb 19\u00a0% of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.6 ms).<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Screen Flickering \/ PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)<\/h3>\n
\n

\u2139<\/p>\n

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession – a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n
Screen flickering \/ PWM detected <\/span><\/td>\n12000 Hz<\/span><\/td>\n \u2264\u00a0100\u00a0% brightness setting<\/td>\n\n
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

The display backlight flickers at 12000\u00a0Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100\u00a0% and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.<\/p>\n

The frequency of 12000\u00a0Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.<\/p>\n

In comparison: 53\u00a0% of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19343 (minimum: 5 – maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The panel used PWM at all brightness levels, but the frequency of 12 kHz is very high and should not cause any problems. However, the constant PWM flickering makes it very hard to measure response times accurately. Our results are pretty average, but Asus advertises a response time of 3 ms. We did not notice any ghosting in during our tests and the panel is great for gaming.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The matte Mini-LED panel also works great outdoors, which is confirmed by our outdoor pictures. You should obviously avoid reflections from direct light sources, but you can still see the contents very comfortable on sunny days, while you cannot see anything on the glossy secondary screen (~400 nits). The viewing angle stability does not cause any criticism, either.<\/p>\n

\n
\"Viewing<\/a>
Viewing angle stability<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\"Subpixel<\/a>
Subpixel array<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Like last year\u2019s model<\/a>, the secondary screen has a resolution of 3840 x 1100 pixels (14 inches) and is now glossy. Touch inputs are well executed and Asus avoids the problem of different horizontal resolutions by adjusting the scaling factor, which means the width of windows does not change when you switch them from one display to the other. This works reasonably well in practice, but there can be issues when the run apps in full-screen mode (like games), where apps or windows on the second screen can move around.\n<\/p>\n

The brightness is almost 400 nits and the other measurements are also good, but the picture quality cannot keep up with the primary screen. The additional panel is also limited to the smaller sRGB gamut, but we did not detect any PWM flickering.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n384
cd\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n		381
cd\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n		379
cd\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n377
cd\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n		386
cd\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n		377
cd\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n365
cd\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n		349
cd\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n		382
cd\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

Distribution of brightness<\/i><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

X-Rite i1Pro 2<\/p>\n

Maximum: 386\u00a0cd\/m\u00b2 (Nits) Average: 375.6\u00a0cd\/m\u00b2
Brightness Distribution:\u00a090 %
Center on Battery: 386\u00a0cd\/m\u00b2<\/span>
Contrast: 1838:1 (Black: 0.21\u00a0cd\/m\u00b2)
\u0394E Color 1.7 | 0.59-29.43 \u00d85.2
\u0394E Greyscale 1.5 | 0.57-98 \u00d85.4
Gamma: 2.11<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Display Response Times<\/h3>\n
\n

\u2139<\/p>\n

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>\u2194\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span> Response Time Black to White<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
17.2 ms<\/span> … rise \u2197 and fall \u2198 combined<\/td>\n\u2197 7.7 ms rise<\/td>\n\n
\u2198 9.5 ms fall<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. \u00bb 29\u00a0% of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.5 ms).<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>\u2194\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span> Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
32.1 ms<\/span> … rise \u2197 and fall \u2198 combined<\/td>\n\u2197 15.4 ms rise<\/td>\n\n
\u2198 16.7 ms fall<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. \u00bb 33\u00a0% of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (35.6 ms).<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Screen Flickering \/ PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)<\/h3>\n
\n

\u2139<\/p>\n

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession – a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n
Screen flickering \/ PWM not detected<\/span><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n\n
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

In comparison: 53\u00a0% of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19343 (minimum: 5 – maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

\n

All models of the ROG Zephyrus Duo are equipped with the powerful\u00a0AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/a>, but Asus does not use fast RAM and still uses DDR5-4800. We also faced some bugs during our review and we even had some blue screens when we launched AIDA64 benchmarks, for example. You also have to know that the graphics are handled by the dedicated GeForce GPU when you use an external screen. This is caused by the secondary screen, and the GeForce GPU is also running even when both integrated screens are turned off, which will obviously increase the power consumption.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
\n

The preloaded Armoury Crate software offers several power profiles for the ROG Zephyrus Duo 16. It is also possible to adjust the GPU settings in addition to the basic profiles. We got the best overall results with the Turbo profile as well as the default GPU setting (MSHybrid).\u00a0<\/p>\n

\n
\"Armoury<\/a>
Armoury Crate Software<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

The new\u00a0AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (Dragon Range)<\/a>\u00a0uses 16 Zen4 cores (32 threads) and is manufactured in a 5 nm process. It is AMD\u2019s new flagship mobile CPU and is a direct rival for Intel\u2019s current Raptor Lake HX chips. AMD advertises a typical TDP of 55 Watts, but the processor in the ROH Zephyrus Duo 16 can consume up to 130 Watts and 120 Watts for sustained workloads. This means it is much more efficient than Intel\u2019s latest models like the\u00a0Core i9-13980HX<\/a>, which can consume more than 200 Watts in peak load scenarios.\n<\/p>\n

The multi-core performance in particular is very impressive and the Ryzen 9 7945HX can take the top spot in almost every benchmark. Intel\u2019s current CPUs only have a slight advantage in single-core tests, but also consume more power in these scenarios. We will offer a detailed comparison of the performance and efficiency between the new AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX and the Raptor Lake HX CPUs in a separate comparison article.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n0<\/text>280<\/text>560<\/text>840<\/text>1120<\/text>1400<\/text>1680<\/text>1960<\/text>2240<\/text>2520<\/text>2800<\/text>3080<\/text>3360<\/text>3640<\/text>3920<\/text>4200<\/text>4480<\/text>4760<\/text>5040<\/text>5320<\/text><\/g>Tooltip<\/text><\/svg><\/p>\n
\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13980HX: \u00d84987 (4917.63-5171.97) <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\"CPU<\/a>
CPU data Cinebench R15 Multi loop<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

The CPU performance is almost completely stable under sustained workloads, but you have to expect a performance deficit of around 50 % in multi-core tests running on battery (the single-core performance is not affected). Compared to the\u00a0Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/a>\u00a0in the old\u00a0Zephyrus Duo 16<\/a>, the CPU performance has increased by 68 % across all CPU benchmarks. More benchmark results are available in our tech section<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
CPU Performance Rating<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13980HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>84.5<\/span> pt \u223c85%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>82.7<\/span> pt \u223c83%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>82.5<\/span> pt \u223c83%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>80.7<\/span> pt \u223c81%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>80.4<\/span> pt \u223c80%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>78.5<\/span> pt \u223c79%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>72.3<\/span> pt \u223c72%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS<\/a>
Intel Core i9-12900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>67.6<\/span> pt \u223c68%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max<\/a> -6! <\/sup>
Apple M2 Max<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>60.4<\/span> pt \u223c60%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>49.3<\/span> pt \u223c49%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>48.1<\/span> pt \u223c48%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Cinebench R23 \/ Multi Core<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>34521<\/span> (32987.6min<\/sup> – 34521.3max<\/sup>)<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>33277<\/span> Points \u223c96%<\/span><\/span> -4%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13980HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>33052<\/span> Points \u223c96%<\/span><\/span> -4%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (31534 – 34521, n=2)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>33028<\/span> Points \u223c96%<\/span><\/span> -4%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>30162<\/span> Points \u223c87%<\/span><\/span> -13%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>28707<\/span> (26191.7min<\/sup> – 28706.8max<\/sup>)<\/span> Points \u223c83%<\/span><\/span> -17%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>28010<\/span> (26406.1min<\/sup> – 28009.8max<\/sup>)<\/span> Points \u223c81%<\/span><\/span> -19%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>26703<\/span> Points \u223c77%<\/span><\/span> -23%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>26736<\/span> (22394.1min<\/sup> – 26736.1max<\/sup>)<\/span> Points \u223c77%<\/span><\/span> -23%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS<\/a>
Intel Core i9-12900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>22982<\/span> Points \u223c67%<\/span><\/span> -33%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (2435 – 34521, n=226, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>15051<\/span> Points \u223c44%<\/span><\/span> -56%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max<\/a>
Apple M2 Max<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>14767<\/span> Points \u223c43%<\/span><\/span> -57%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>14085<\/span> Points \u223c41%<\/span><\/span> -59%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Cinebench R23 \/ Single Core<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13980HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>2169<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +12%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>2100<\/span> Points \u223c97%<\/span><\/span> +8%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>2055<\/span> Points \u223c95%<\/span><\/span> +6%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>2043<\/span> Points \u223c94%<\/span><\/span> +5%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>2029<\/span> Points \u223c94%<\/span><\/span> +5%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1940<\/span> Points \u223c89%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS<\/a>
Intel Core i9-12900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1913<\/span> Points \u223c88%<\/span><\/span> -1%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (1863 – 1940, n=2)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>1902<\/span> Points \u223c88%<\/span><\/span> -2%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max<\/a>
Apple M2 Max<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1625<\/span> Points \u223c75%<\/span><\/span> -16%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (527 – 2169, n=223, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>1624<\/span> Points \u223c75%<\/span><\/span> -16%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1566<\/span> Points \u223c72%<\/span><\/span> -19%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Cinebench R20 \/ CPU (Multi Core)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>13457<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>12648<\/span> Points \u223c94%<\/span><\/span> -6%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13980HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>12437<\/span> Points \u223c92%<\/span><\/span> -8%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (10025 – 13457, n=2)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>11741<\/span> Points \u223c87%<\/span><\/span> -13%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>11500<\/span> Points \u223c85%<\/span><\/span> -15%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>11289<\/span> Points \u223c84%<\/span><\/span> -16%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>8697<\/span> Points \u223c65%<\/span><\/span> -35%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS<\/a>
Intel Core i9-12900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>8667<\/span> Points \u223c64%<\/span><\/span> -36%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (930 – 13457, n=230, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>5666<\/span> Points \u223c42%<\/span><\/span> -58%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>5489<\/span> Points \u223c41%<\/span><\/span> -59%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max<\/a>
Apple M2 Max<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>4044<\/span> Points \u223c30%<\/span><\/span> -70%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Cinebench R20 \/ CPU (Single Core)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13980HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>825<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +9%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>803<\/span> Points \u223c97%<\/span><\/span> +6%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>788<\/span> Points \u223c96%<\/span><\/span> +4%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>756<\/span> Points \u223c92%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>756<\/span> Points \u223c92%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>742<\/span> Points \u223c90%<\/span><\/span> -2%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS<\/a>
Intel Core i9-12900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>738<\/span> Points \u223c89%<\/span><\/span> -2%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (712 – 756, n=2)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>734<\/span> Points \u223c89%<\/span><\/span> -3%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (169 – 825, n=230, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>625<\/span> Points \u223c76%<\/span><\/span> -17%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>595<\/span> Points \u223c72%<\/span><\/span> -21%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max<\/a>
Apple M2 Max<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>460<\/span> Points \u223c56%<\/span><\/span> -39%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Cinebench R15 \/ CPU Multi 64Bit<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>5554<\/span> (5255.55min<\/sup> – 5554.01max<\/sup>)<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (5205 – 5554, n=3)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>5406<\/span> Points \u223c97%<\/span><\/span> -3%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>5227<\/span> (4889.98min<\/sup> – 5226.71max<\/sup>)<\/span> Points \u223c94%<\/span><\/span> -6%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13980HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>5172<\/span> (4917.63min<\/sup> – 5171.97max<\/sup>)<\/span> Points \u223c93%<\/span><\/span> -7%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>4913<\/span> Points \u223c88%<\/span><\/span> -12%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>4875<\/span> (4298.3min<\/sup> – 4875.08max<\/sup>)<\/span> Points \u223c88%<\/span><\/span> -12%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>4819<\/span> (4429.68min<\/sup> – 4819.28max<\/sup>)<\/span> Points \u223c87%<\/span><\/span> -13%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n <\/span>4529<\/span> (4463.29min<\/sup> – 4528.99max<\/sup>)<\/span> Points \u223c82%<\/span><\/span> -18%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS<\/a>
Intel Core i9-12900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>3570<\/span> (3259.45min<\/sup> – 3569.52max<\/sup>)<\/span> Points \u223c64%<\/span><\/span> -36%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (400 – 5554, n=235, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>2420<\/span> Points \u223c44%<\/span><\/span> -56%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>2292<\/span> Points \u223c41%<\/span><\/span> -59%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max<\/a>
Apple M2 Max<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>2074<\/span> (2068.47min<\/sup>, 2068.57P1<\/sup> – 2081.27max<\/sup>)<\/span> Points \u223c37%<\/span><\/span> -63%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Cinebench R15 \/ CPU Single 64Bit<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13980HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>312<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +2%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>307<\/span> Points \u223c98%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>301<\/span> Points \u223c96%<\/span><\/span> -2%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (294 – 307, n=3)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>301<\/span> Points \u223c96%<\/span><\/span> -2%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>300<\/span> Points \u223c96%<\/span><\/span> -2%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>295<\/span> Points \u223c95%<\/span><\/span> -4%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>294<\/span> Points \u223c94%<\/span><\/span> -4%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS<\/a>
Intel Core i9-12900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>278<\/span> Points \u223c89%<\/span><\/span> -9%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>274<\/span> Points \u223c88%<\/span><\/span> -11%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>249<\/span> Points \u223c80%<\/span><\/span> -19%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (79.2 – 312, n=231, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>245<\/span> Points \u223c79%<\/span><\/span> -20%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max<\/a>
Apple M2 Max<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>239<\/span> Points \u223c77%<\/span><\/span> -22%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Blender \/ v2.79 BMW27 CPU<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (93 – 1259, n=232, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>247<\/span> Seconds * \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> -166%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>220<\/span> Seconds * \u223c89%<\/span><\/span> -137%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS<\/a>
Intel Core i9-12900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>147<\/span> Seconds * \u223c60%<\/span><\/span> -58%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>114<\/span> Seconds * \u223c46%<\/span><\/span> -23%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>111<\/span> Seconds * \u223c45%<\/span><\/span> -19%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>105<\/span> Seconds * \u223c43%<\/span><\/span> -13%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13980HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>101<\/span> Seconds * \u223c41%<\/span><\/span> -9%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>100<\/span> Seconds * \u223c40%<\/span><\/span> -8%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (93 – 100, n=2)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>96.5<\/span> Seconds * \u223c39%<\/span><\/span> -4%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>93<\/span> Seconds * \u223c38%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
7-Zip 18.03 \/ 7z b 4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>135927<\/span> MIPS \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (123364 – 135927, n=2)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>129646<\/span> MIPS \u223c95%<\/span><\/span> -5%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>127295<\/span> MIPS \u223c94%<\/span><\/span> -6%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13980HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>125720<\/span> MIPS \u223c92%<\/span><\/span> -8%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>122254<\/span> MIPS \u223c90%<\/span><\/span> -10%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>118715<\/span> MIPS \u223c87%<\/span><\/span> -13%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>109330<\/span> MIPS \u223c80%<\/span><\/span> -20%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS<\/a>
Intel Core i9-12900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>86234<\/span> MIPS \u223c63%<\/span><\/span> -37%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>64457<\/span> MIPS \u223c47%<\/span><\/span> -53%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (11386 – 135927, n=227, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>61467<\/span> MIPS \u223c45%<\/span><\/span> -55%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
7-Zip 18.03 \/ 7z b 4 -mmt1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Average<\/span> AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (7319 – 7332, n=2)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>7326<\/span> MIPS \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>7319<\/span> MIPS \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>7035<\/span> MIPS \u223c96%<\/span><\/span> -4%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13980HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>7018<\/span> MIPS \u223c96%<\/span><\/span> -4%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>6897<\/span> MIPS \u223c94%<\/span><\/span> -6%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>6800<\/span> MIPS \u223c93%<\/span><\/span> -7%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>6445<\/span> MIPS \u223c88%<\/span><\/span> -12%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS<\/a>
Intel Core i9-12900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>6256<\/span> MIPS \u223c85%<\/span><\/span> -15%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>5727<\/span> MIPS \u223c78%<\/span><\/span> -22%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (2685 – 7332, n=228, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>5707<\/span> MIPS \u223c78%<\/span><\/span> -22%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Geekbench 5.4 \/ Multi-Core<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>21058<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +8%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>20784<\/span> Points \u223c99%<\/span><\/span> +6%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>20634<\/span> Points \u223c98%<\/span><\/span> +5%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13980HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>20329<\/span> Points \u223c97%<\/span><\/span> +4%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>19583<\/span> Points \u223c93%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (18372 – 19583, n=2)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>18978<\/span> Points \u223c90%<\/span><\/span> -3%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>18152<\/span> Points \u223c86%<\/span><\/span> -7%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS<\/a>
Intel Core i9-12900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>16250<\/span> Points \u223c77%<\/span><\/span> -17%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max<\/a>
Apple M2 Max<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>15348<\/span> Points \u223c73%<\/span><\/span> -22%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (1946 – 21058, n=226, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>10772<\/span> Points \u223c51%<\/span><\/span> -45%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>10167<\/span> Points \u223c48%<\/span><\/span> -48%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Geekbench 5.4 \/ Single-Core<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13980HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>2139<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>2132<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (2053 – 2132, n=2)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>2093<\/span> Points \u223c98%<\/span><\/span> -2%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>2043<\/span> Points \u223c96%<\/span><\/span> -4%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>2025<\/span> Points \u223c95%<\/span><\/span> -5%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>2023<\/span> Points \u223c95%<\/span><\/span> -5%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max<\/a>
Apple M2 Max<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1978<\/span> Points \u223c92%<\/span><\/span> -7%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS<\/a>
Intel Core i9-12900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1923<\/span> Points \u223c90%<\/span><\/span> -10%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1805<\/span> Points \u223c84%<\/span><\/span> -15%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (158 – 2139, n=226, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>1635<\/span> Points \u223c76%<\/span><\/span> -23%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1594<\/span> Points \u223c75%<\/span><\/span> -25%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 \/ 4k Preset<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>34.8<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (33.8 – 34.8, n=2)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>34.3<\/span> fps \u223c99%<\/span><\/span> -1%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13980HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>33.4<\/span> fps \u223c96%<\/span><\/span> -4%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>32.7<\/span> fps \u223c94%<\/span><\/span> -6%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>31.9<\/span> fps \u223c92%<\/span><\/span> -8%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>30.9<\/span> fps \u223c89%<\/span><\/span> -11%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>28.7<\/span> fps \u223c82%<\/span><\/span> -18%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS<\/a>
Intel Core i9-12900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>25.6<\/span> fps \u223c74%<\/span><\/span> -26%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>18<\/span> fps \u223c52%<\/span><\/span> -48%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (3 – 34.8, n=232, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>17.1<\/span> fps \u223c49%<\/span><\/span> -51%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
LibreOffice \/ 20 Documents To PDF<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>60.4<\/span> s * \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (45.7 – 60.4, n=2)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>53.1<\/span> s * \u223c88%<\/span><\/span> +12%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (32.8 – 332, n=228, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>51.4<\/span> s * \u223c85%<\/span><\/span> +15%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>47.5<\/span> s * \u223c79%<\/span><\/span> +21%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>46.5<\/span> s * \u223c77%<\/span><\/span> +23%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>46<\/span> s * \u223c76%<\/span><\/span> +24%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>45<\/span> s * \u223c75%<\/span><\/span> +25%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>44<\/span> s * \u223c73%<\/span><\/span> +27%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS<\/a>
Intel Core i9-12900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>39<\/span> s * \u223c65%<\/span><\/span> +35%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13980HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>36.7<\/span> s * \u223c61%<\/span><\/span> +39%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
R Benchmark 2.5 \/ Overall mean<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (0.3793 – 4.47, n=228, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>0.517<\/span> sec * \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> -30%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>0.4799<\/span> sec * \u223c93%<\/span><\/span> -21%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS<\/a>
Intel Core i9-12900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>0.4194<\/span> sec * \u223c81%<\/span><\/span> -5%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>0.4121<\/span> sec * \u223c80%<\/span><\/span> -3%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (0.3982 – 0.4159, n=2)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>0.4071<\/span> sec * \u223c79%<\/span><\/span> -2%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>0.4033<\/span> sec * \u223c78%<\/span><\/span> -1%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13980HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>0.4008<\/span> sec * \u223c78%<\/span><\/span> -1%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>0.3982<\/span> sec * \u223c77%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>0.3979<\/span> sec * \u223c77%<\/span><\/span> -0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>0.3866<\/span> sec * \u223c75%<\/span><\/span> +3%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n

* … smaller is better<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit<\/p>\n

21698 <\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit<\/p>\n

71582 <\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit<\/p>\n

8481 <\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit<\/p>\n

3.65 Points<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit<\/p>\n

64.29 Points<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit<\/p>\n

182.2 fps<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit<\/p>\n

307 Points<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit<\/p>\n

99.6 %<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit<\/p>\n

283 fps<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit<\/p>\n

5554 Points<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Help<\/abbr><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Except for the previously mentioned blue screens, we also noticed some software bugs during our review period. There were issues with the Bluetooth connection (we occasionally had to open the Bluetooth menu before our mouse worked) and YouTube sometimes did not play any videos, which was solved by a restart. We are currently not sure whether these are software issues caused by Asus or initial issues with the new AMD platform.\n<\/p>\n

If everything works as designed (which is the case most of the time), the performance is really good. There are no stutters and all inputs are executed without delays. The results in the synthetic benchmarks are also excellent and the AMD system can beat most Intel rivals.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
PCMark 10 \/ Score<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>9151<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>9151<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>8884<\/span> Points \u223c97%<\/span><\/span> -3%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>7888<\/span> Points \u223c86%<\/span><\/span> -14%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>7830<\/span> Points \u223c86%<\/span><\/span> -14%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (4477 – 9151, n=188, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>7124<\/span> Points \u223c78%<\/span><\/span> -22%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>6351<\/span> Points \u223c69%<\/span><\/span> -31%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
PCMark 10 \/ Essentials<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>12176<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>12176<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>11761<\/span> Points \u223c97%<\/span><\/span> -3%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>11703<\/span> Points \u223c96%<\/span><\/span> -4%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>11078<\/span> Points \u223c91%<\/span><\/span> -9%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (7334 – 12639, n=187, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>10334<\/span> Points \u223c85%<\/span><\/span> -15%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>9374<\/span> Points \u223c77%<\/span><\/span> -23%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
PCMark 10 \/ Productivity<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>11833<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>11833<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>10788<\/span> Points \u223c91%<\/span><\/span> -9%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>9851<\/span> Points \u223c83%<\/span><\/span> -17%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (6161 – 11833, n=187, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>9308<\/span> Points \u223c79%<\/span><\/span> -21%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>8271<\/span> Points \u223c70%<\/span><\/span> -30%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>7704<\/span> Points \u223c65%<\/span><\/span> -35%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
PCMark 10 \/ Digital Content Creation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>16424<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +14%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>14535<\/span> Points \u223c88%<\/span><\/span> +1%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>14432<\/span> Points \u223c88%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>14432<\/span> Points \u223c88%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>10319<\/span> Points \u223c63%<\/span><\/span> -28%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (5288 – 16424, n=187, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>10243<\/span> Points \u223c62%<\/span><\/span> -29%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>9626<\/span> Points \u223c59%<\/span><\/span> -33%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
CrossMark \/ Overall<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>2139<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +3%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>2078<\/span> Points \u223c97%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>2078<\/span> Points \u223c97%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1993<\/span> Points \u223c93%<\/span><\/span> -4%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max<\/a>
M2 Max 38-Core GPU, M2 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1910<\/span> Points \u223c89%<\/span><\/span> -8%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (974 – 2195, n=92, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>1818<\/span> Points \u223c85%<\/span><\/span> -13%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1711<\/span> Points \u223c80%<\/span><\/span> -18%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1592<\/span> Points \u223c74%<\/span><\/span> -23%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
CrossMark \/ Productivity<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1977<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +2%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1946<\/span> Points \u223c98%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>1946<\/span> Points \u223c98%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1820<\/span> Points \u223c92%<\/span><\/span> -6%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (907 – 2062, n=92, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>1746<\/span> Points \u223c88%<\/span><\/span> -10%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1698<\/span> Points \u223c86%<\/span><\/span> -13%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max<\/a>
M2 Max 38-Core GPU, M2 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1618<\/span> Points \u223c82%<\/span><\/span> -17%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1509<\/span> Points \u223c76%<\/span><\/span> -22%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
CrossMark \/ Creativity<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max<\/a>
M2 Max 38-Core GPU, M2 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>2505<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +5%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>2423<\/span> Points \u223c97%<\/span><\/span> +2%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>2384<\/span> Points \u223c95%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>2377<\/span> Points \u223c95%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>2377<\/span> Points \u223c95%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (1027 – 2514, n=92, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>1949<\/span> Points \u223c78%<\/span><\/span> -18%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1780<\/span> Points \u223c71%<\/span><\/span> -25%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1724<\/span> Points \u223c69%<\/span><\/span> -27%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
CrossMark \/ Responsiveness<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1861<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +10%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1715<\/span> Points \u223c92%<\/span><\/span> +2%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1689<\/span> Points \u223c91%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>1689<\/span> Points \u223c91%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (1029 – 2230, n=92, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>1683<\/span> Points \u223c90%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1528<\/span> Points \u223c82%<\/span><\/span> -10%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max<\/a>
M2 Max 38-Core GPU, M2 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1395<\/span> Points \u223c75%<\/span><\/span> -17%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1342<\/span> Points \u223c72%<\/span><\/span> -21%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

\n\n\n\n\n
PCMark 10 Score<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n9151\u00a0points<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Help<\/abbr><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Our standardized Latency test (web browsing, YouTube 4K playback, CPU load) shows significant limitations for the test unit with the current BIOS version, so it is not suited for real-time audio applications.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
DPC Latencies \/ LatencyMon – interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>5418.4<\/span> \u03bcs * \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>4710.9<\/span> \u03bcs * \u223c87%<\/span><\/span> +13%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>2448.6<\/span> \u03bcs * \u223c45%<\/span><\/span> +55%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>521.5<\/span> \u03bcs * \u223c10%<\/span><\/span> +90%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>437.7<\/span> \u03bcs * \u223c8%<\/span><\/span> +92%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n

* … smaller is better<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\"Free<\/a>
Free M.2-2280 slot<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

Our review unit is equipped with a fast 2 TB SSD from SK Hynix (PC801), which is attached via PCIe 4.0. The performance of the NVMe drive is excellent and we transfer rates of more than 7 GB\/s. The performance is also stable under sustained workloads, which is a problem for many high-end laptops right now. More SSD benchmarks are listed here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

CDM 5\/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
\n7107 MB\/s<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

CDM 5\/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
\n6036 MB\/s<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

CDM 5\/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
\n532 MB\/s<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

CDM 5\/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
\n585 MB\/s<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

CDM 5\/6 Read 4K:
\n64.4 MB\/s<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

CDM 5\/6 Write 4K:
\n163.9 MB\/s<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8:
\n486 MB\/s<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8:
\n1278 MB\/s<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Drive Performance Rating – Percent<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>77.6<\/span> pt \u223c78%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>74.8<\/span> pt \u223c75%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>67.8<\/span> pt \u223c68%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>57.9<\/span> pt \u223c58%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>57.9<\/span> pt \u223c58%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
SSSTC CA6-8D1024<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>57.6<\/span> pt \u223c58%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>52.9<\/span> pt \u223c53%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a> -11! <\/sup>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>40.7<\/span> pt \u223c41%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
DiskSpd<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
seq read<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>5598<\/span> (5462.22min<\/sup> – 5597.85max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +103%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>4903<\/span> MB\/s \u223c88%<\/span><\/span> +78%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>4525<\/span> (4498.41min<\/sup> – 4525.41max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c81%<\/span><\/span> +64%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
SSSTC CA6-8D1024<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>3844<\/span> (3257.93min<\/sup> – 3843.87max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c69%<\/span><\/span> +39%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n <\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>3180<\/span> (3109.94min<\/sup> – 3179.84max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c57%<\/span><\/span> +15%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (834 – 5676, n=186, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>3070<\/span> MB\/s \u223c55%<\/span><\/span> +11%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>2756<\/span> (2741.19min<\/sup> – 2756.29max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c49%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>2756<\/span> MB\/s \u223c49%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

seq write<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>7889<\/span> (6495.73min<\/sup> – 7888.81max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +86%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>7533<\/span> (7482.85min<\/sup> – 7532.79max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c95%<\/span><\/span> +77%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>4378<\/span> (4355.78min<\/sup> – 4378.43max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c55%<\/span><\/span> +3%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>4250<\/span> (4204.35min<\/sup> – 4249.88max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c54%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>4250<\/span> MB\/s \u223c54%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>3434<\/span> (3027.24min<\/sup> – 3434.35max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c44%<\/span><\/span> -19%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (399 – 7889, n=185, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>3265<\/span> MB\/s \u223c41%<\/span><\/span> -23%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
SSSTC CA6-8D1024<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>3242<\/span> (1498min<\/sup> – 3241.78max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c41%<\/span><\/span> -24%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

seq q8 t1 read<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>11242<\/span> (10740.3min<\/sup> – 11242.2max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +60%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>10557<\/span> (9742.97min<\/sup> – 10557.3max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c94%<\/span><\/span> +50%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>7048<\/span> (6068.56min<\/sup> – 7047.9max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c63%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>7048<\/span> MB\/s \u223c63%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
SSSTC CA6-8D1024<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>6872<\/span> (4963.33min<\/sup> – 6872.25max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c61%<\/span><\/span> -2%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>6682<\/span> (5778.28min<\/sup> – 6681.95max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c59%<\/span><\/span> -5%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>6637<\/span> (5645.11min<\/sup> – 6636.65max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c59%<\/span><\/span> -6%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (1620 – 13195, n=186, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>5317<\/span> MB\/s \u223c47%<\/span><\/span> -25%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

seq q8 t1 write<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>9942<\/span> (9912.92min<\/sup> – 9941.76max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +66%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>9830<\/span> (9799.27min<\/sup> – 9829.82max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c99%<\/span><\/span> +64%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>6004<\/span> (5933.65min<\/sup> – 6004.3max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c60%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>6004<\/span> MB\/s \u223c60%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>4985<\/span> (4706.66min<\/sup> – 4985.24max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c50%<\/span><\/span> -17%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>4943<\/span> (4923.06min<\/sup> – 4943.2max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c50%<\/span><\/span> -18%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
SSSTC CA6-8D1024<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>4244<\/span> (427.59min<\/sup> – 4244.22max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c43%<\/span><\/span> -29%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (86.2 – 10261, n=186, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>4002<\/span> MB\/s \u223c40%<\/span><\/span> -33%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

4k q1 t1 read<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>95.3<\/span> (93.25min<\/sup> – 95.25max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +48%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>83.1<\/span> (79.37min<\/sup> – 83.07max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c87%<\/span><\/span> +29%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>73.1<\/span> (72.79min<\/sup> – 73.06max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c77%<\/span><\/span> +14%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (23.3 – 97.4, n=186, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>64.6<\/span> MB\/s \u223c68%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>64.3<\/span> (63.09min<\/sup> – 64.34max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c67%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>64.3<\/span> MB\/s \u223c67%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
SSSTC CA6-8D1024<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>56.5<\/span> (49.8min<\/sup> – 56.49max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c59%<\/span><\/span> -12%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>46.6<\/span> (45.38min<\/sup> – 46.63max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c49%<\/span><\/span> -28%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

4k q1 t1 write<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>359<\/span> (324.09min<\/sup> – 358.58max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +119%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>255<\/span> (243.79min<\/sup> – 255.25max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c71%<\/span><\/span> +55%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
SSSTC CA6-8D1024<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>220<\/span> (56.84min<\/sup> – 219.56max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c61%<\/span><\/span> +34%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>213<\/span> (205.52min<\/sup> – 212.72max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c59%<\/span><\/span> +30%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (66.6 – 421, n=185, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>201<\/span> MB\/s \u223c56%<\/span><\/span> +22%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>164.3<\/span> (163.26min<\/sup> – 164.34max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c46%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>164.3<\/span> MB\/s \u223c46%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>108.4<\/span> (106.69min<\/sup> – 108.4max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c30%<\/span><\/span> -34%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

4k q32 t16 read<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>4100<\/span> (4085.58min<\/sup> – 4100.1max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +254%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
SSSTC CA6-8D1024<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>3111<\/span> (2388.54min<\/sup> – 3111.42max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c76%<\/span><\/span> +169%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>2390<\/span> (2226.95min<\/sup> – 2390.15max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c58%<\/span><\/span> +106%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (310 – 5829, n=185, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>2293<\/span> MB\/s \u223c56%<\/span><\/span> +98%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>1469<\/span> (1266.81min<\/sup> – 1469.47max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c36%<\/span><\/span> +27%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>1158<\/span> (1132.18min<\/sup> – 1157.71max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c28%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>1158<\/span> MB\/s \u223c28%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>973<\/span> (941.21min<\/sup> – 972.98max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c24%<\/span><\/span> -16%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

4k q32 t16 write<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>3537<\/span> (3519.01min<\/sup> – 3536.66max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +635%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (288 – 4383, n=185, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>2019<\/span> MB\/s \u223c57%<\/span><\/span> +320%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>1542<\/span> (1501.74min<\/sup> – 1541.63max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c44%<\/span><\/span> +221%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>1424<\/span> (1251.47min<\/sup> – 1423.75max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c40%<\/span><\/span> +196%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
SSSTC CA6-8D1024<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>1282<\/span> (960.6min<\/sup> – 1281.78max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c36%<\/span><\/span> +167%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>481<\/span> (462.66min<\/sup> – 481.19max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c14%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>481<\/span> MB\/s \u223c14%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>460<\/span> (453.59min<\/sup> – 459.8max<\/sup>)<\/span> MB\/s \u223c13%<\/span><\/span> -4%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
AS SSD<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Score Total<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>8224<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +28%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
SSSTC CA6-8D1024<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>7311<\/span> Points \u223c89%<\/span><\/span> +14%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>6635<\/span> Points \u223c81%<\/span><\/span> +3%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>6435<\/span> Points \u223c78%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>6435<\/span> Points \u223c78%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (910 – 10330, n=175, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>6199<\/span> Points \u223c75%<\/span><\/span> -4%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>4850<\/span> Points \u223c59%<\/span><\/span> -25%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Score Read<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
SSSTC CA6-8D1024<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>3308<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +113%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>3188<\/span> Points \u223c96%<\/span><\/span> +105%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>2619<\/span> Points \u223c79%<\/span><\/span> +69%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (389 – 3629, n=175, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>2316<\/span> Points \u223c70%<\/span><\/span> +49%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>2035<\/span> Points \u223c62%<\/span><\/span> +31%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1554<\/span> Points \u223c47%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>1554<\/span> Points \u223c47%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Score Write<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>4164<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>4164<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>3468<\/span> Points \u223c83%<\/span><\/span> -17%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (338 – 5157, n=175, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>2740<\/span> Points \u223c66%<\/span><\/span> -34%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>2556<\/span> Points \u223c61%<\/span><\/span> -39%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
SSSTC CA6-8D1024<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>2428<\/span> Points \u223c58%<\/span><\/span> -42%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1877<\/span> Points \u223c45%<\/span><\/span> -55%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Seq Read<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>9511<\/span> MB\/s \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +67%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>5689<\/span> MB\/s \u223c60%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>5689<\/span> MB\/s \u223c60%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>5429.33<\/span> MB\/s \u223c57%<\/span><\/span> -5%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>5344.88<\/span> MB\/s \u223c56%<\/span><\/span> -6%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
SSSTC CA6-8D1024<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>5144.76<\/span> MB\/s \u223c54%<\/span><\/span> -10%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (925 – 9971, n=175, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>4208<\/span> MB\/s \u223c44%<\/span><\/span> -26%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Seq Write<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>7663.27<\/span> MB\/s \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +96%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>7181<\/span> MB\/s \u223c94%<\/span><\/span> +84%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>4064.76<\/span> MB\/s \u223c53%<\/span><\/span> +4%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>3904<\/span> MB\/s \u223c51%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>3904<\/span> MB\/s \u223c51%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
SSSTC CA6-8D1024<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>3058.47<\/span> MB\/s \u223c40%<\/span><\/span> -22%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (308 – 8590, n=175, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>3055<\/span> MB\/s \u223c40%<\/span><\/span> -22%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

4K Read<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>85.9<\/span> MB\/s \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +45%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>72.8<\/span> MB\/s \u223c85%<\/span><\/span> +23%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>68.93<\/span> MB\/s \u223c80%<\/span><\/span> +16%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (20 – 108, n=175, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>62.6<\/span> MB\/s \u223c73%<\/span><\/span> +6%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>59.2<\/span> MB\/s \u223c69%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>59.2<\/span> MB\/s \u223c69%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
SSSTC CA6-8D1024<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>49.65<\/span> MB\/s \u223c58%<\/span><\/span> -16%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

4K Write<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>328.69<\/span> MB\/s \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +73%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>205.06<\/span> MB\/s \u223c62%<\/span><\/span> +8%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>189.7<\/span> MB\/s \u223c58%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>189.7<\/span> MB\/s \u223c58%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (18 – 364, n=175, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>181.1<\/span> MB\/s \u223c55%<\/span><\/span> -5%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>177.9<\/span> MB\/s \u223c54%<\/span><\/span> -6%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
SSSTC CA6-8D1024<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>144.8<\/span> MB\/s \u223c44%<\/span><\/span> -24%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

4K-64 Read<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
SSSTC CA6-8D1024<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>2744.3<\/span> MB\/s \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +197%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>2558.72<\/span> MB\/s \u223c93%<\/span><\/span> +177%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>2015.68<\/span> MB\/s \u223c73%<\/span><\/span> +118%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (216 – 2963, n=175, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>1832<\/span> MB\/s \u223c67%<\/span><\/span> +98%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1011<\/span> MB\/s \u223c37%<\/span><\/span> +9%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>925<\/span> MB\/s \u223c34%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>925<\/span> MB\/s \u223c34%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

4K-64 Write<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>3584<\/span> MB\/s \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>3584<\/span> MB\/s \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>2856.24<\/span> MB\/s \u223c80%<\/span><\/span> -20%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (243 – 4381, n=175, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>2265<\/span> MB\/s \u223c63%<\/span><\/span> -37%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
SSSTC CA6-8D1024<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1944.47<\/span> MB\/s \u223c54%<\/span><\/span> -46%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1460.96<\/span> MB\/s \u223c41%<\/span><\/span> -59%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>981<\/span> MB\/s \u223c27%<\/span><\/span> -73%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Access Time Read<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (0.02 – 0.23, n=170, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>0.05671<\/span> ms * \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> -96%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>0.053<\/span> ms * \u223c93%<\/span><\/span> -83%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>0.036<\/span> ms * \u223c63%<\/span><\/span> -24%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>0.029<\/span> ms * \u223c51%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>0.029<\/span> ms * \u223c51%<\/span><\/span> -0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
SSSTC CA6-8D1024<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>0.028<\/span> ms * \u223c49%<\/span><\/span> +3%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>0.025<\/span> ms * \u223c44%<\/span><\/span> +14%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Access Time Write<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
SSSTC CA6-8D1024<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>0.082<\/span> ms * \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> -290%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (0.012 – 0.425, n=175, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>0.0566<\/span> ms * \u223c69%<\/span><\/span> -170%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>0.023<\/span> ms * \u223c28%<\/span><\/span> -10%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>0.021<\/span> ms * \u223c26%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>0.021<\/span> ms * \u223c26%<\/span><\/span> -0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>0.019<\/span> ms * \u223c23%<\/span><\/span> +10%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>0.013<\/span> ms * \u223c16%<\/span><\/span> +38%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n

* … smaller is better<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n0<\/text>355<\/text>710<\/text>1065<\/text>1420<\/text>1775<\/text>2130<\/text>2485<\/text>2840<\/text>3195<\/text>3550<\/text>3905<\/text>4260<\/text>4615<\/text>4970<\/text>5325<\/text>5680<\/text>6035<\/text>6390<\/text>6745<\/text><\/g>Tooltip<\/text><\/svg><\/div>\n
\n
\n
\"GPU-Z<\/a>
GPU-Z Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Asus offers the new ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 with the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop or the GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop like on our review unit right now. In theory, it is the fastest version of the GPU, but the maximum TGP of 175 Watts (150W TGP + 25W Dynamic Boost) is reserved for the manual power profile. The Turbo profile, which was used for all the benchmarks, is limited to 155 Watts (140W TGP + 15W Dynamic Boost).\n<\/p>\n

This means the\u00a0RTX 4090 Laptop<\/a>\u00a0in the Zephyrus Duo 16 in Turbo mode cannot quite keep up with the fastest rivals like the Titan GT77 and is usually only a couple of percent points faster than the GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop. The\u00a0RTX 3080 Ti<\/a>\u00a0in the previous Zephyrus Duo 16<\/a> is clearly beaten in all tests (55-78 % faster). The compute performance is also very good and the RTX 4090 Laptop can also rival professional mobile GPU in some SPECviewperf tests. Please see our comprehensive analysis<\/a> of the RTX 4090 Laptop and RTX 4080 Laptop for more test results.\n<\/p>\n

The GPU performance is stable under sustained workloads and the Time Spy stress test is passed at 97.8 %. However, the power consumption of the GPU is limited to 55W on battery power, which results in a performance deficit of more than 50 % (Time Spy Graphics: 9575 points).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
3DMark 11 – 1280×720 Performance GPU<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>71432<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +15%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>69211<\/span> Points \u223c97%<\/span><\/span> +11%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (58891 – 71432, n=8)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>65225<\/span> Points \u223c91%<\/span><\/span> +5%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>62240<\/span> Points \u223c87%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>60038<\/span> Points \u223c84%<\/span><\/span> -4%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>56565<\/span> Points \u223c79%<\/span><\/span> -9%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>44906<\/span> Points \u223c63%<\/span><\/span> -28%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>40257<\/span> Points \u223c56%<\/span><\/span> -35%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (1029 – 71432, n=222, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>34398<\/span> Points \u223c48%<\/span><\/span> -45%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
3DMark<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1920×1080 Fire Strike Graphics<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>49247<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +3%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>47798<\/span> Points \u223c97%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (44568 – 49247, n=10)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>46959<\/span> Points \u223c95%<\/span><\/span> -2%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>46240<\/span> Points \u223c94%<\/span><\/span> -3%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>43525<\/span> Points \u223c88%<\/span><\/span> -9%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>40570<\/span> Points \u223c82%<\/span><\/span> -15%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>34439<\/span> Points \u223c70%<\/span><\/span> -28%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>27562<\/span> Points \u223c56%<\/span><\/span> -42%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (781 – 49247, n=234, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>25966<\/span> Points \u223c53%<\/span><\/span> -46%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

2560×1440 Time Spy Graphics<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>22254<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +11%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>21786<\/span> Points \u223c98%<\/span><\/span> +9%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (17650 – 22479, n=10)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>20904<\/span> Points \u223c94%<\/span><\/span> +4%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>20033<\/span> Points \u223c90%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>18441<\/span> Points \u223c83%<\/span><\/span> -8%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>18417<\/span> Points \u223c83%<\/span><\/span> -8%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>13554<\/span> Points \u223c61%<\/span><\/span> -32%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>11227<\/span> Points \u223c50%<\/span><\/span> -44%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (224 – 22479, n=235, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>10184<\/span> Points \u223c46%<\/span><\/span> -49%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Wild Life Extreme Unlimited<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>44487<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +9%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (40668 – 44487, n=3)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>42587<\/span> Points \u223c96%<\/span><\/span> +5%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>40668<\/span> Points \u223c91%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>28879<\/span> Points \u223c65%<\/span><\/span> -29%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max<\/a>
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU, Apple M2 Max<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>25103<\/span> Points \u223c56%<\/span><\/span> -38%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>23085<\/span> Points \u223c52%<\/span><\/span> -43%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (882 – 44487, n=32, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>21220<\/span> Points \u223c48%<\/span><\/span> -48%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
SPECviewperf 13<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Solidworks (sw-04)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>159.12<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +14%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (140.1 – 159.1, n=2)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>149.6<\/span> fps \u223c94%<\/span><\/span> +7%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>140.08<\/span> fps \u223c88%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>134.49<\/span> fps \u223c85%<\/span><\/span> -4%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (79.5 – 179, n=20, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>118.9<\/span> fps \u223c75%<\/span><\/span> -15%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>108.6<\/span> fps \u223c68%<\/span><\/span> -22%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Siemens NX (snx-03)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>34.38<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +9%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (31.5 – 34.4, n=2)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>32.9<\/span> fps \u223c96%<\/span><\/span> +5%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>31.45<\/span> fps \u223c91%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (13.3 – 79.4, n=20, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>29.4<\/span> fps \u223c86%<\/span><\/span> -7%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>28.76<\/span> fps \u223c84%<\/span><\/span> -9%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>21.2<\/span> fps \u223c62%<\/span><\/span> -33%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Showcase (showcase-02)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>281.1<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +22%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (231 – 281, n=2)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>256<\/span> fps \u223c91%<\/span><\/span> +11%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>230.78<\/span> fps \u223c82%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>203.33<\/span> fps \u223c72%<\/span><\/span> -12%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>148.9<\/span> fps \u223c53%<\/span><\/span> -35%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (68.9 – 281, n=20, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>146.3<\/span> fps \u223c52%<\/span><\/span> -37%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Medical (medical-02)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>122.82<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +2%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (120.3 – 122.8, n=2)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>121.6<\/span> fps \u223c99%<\/span><\/span> +1%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>120.28<\/span> fps \u223c98%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>107.84<\/span> fps \u223c88%<\/span><\/span> -10%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>75.2<\/span> fps \u223c61%<\/span><\/span> -37%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (42.2 – 122.8, n=20, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>75.2<\/span> fps \u223c61%<\/span><\/span> -37%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Maya (maya-05)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>600.78<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +22%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (494 – 601, n=2)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>547<\/span> fps \u223c91%<\/span><\/span> +11%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>494.88<\/span> fps \u223c82%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>494.02<\/span> fps \u223c82%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (157 – 601, n=20, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>320<\/span> fps \u223c53%<\/span><\/span> -35%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>308.1<\/span> fps \u223c51%<\/span><\/span> -38%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Energy (energy-02)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>74.73<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +6%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (70.6 – 74.7, n=2)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>72.6<\/span> fps \u223c97%<\/span><\/span> +3%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>70.56<\/span> fps \u223c94%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>61.32<\/span> fps \u223c82%<\/span><\/span> -13%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (2.05 – 74.7, n=20, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>29.6<\/span> fps \u223c40%<\/span><\/span> -58%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>26.1<\/span> fps \u223c35%<\/span><\/span> -63%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Creo (creo-02)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>461.26<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +22%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (378 – 461, n=2)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>420<\/span> fps \u223c91%<\/span><\/span> +11%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>377.82<\/span> fps \u223c82%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>377.58<\/span> fps \u223c82%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (120 – 461, n=20, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>243<\/span> fps \u223c53%<\/span><\/span> -36%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>239.7<\/span> fps \u223c52%<\/span><\/span> -37%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Catia (catia-05)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>281.44<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +6%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (266 – 281, n=2)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>274<\/span> fps \u223c97%<\/span><\/span> +3%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>266.33<\/span> fps \u223c95%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>233.27<\/span> fps \u223c83%<\/span><\/span> -12%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (47.7 – 344, n=20, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>181.5<\/span> fps \u223c64%<\/span><\/span> -32%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>171.4<\/span> fps \u223c61%<\/span><\/span> -36%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

3ds Max (3dsmax-06)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>372.51<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +10%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (338 – 373, n=2)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>355<\/span> fps \u223c95%<\/span><\/span> +5%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>346.23<\/span> fps \u223c93%<\/span><\/span> +2%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>338.22<\/span> fps \u223c91%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (49.1 – 373, n=20, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>226<\/span> fps \u223c61%<\/span><\/span> -33%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>208.7<\/span> fps \u223c56%<\/span><\/span> -38%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
SPECviewperf 2020 v1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1920×1080 Solidworks (solidworks-05)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>499.25<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +17%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (426 – 499, n=2)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>463<\/span> fps \u223c93%<\/span><\/span> +9%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>426.16<\/span> fps \u223c85%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>420.83<\/span> fps \u223c84%<\/span><\/span> -1%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (29.9 – 499, n=7, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>290<\/span> fps \u223c58%<\/span><\/span> -32%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

1920×1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>34.28<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +10%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (31.3 – 34.3, n=2)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>32.8<\/span> fps \u223c96%<\/span><\/span> +5%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>31.26<\/span> fps \u223c91%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>30<\/span> fps \u223c88%<\/span><\/span> -4%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (2.93 – 34.3, n=16, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>21.6<\/span> fps \u223c63%<\/span><\/span> -31%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>21.1<\/span> fps \u223c62%<\/span><\/span> -33%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

1920×1080 Medical (medical-03)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>56.7<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +3%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (55.1 – 56.7, n=2)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>55.9<\/span> fps \u223c99%<\/span><\/span> +1%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>55.09<\/span> fps \u223c97%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>49.97<\/span> fps \u223c88%<\/span><\/span> -9%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>38.7<\/span> fps \u223c68%<\/span><\/span> -30%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (23.5 – 56.7, n=16, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>37.1<\/span> fps \u223c65%<\/span><\/span> -33%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

1920×1080 Maya (maya-06)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Average<\/span> NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>611<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>610.71<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>555.93<\/span> fps \u223c91%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (123.1 – 611, n=14, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>360<\/span> fps \u223c59%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>336<\/span> fps \u223c55%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

1920×1080 Energy (energy-03)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>74.95<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +6%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (70.7 – 75, n=2)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>72.8<\/span> fps \u223c97%<\/span><\/span> +3%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>70.65<\/span> fps \u223c94%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>62.41<\/span> fps \u223c83%<\/span><\/span> -12%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (20.6 – 75, n=16, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>34<\/span> fps \u223c45%<\/span><\/span> -52%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>26.2<\/span> fps \u223c35%<\/span><\/span> -63%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

1920×1080 Creo (creo-03)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>138.99<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +23%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>130.27<\/span> fps \u223c94%<\/span><\/span> +15%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (113.3 – 139, n=2)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>126.1<\/span> fps \u223c91%<\/span><\/span> +11%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>113.27<\/span> fps \u223c81%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (52 – 139, n=15, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>97<\/span> fps \u223c70%<\/span><\/span> -14%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>86.4<\/span> fps \u223c62%<\/span><\/span> -24%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

1920×1080 CATIA (catia-06)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>116.64<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +554%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>98.79<\/span> fps \u223c85%<\/span><\/span> +454%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (17.8 – 116.6, n=2)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>67.2<\/span> fps \u223c58%<\/span><\/span> +277%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>66.6<\/span> fps \u223c57%<\/span><\/span> +273%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (17.8 – 116.6, n=16, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>63.8<\/span> fps \u223c55%<\/span><\/span> +258%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>17.84<\/span> fps \u223c15%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

1920×1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>212.6<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +3%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (207 – 213, n=2)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>210<\/span> fps \u223c99%<\/span><\/span> +2%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>206.67<\/span> fps \u223c97%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>177.9<\/span> fps \u223c84%<\/span><\/span> -14%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>128.7<\/span> fps \u223c61%<\/span><\/span> -38%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (47.4 – 213, n=16, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>123.4<\/span> fps \u223c58%<\/span><\/span> -40%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
3DMark 11 Performance<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n46207\u00a0points<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3DMark Fire Strike Score<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n40149\u00a0points<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3DMark Time Spy Score<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n18602\u00a0points<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Help<\/abbr><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Blender \/ v3.3 Classroom OPTIX\/RTX<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (9 – 142, n=65, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>25.7<\/span> Seconds * \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> -98%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>22<\/span> Seconds * \u223c86%<\/span><\/span> -69%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>15<\/span> Seconds * \u223c58%<\/span><\/span> -15%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>15<\/span> Seconds * \u223c58%<\/span><\/span> -15%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>13<\/span> Seconds * \u223c51%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (9 – 15, n=11)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>11.6<\/span> Seconds * \u223c45%<\/span><\/span> +11%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>11<\/span> Seconds * \u223c43%<\/span><\/span> +15%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>11<\/span> Seconds * \u223c43%<\/span><\/span> +15%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Blender \/ v3.3 Classroom CUDA<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (17 – 168, n=68, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>43.4<\/span> Seconds * \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> -117%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>32<\/span> Seconds * \u223c74%<\/span><\/span> -60%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (17 – 119, n=12)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>26.4<\/span> Seconds * \u223c61%<\/span><\/span> -32%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>23<\/span> Seconds * \u223c53%<\/span><\/span> -15%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>22<\/span> Seconds * \u223c51%<\/span><\/span> -10%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>20<\/span> Seconds * \u223c46%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>18<\/span> Seconds * \u223c41%<\/span><\/span> +10%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>17<\/span> Seconds * \u223c39%<\/span><\/span> +15%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Blender \/ v3.3 Classroom CPU<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (147 – 698, n=77, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>329<\/span> Seconds * \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> -124%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max<\/a>
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU, Apple M2 Max<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>326<\/span> Seconds * \u223c99%<\/span><\/span> -122%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>263<\/span> Seconds * \u223c80%<\/span><\/span> -79%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>207<\/span> Seconds * \u223c63%<\/span><\/span> -41%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>200<\/span> Seconds * \u223c61%<\/span><\/span> -36%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>192<\/span> Seconds * \u223c58%<\/span><\/span> -31%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (147 – 286, n=11)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>189.5<\/span> Seconds * \u223c58%<\/span><\/span> -29%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>175<\/span> Seconds * \u223c53%<\/span><\/span> -19%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>147<\/span> Seconds * \u223c45%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n

* … smaller is better<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The gaming performance of the ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 is excellent, but a bit lower compared to the fastest devices due to the slightly slower version of the RTX 4090 Laptop. The AMD processor leaves a good impression during gaming and does not have to hide behind its Intel HX counterparts. We did not notice any issues during our gaming benchmarks, either. Considering the native WQHD resolution, however, we recommend you save the money for the\u00a0RTX 4090 Laptop<\/a>\u00a0SKU and get the\u00a0RTX 4080 Laptop<\/a>\u00a0instead.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Performance Rating – Percent<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>97<\/span> pt \u223c97%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>95.9<\/span> pt \u223c96%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>91.5<\/span> pt \u223c92%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>90.4<\/span> pt \u223c90%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>88.8<\/span> pt \u223c89%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS<\/a>
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>76.7<\/span> pt \u223c77%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>57<\/span> pt \u223c57%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>56.8<\/span> pt \u223c57%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
The Witcher 3 – 1920×1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>216.4<\/span> (5.6P0.1<\/sup>, 144.3P1<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +21%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>198.9<\/span> (190min<\/sup>, 191P1<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c92%<\/span><\/span> +11%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>178.6<\/span> (172min<\/sup>, 173P1<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c83%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>178<\/span> (151min<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c82%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>176.8<\/span> (159min<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c82%<\/span><\/span> -1%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS<\/a>
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>129.3<\/span> (110min<\/sup>, 111.14P1<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c60%<\/span><\/span> -28%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>111.1<\/span> (30min<\/sup>, 41.5P0.1<\/sup>, 74.7P1<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c51%<\/span><\/span> -38%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (8.61 – 217, n=229, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>99<\/span> fps \u223c46%<\/span><\/span> -45%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
GTA V – 1920×1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>145.5<\/span> (3.79min<\/sup>, 100P1<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +9%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>140.9<\/span> (3.54min<\/sup>, 83.3P1<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c97%<\/span><\/span> +5%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>140.7<\/span> (3.02min<\/sup>, 100P1<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c97%<\/span><\/span> +5%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>137.5<\/span> (3.4min<\/sup>, 100P1<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c95%<\/span><\/span> +3%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>134<\/span> (7.27min<\/sup>, 90.9P1<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c92%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS<\/a>
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>131.8<\/span> (6.21min<\/sup>, 90.9P1<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c91%<\/span><\/span> -2%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>101.5<\/span> (21.1min<\/sup>, 71.4P1<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c70%<\/span><\/span> -24%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (4.18 – 151.6, n=226, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>96.7<\/span> fps \u223c66%<\/span><\/span> -28%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark – 1920×1080 High Quality<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>187.4<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +10%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>180.7<\/span> (119min<\/sup>, 128.92P1<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c96%<\/span><\/span> +7%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>169.6<\/span> fps \u223c91%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>162.4<\/span> fps \u223c87%<\/span><\/span> -4%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>157.8<\/span> fps \u223c84%<\/span><\/span> -7%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS<\/a>
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>137.6<\/span> fps \u223c73%<\/span><\/span> -19%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>108<\/span> fps \u223c58%<\/span><\/span> -36%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (9.13 – 194.9, n=224, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>95.8<\/span> fps \u223c51%<\/span><\/span> -44%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Strange Brigade – 1920×1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n <\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>373<\/span> (29.9min<\/sup>, 272P1<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +12%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>350<\/span> (32.1min<\/sup>, 230P1<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c94%<\/span><\/span> +5%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>333<\/span> (38min<\/sup>, 227P1<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c89%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>323<\/span> (61.7min<\/sup>, 222P1<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c87%<\/span><\/span> -3%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>318<\/span> (29.2min<\/sup>, 228P1<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c85%<\/span><\/span> -5%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS<\/a>
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>219<\/span> (67.8min<\/sup>, 154.6P1<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c59%<\/span><\/span> -34%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>182.4<\/span> (66.8min<\/sup>, 132.6P1<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c49%<\/span><\/span> -45%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (10.9 – 421, n=226, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>173.3<\/span> fps \u223c46%<\/span><\/span> -48%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Dota 2 Reborn – 1920×1080 ultra (3\/3) best looking<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>194.7<\/span> (160min<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +8%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>185.9<\/span> (157.5min<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c95%<\/span><\/span> +3%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>179.7<\/span> (153.7min<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c92%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>179<\/span> (152.4min<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c92%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>177.3<\/span> (150.3min<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c91%<\/span><\/span> -1%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS<\/a>
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>170.5<\/span> (148.2min<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c88%<\/span><\/span> -5%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (22 – 194.7, n=245, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>129.3<\/span> fps \u223c66%<\/span><\/span> -28%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>111.3<\/span> (96.1min<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c57%<\/span><\/span> -38%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
X-Plane 11.11 – 1920×1080 high (fps_test=3)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>137<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +16%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>137<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +16%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>135.7<\/span> fps \u223c99%<\/span><\/span> +15%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>135.5<\/span> fps \u223c99%<\/span><\/span> +15%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>134.2<\/span> fps \u223c98%<\/span><\/span> +14%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>134.1<\/span> fps \u223c98%<\/span><\/span> +14%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>131.8<\/span> fps \u223c96%<\/span><\/span> +12%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS<\/a>
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>123.8<\/span> fps \u223c90%<\/span><\/span> +5%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>117.8<\/span> fps \u223c86%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (12.4 – 146.4, n=248, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>88.4<\/span> fps \u223c65%<\/span><\/span> -25%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>78.2<\/span> fps \u223c57%<\/span><\/span> -34%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
The Witcher 3 – 1920×1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>216.4<\/span> (5.6P0.1<\/sup>, 144.3P1<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +21%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (178 – 217, n=9)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>201<\/span> fps \u223c93%<\/span><\/span> +13%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>198.9<\/span> (190min<\/sup>, 191P1<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c92%<\/span><\/span> +11%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>178.6<\/span> (172min<\/sup>, 173P1<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c83%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>178<\/span> (151min<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c82%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>176.8<\/span> (159min<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c82%<\/span><\/span> -1%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS<\/a>
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>129.3<\/span> (110min<\/sup>, 111.14P1<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c60%<\/span><\/span> -28%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>111.1<\/span> (30min<\/sup>, 41.5P0.1<\/sup>, 74.7P1<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c51%<\/span><\/span> -38%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (8.61 – 217, n=229, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>99<\/span> fps \u223c46%<\/span><\/span> -45%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Cyberpunk 2077 1.5 – 1920×1080 Ultra Preset<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>135<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +3%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>130.6<\/span> (34.83min<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c97%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (104.5 – 159.7, n=6)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>128.7<\/span> fps \u223c95%<\/span><\/span> -1%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>122.8<\/span> (25.64min<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c91%<\/span><\/span> -6%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>106.2<\/span> (47.5min<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c79%<\/span><\/span> -19%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS<\/a>
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>99.4<\/span> (40.7min<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c74%<\/span><\/span> -24%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>99.1<\/span> (29min<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c73%<\/span><\/span> -24%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (23.8 – 159.7, n=65, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>79.3<\/span> fps \u223c59%<\/span><\/span> -39%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
The Witcher 3 v4.00 – 1920×1080 Ultra Preset \/ On AA:FX<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>150<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +12%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>141.8<\/span> fps \u223c95%<\/span><\/span> +6%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (133.9 – 150, n=4)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>140.8<\/span> fps \u223c94%<\/span><\/span> +5%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>133.9<\/span> fps \u223c89%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>125.3<\/span> (35.5min<\/sup>, 57.7P0.1<\/sup>, 92.5P1<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c84%<\/span><\/span> -6%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (66.3 – 150, n=9, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>113<\/span> fps \u223c75%<\/span><\/span> -16%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Shadow of the Tomb Raider – 1920×1080 Highest Preset AA:T<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>214<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +9%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>207<\/span> (140min<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c97%<\/span><\/span> +6%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>196<\/span> fps \u223c92%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (143.7 – 214, n=5)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>186.5<\/span> fps \u223c87%<\/span><\/span> -5%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>176<\/span> (117min<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c82%<\/span><\/span> -10%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (57 – 214, n=25, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>133.9<\/span> fps \u223c63%<\/span><\/span> -32%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
F1 22 – 1920×1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>138.2<\/span> (118min<\/sup>, 84P1<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +21%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Schenker XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>137.4<\/span> (118min<\/sup>, 92P1<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c99%<\/span><\/span> +20%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (114.3 – 140.6, n=7)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>131.7<\/span> fps \u223c95%<\/span><\/span> +15%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>114.3<\/span> (92min<\/sup>, 71P1<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c83%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>101<\/span> (90min<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c73%<\/span><\/span> -12%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

MSI Titan GT77 12UHS<\/a>
Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>79.8<\/span> (65min<\/sup>, 29P1<\/sup>)<\/span> fps \u223c58%<\/span><\/span> -30%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (28 – 140.6, n=35, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>77<\/span> fps \u223c56%<\/span><\/span> -33%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

\n0<\/text>10<\/text>20<\/text>30<\/text>40<\/text>50<\/text>60<\/text>70<\/text>80<\/text>90<\/text>100<\/text>110<\/text>120<\/text>130<\/text>140<\/text>150<\/text>160<\/text>170<\/text>180<\/text><\/g>Tooltip<\/text><\/svg><\/div>\n
\n
\"CPU\/GPU<\/a>
CPU\/GPU data Witcher 3 Ultra settings<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\"Two<\/a>
Two comparatively small fans<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

The Zephyrus Duo is usually audible in everyday situations and you should use the Quiet power profile when you do not need the full performance. The Turbo mode usually results in more than 30 dB(A) even while idling. Gaming and high load scenarios quickly result in more than 50 dB(A) and up to 56 dB(A), which will be annoying for longer periods. You can also notice the comparatively small fans of the cooling solution. There is no way around the noise when you need the maximum performance, but we recommend you check the other power profiles of the Armoury Crate software when you play games. We tested it with three different games:<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Title<\/th>\nQuiet<\/th>\nPerformance<\/th>\nTurbo<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Witcher 3<\/td>\n40.2 dB(A)<\/td>\n48.6 dB(A)<\/td>\n51.2 dB(A)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Witcher 3 v4.00<\/td>\n40.2 dB(A)<\/td>\n48.6 dB(A)<\/td>\n56 dB(A)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cyberpunkt 2077 v1.5<\/td>\n40.2 dB(A)<\/td>\n48.6 dB(A)<\/td>\n56 dB(A)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Modern titles will usually run well with the Performance mode, where the fps number is just a bit lower compared to the Turbo mode, but the fan noise is much more convenient at ~49 dB(A). The Quiet mode is mostly suitable for older titles, because the performance will drop noticeable. We also noticed some electronic sounds in some benchmarks\/games.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Noise Level<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Idle<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n\n

23.9 \/ 32.9 \/ 36.5 dB(A)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Load<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n 42.9 \/ 56 dB(A)<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n\n\"red<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n\n

30 dB
silent<\/span><\/p>\n

40 dB(A)
audible<\/span><\/p>\n

50 dB(A)
loud<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

min: \"dark\", med: \"mid\", max: \"light\"\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)<\/span>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0environment noise: 23.9 dB(A)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

\n\ndB(A)<\/text>\n<\/g>0<\/text>10<\/text>20<\/text>30<\/text>40<\/text>50<\/text>60<\/text>70<\/text>80<\/text>90<\/text>Deep Bass<\/text>Middle Bass<\/text>High Bass<\/text>Lower Range<\/text>Mids<\/text>Higher Mids<\/text>Lower Highs<\/text>Mid Highs<\/text>Upper Highs<\/text>Super Highs<\/text>20<\/text>29.4<\/text>37<\/text>30.8<\/text>29<\/text>29.7<\/text>33.1<\/text>31.3<\/text>25<\/text>33<\/text>35.7<\/text>30.7<\/text>28.7<\/text>26.8<\/text>39.4<\/text>33.6<\/text>31<\/text>28.2<\/text>37.4<\/text>27.6<\/text>28<\/text>27.9<\/text>28.8<\/text>25.5<\/text>40<\/text>31.5<\/text>33.4<\/text>30.8<\/text>31.2<\/text>30.1<\/text>31<\/text>30.7<\/text>50<\/text>24.7<\/text>29.7<\/text>29.1<\/text>27.3<\/text>24.4<\/text>25.8<\/text>25.7<\/text>63<\/text>24.4<\/text>27.5<\/text>30.3<\/text>22.4<\/text>22.4<\/text>24.6<\/text>23.4<\/text>80<\/text>23.2<\/text>33.7<\/text>30.3<\/text>21.7<\/text>20.1<\/text>23<\/text>23.7<\/text>100<\/text>24<\/text>26.5<\/text>25.3<\/text>24.1<\/text>20.5<\/text>20.6<\/text>21.7<\/text>125<\/text>26.1<\/text>28<\/text>27.3<\/text>25.2<\/text>21<\/text>17.7<\/text>23.2<\/text>160<\/text>25.2<\/text>26.8<\/text>26.4<\/text>21.1<\/text>21.2<\/text>18.8<\/text>24.4<\/text>200<\/text>28<\/text>30<\/text>25.9<\/text>23<\/text>24.3<\/text>19.6<\/text>25.1<\/text>250<\/text>28.9<\/text>33.3<\/text>25.3<\/text>21.7<\/text>22.6<\/text>16.4<\/text>24.9<\/text>315<\/text>29.6<\/text>32.7<\/text>28.7<\/text>20.2<\/text>21.8<\/text>15.6<\/text>27.4<\/text>400<\/text>34.1<\/text>35.5<\/text>27.7<\/text>20.5<\/text>23.2<\/text>12.3<\/text>26.8<\/text>500<\/text>33<\/text>41.2<\/text>28.2<\/text>24.6<\/text>26<\/text>12.6<\/text>27.6<\/text>630<\/text>34.4<\/text>40.3<\/text>30.6<\/text>24.4<\/text>27.1<\/text>12.4<\/text>29.3<\/text>800<\/text>37.7<\/text>43<\/text>32.9<\/text>24.8<\/text>28.4<\/text>10.9<\/text>30.9<\/text>1000<\/text>39.9<\/text>45.5<\/text>35.2<\/text>25.1<\/text>29.1<\/text>10.2<\/text>32.6<\/text>1250<\/text>40.2<\/text>45.7<\/text>34<\/text>23.7<\/text>26.8<\/text>10.3<\/text>31.5<\/text>1600<\/text>37.9<\/text>45<\/text>32.3<\/text>21.7<\/text>26<\/text>10.4<\/text>29.3<\/text>2000<\/text>37.3<\/text>44<\/text>31.2<\/text>20.4<\/text>24.5<\/text>10.7<\/text>28.5<\/text>2500<\/text>37.1<\/text>43.7<\/text>30.8<\/text>18.2<\/text>23.1<\/text>11<\/text>26.7<\/text>3150<\/text>35.4<\/text>43.1<\/text>28.5<\/text>17.5<\/text>21.5<\/text>11.6<\/text>25<\/text>4000<\/text>37.7<\/text>46.2<\/text>31.6<\/text>17.3<\/text>23.7<\/text>11.8<\/text>28.5<\/text>5000<\/text>38.5<\/text>45.8<\/text>30.7<\/text>15.9<\/text>20<\/text>11.8<\/text>25.3<\/text>6300<\/text>33.3<\/text>44.1<\/text>24<\/text>14.1<\/text>16.5<\/text>12<\/text>20.1<\/text>8000<\/text>28.8<\/text>41.8<\/text>20.4<\/text>13.1<\/text>14<\/text>12.1<\/text>17.8<\/text>10000<\/text>24.6<\/text>35.6<\/text>17.4<\/text>13.2<\/text>13.1<\/text>12.3<\/text>16<\/text>12500<\/text>21.2<\/text>32.2<\/text>17.4<\/text>13.3<\/text>12.9<\/text>12.4<\/text>17.5<\/text>16000<\/text>17.9<\/text>27.7<\/text>18.4<\/text>13.6<\/text>12.9<\/text>12.3<\/text>19.1<\/text>SPL<\/text>48.9<\/text>56<\/text>42.9<\/text>32.9<\/text>36.5<\/text>23.9<\/text>40.1<\/text>N<\/text>6.5<\/text>10.6<\/text>4.1<\/text>1.7<\/text>2.4<\/text>0.5<\/text>3.3<\/text>median 33.3<\/text>median 41.2<\/text>median 28.2<\/text>median 20.5<\/text>median 22.6<\/text>median 12.3<\/text>median 25.3<\/text>Delta<\/text>5.7<\/text>6<\/text>3.7<\/text>4.1<\/text>2.5<\/text>2<\/text>3.5<\/text>hearing range<\/text>hide median<\/text> Fan Noise<\/text> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_897663_0’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” \/> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_897663_0’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.pn_897663_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_897663_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.pn_897663_2’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_897663_2’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.pn_897663_3’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_897663_3’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.pn_897663_4’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_897663_4’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.pn_897663_5’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_897663_5’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.pn_897663_6’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_897663_6’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});”>Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/text> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_897663_0’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” \/> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_897663_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” \/> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_897663_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” \/> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_897663_2’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” \/> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_897663_2’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” \/> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_897663_3’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” \/> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_897663_3’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” \/> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_897663_4’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” \/> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_897663_4’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” \/> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_897663_5’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” \/> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_897663_5’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” \/> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_897663_6’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” \/> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_897663_6’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” \/><\/svg><\/div>\n
\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
<\/th>\nAsus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N<\/span><\/th>\n		MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB<\/span><\/th>\n		Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR<\/span><\/th>\n		Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024<\/span><\/th>\n		Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)<\/span><\/th>\n		Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max<\/a>
M2 Max 38-Core GPU, M2 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z<\/span><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
Noise<\/td>\n<\/td>\n\n

-4%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-1%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

13%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

19%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

off \/ environment *<\/td>\n\n

23.9<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

24.6 <\/p>\n

-3%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

24 <\/p>\n

-0%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

23 <\/p>\n

4%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

26 <\/p>\n

-9%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

23.9 <\/p>\n

-0%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Idle Minimum *<\/td>\n\n

23.9<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

29.2 <\/p>\n

-22%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

26 <\/p>\n

-9%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

23 <\/p>\n

4%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

26 <\/p>\n

-9%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

23.9 <\/p>\n

-0%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Idle Average *<\/td>\n\n

32.9<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

29.2 <\/p>\n

11%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

28 <\/p>\n

15%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

23 <\/p>\n

30%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

27 <\/p>\n

18%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

23.9 <\/p>\n

27%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Idle Maximum *<\/td>\n\n

36.5<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

29.2 <\/p>\n

20%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

34 <\/p>\n

7%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

23.6 <\/p>\n

35%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

29 <\/p>\n

21%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

23.9 <\/p>\n

35%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Load Average *<\/td>\n\n

42.9<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

50.7 <\/p>\n

-18%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

47 <\/p>\n

-10%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

39 <\/p>\n

9%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

41 <\/p>\n

4%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

36.6 <\/p>\n

15%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Witcher 3 ultra *<\/td>\n\n

51.2<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

53.3 <\/p>\n

-4%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

55 <\/p>\n

-7%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

51.6 <\/p>\n

-1%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

48 <\/p>\n

6%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

35.1 <\/p>\n

31%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Load Maximum *<\/td>\n\n

56<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

61 <\/p>\n

-9%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

56 <\/p>\n

-0%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

51.3 <\/p>\n

8%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

50 <\/p>\n

11%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

43.2 <\/p>\n

23%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

* … smaller is better<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

The chassis temperatures are very comfortable during light workloads. The position of the keyboard is beneficial for gaming\/under load, because it only warms up in the upper region and the frequently used keys usually stay very cool. However, the area between the keyboard and the secondary is a hot spot. We measure up to 47 \u00b0C at the bottom, so you should not put the device on your lap under load. The overall temperature development is okay. <\/p>\n

Our stress test favors the dedicated graphics card, The processor will level off at 50 Watts after a few minutes, while the GPU consumption rises from 130 to ~140 Watts (which is the specified value for the Turbo power profile) and stays on this level. This is a decent result and we did no see a performance drop immediately after the stress test. Combined CPU\/GPU workloads on battery power result in a CPU consumption of ~43 Watts and ~33 Watts for the GPU.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\"CPU\/GPU<\/a>
CPU\/GPU data stress test<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n29.7 \u00b0C
85 F<\/td>\n		31 \u00b0C
88 F<\/td>\n		29.9 \u00b0C
86 F<\/td>\n		\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n42.5 \u00b0C
109 F<\/td>\n		44.2 \u00b0C
112 F<\/td>\n		42.2 \u00b0C
108 F<\/td>\n		\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n35.6 \u00b0C
96 F<\/td>\n		34.7 \u00b0C
94 F<\/td>\n		34.8 \u00b0C
95 F<\/td>\n		\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Maximum: 44.2 \u00b0C = 112 F
Average: 36.1 \u00b0C = 97 F<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n46.8 \u00b0C
116 F<\/td>\n		46.7 \u00b0C
116 F<\/td>\n		44.9 \u00b0C
113 F<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n41.7 \u00b0C
107 F<\/td>\n		41.6 \u00b0C
107 F<\/td>\n		40.9 \u00b0C
106 F<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n38.5 \u00b0C
101 F<\/td>\n		38.6 \u00b0C
101 F<\/td>\n		35.8 \u00b0C
96 F<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Maximum: 46.8 \u00b0C = 116 F
Average: 41.7 \u00b0C = 107 F<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n

Power Supply (max.)\u00a0 50.8 \u00b0C = 123 F | Room Temperature\u00a020.5 \u00b0C = 69 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

(\u00b1)<\/span> The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.1 \u00b0C \/ 97 F, compared to the average of 33.8 \u00b0C \/ 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(\u00b1)<\/span> The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.2 \u00b0C \/ 112 F, compared to the average of 40.4 \u00b0C \/ 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 \u00b0C for the class Gaming.
(-)<\/span> The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.8 \u00b0C \/ 116 F, compared to the average of 43.2 \u00b0C \/ 110 F
(+)<\/span> In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 \u00b0C \/ 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 \u00b0C \/ 93 F.
(\u00b1)<\/span> Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.5 \u00b0C \/ 98 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 \u00b0C \/ 93 F.
(+)<\/span> The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.7 \u00b0C \/ 96.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-)<\/span> The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29 \u00b0C \/ 84.2 F (-6.7 \u00b0C \/ -12.1 F). <\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Asus uses a speaker system consisting of 6 modules and the result is very good overall. The manufacturer also improved the sound performance compared to the previous model, only the bass performance could be better. The result is definitely sufficient for occasional video\/movie playback, but the speakers are usually rivaled by the fan noise while gaming.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n\ndB(A)<\/text>\n<\/g>0<\/text>10<\/text>20<\/text>30<\/text>40<\/text>50<\/text>60<\/text>70<\/text>80<\/text>90<\/text>Deep Bass<\/text>Middle Bass<\/text>High Bass<\/text>Lower Range<\/text>Mids<\/text>Higher Mids<\/text>Lower Highs<\/text>Mid Highs<\/text>Upper Highs<\/text>Super Highs<\/text>20<\/text>33.1<\/text>32<\/text>25<\/text>39.4<\/text>35.4<\/text>31<\/text>28.8<\/text>30.6<\/text>40<\/text>31<\/text>30.5<\/text>50<\/text>25.8<\/text>28.6<\/text>63<\/text>24.6<\/text>32.3<\/text>80<\/text>23<\/text>35.5<\/text>100<\/text>20.6<\/text>45.8<\/text>125<\/text>17.7<\/text>51.6<\/text>160<\/text>18.8<\/text>55.2<\/text>200<\/text>19.6<\/text>63.3<\/text>250<\/text>16.4<\/text>66.1<\/text>315<\/text>15.6<\/text>70.5<\/text>400<\/text>12.3<\/text>72.8<\/text>500<\/text>12.6<\/text>72.3<\/text>630<\/text>12.4<\/text>76.3<\/text>800<\/text>10.9<\/text>75.9<\/text>1000<\/text>10.2<\/text>71.2<\/text>1250<\/text>10.3<\/text>71.4<\/text>1600<\/text>10.4<\/text>70.9<\/text>2000<\/text>10.7<\/text>69<\/text>2500<\/text>11<\/text>69.2<\/text>3150<\/text>11.6<\/text>70<\/text>4000<\/text>11.8<\/text>67.1<\/text>5000<\/text>11.8<\/text>65.7<\/text>6300<\/text>12<\/text>63.7<\/text>8000<\/text>12.1<\/text>63.2<\/text>10000<\/text>12.3<\/text>62.1<\/text>12500<\/text>12.4<\/text>60<\/text>16000<\/text>12.3<\/text>54<\/text>SPL<\/text>23.9<\/text>82.5<\/text>N<\/text>0.5<\/text>57.2<\/text>median 12.3<\/text>median 67.1<\/text>Delta<\/text>2<\/text>4.9<\/text>28.7<\/text>28.4<\/text>27.5<\/text>29.2<\/text>24<\/text>25<\/text>28.3<\/text>36<\/text>25.9<\/text>35.5<\/text>21.7<\/text>50.2<\/text>18.5<\/text>54.1<\/text>23.6<\/text>64.1<\/text>17<\/text>66.8<\/text>15.8<\/text>68.7<\/text>19.1<\/text>72.8<\/text>16.6<\/text>73.7<\/text>16.6<\/text>75.2<\/text>10.5<\/text>73.7<\/text>12.5<\/text>73.5<\/text>11.7<\/text>73.2<\/text>9.6<\/text>74.9<\/text>10.2<\/text>74.3<\/text>10.1<\/text>75.7<\/text>10.4<\/text>75.3<\/text>10.5<\/text>76.4<\/text>11.1<\/text>76.2<\/text>11.5<\/text>74.2<\/text>11.9<\/text>72.2<\/text>12.3<\/text>70.9<\/text>12.4<\/text>70.4<\/text>12.5<\/text>70.5<\/text>12.6<\/text>69.3<\/text>12.5<\/text>68.2<\/text>11.8<\/text>67.4<\/text>23.9<\/text>86.1<\/text>0.5<\/text>73.8<\/text>median 12.3<\/text>median 73.2<\/text>2.5<\/text>2.7<\/text>hearing range<\/text>hide median<\/text> Pink Noise<\/text> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_897662_0’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” \/> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_897662_0’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.pn_897662_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_897662_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});”>Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/text> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_897662_0’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” \/> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_897662_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” \/> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_897662_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” \/> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_882698_0’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” \/> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_882698_0’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.pn_882698_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_882698_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});”>Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max<\/text> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_882698_0’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” \/> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_882698_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” \/> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_882698_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” \/><\/svg><\/p>\n

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)<\/p>\n

\n
\n
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W audio analysis<\/h5>\n

(+)<\/span> | speakers can play relatively loud (82.5 dB)
Bass 100 – 315 Hz<\/i>
(\u00b1)<\/span> | reduced bass – on average 9.5% lower than median
(\u00b1)<\/span> | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 – 2000 Hz<\/i>
(\u00b1)<\/span> | higher mids – on average 5.4% higher than median
(+)<\/span> | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 – 16 kHz<\/i>
(+)<\/span> | balanced highs – only 2.7% away from median
(+)<\/span> | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 – 16.000 Hz<\/i>
(+)<\/span> | overall sound is linear (11% difference to median)
Compared to same class<\/i>
\u00bb <\/b>11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
\u00bb <\/b>The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested<\/i>
\u00bb <\/b>6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
\u00bb <\/b>The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max audio analysis<\/h5>\n

(+)<\/span> | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 – 315 Hz<\/i>
(+)<\/span> | good bass – only 3.8% away from median
(+)<\/span> | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 – 2000 Hz<\/i>
(+)<\/span> | balanced mids – only 1.4% away from median
(+)<\/span> | mids are linear (1.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 – 16 kHz<\/i>
(+)<\/span> | balanced highs – only 2.4% away from median
(+)<\/span> | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 – 16.000 Hz<\/i>
(+)<\/span> | overall sound is linear (4.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class<\/i>
\u00bb <\/b>1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
\u00bb <\/b>The best had a delta of 3%, average was 17%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested<\/i>
\u00bb <\/b>0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
\u00bb <\/b>The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\"Bulky<\/a>
Bulky 330W PSU<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
\n

The ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 is not a particularly efficient device with a minimal power consumption of 19 Watts and more than 30 Watts at the maximum brightness (secondary screen turned off). The secondary screen will increase the power consumption by 4-7 Watts depending on the brightness. We measure around 260 Watts while gaming and up to 330 Watts during our stress test, but the value quickly levels off at ~270 Watts. This means the 330W PSU is completely sufficient.\n<\/p>\n

We once again want to mention that the dedicated GeForce GPU is handling all the graphics tasks when you use an external screen, which means the following CPU measurements with an external screen do not deliver comparable results.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
<\/th>\nAsus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N, MiniLED, 2560×1600, 16.00<\/span><\/th>\n		MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, Mini-LED, 3840×2160, 17.30<\/span><\/th>\n		Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560×1600, 16.00<\/span><\/th>\n		Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 2560×1600, 16.00<\/span><\/th>\n		Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0), IPS-Level, 3840×2400, 16.00<\/span><\/th>\n		Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max<\/a>
M2 Max, M2 Max 38-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048Z, Mini-LED, 3456×2234, 16.20<\/span><\/th>\n		Average<\/span> NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/th>\n		Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
Power Consumption<\/td>\n<\/td>\n\n

8%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

14%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

49%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

8%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

22%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Idle Minimum *<\/td>\n\n

19.2<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

14 <\/p>\n

27%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

18 <\/p>\n

6%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

15.2 <\/p>\n

21%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

19 <\/p>\n

1%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

5.2 <\/p>\n

73%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n
Idle Average *<\/td>\n\n

29.7<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

21.6 <\/p>\n

27%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

24 <\/p>\n

19%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

22.8 <\/p>\n

23%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

24 <\/p>\n

19%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

16.5 <\/p>\n

44%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n
Idle Maximum *<\/td>\n\n

30.8<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

24.8 <\/p>\n

19%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

32 <\/p>\n

-4%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

49.8 <\/p>\n

-62%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

31 <\/p>\n

-1%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

16.8 <\/p>\n

45%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n
Load Average *<\/td>\n\n

126<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

122.5 <\/p>\n

3%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

130 <\/p>\n

-3%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

121.2 <\/p>\n

4%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

104 <\/p>\n

17%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

113 <\/p>\n

10%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n
Witcher 3 ultra *<\/td>\n\n

258<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

265 <\/p>\n

-3%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

260 <\/p>\n

-1%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

242 <\/p>\n

6%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

186.5 <\/p>\n

28%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

92 <\/p>\n

64%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Load Maximum *<\/td>\n\n

330<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

418 <\/p>\n

-27%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

320 <\/p>\n

3%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

273.7 <\/p>\n

17%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

256 <\/p>\n

22%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

145 <\/p>\n

56%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n
\n

236 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?<\/a>(103.1 – 418, n=174, last 2 years)<\/span><\/p>\n

28%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

* … smaller is better<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n0<\/text>20<\/text>40<\/text>60<\/text>80<\/text>100<\/text>120<\/text>140<\/text>160<\/text>180<\/text>200<\/text>220<\/text>240<\/text>260<\/text>280<\/text>300<\/text>320<\/text><\/g>Tooltip<\/text><\/svg><\/div>\n
\n0<\/text>15<\/text>30<\/text>45<\/text>60<\/text>75<\/text>90<\/text>105<\/text>120<\/text>135<\/text>150<\/text>165<\/text>180<\/text>195<\/text>210<\/text>225<\/text>240<\/text><\/g>Tooltip<\/text><\/svg><\/div>\n
\n

The battery runtime is considerably worse compared to the previous model, despite the same 90 Wh battery. Right now, we are not sure whether this is only caused by the new Mini-LED panel or issues with the new AMD platform. Even at 150 nits and without the secondary screen, we only managed about 4 hours video playback and Wi-Fi runtime, which dropped to just 2.5 hours at the maximum panel brightness. These are poor results and the load runtime is less than one hour. A full recharge of battery takes 108 minutes when the laptop is turned on.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Battery Runtime<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 110)<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n3h\u00a058min<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 110)<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n2h\u00a036min<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n3h\u00a050min<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Load (maximum brightness)<\/td>\n\n<\/td>\n0h\u00a057min<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
<\/th>\nAsus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/a>
R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90\u00a0Wh<\/span><\/th>\n		MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI<\/a>
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9\u00a0Wh<\/span><\/th>\n		Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H<\/a>
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 99.9\u00a0Wh<\/span><\/th>\n		Razer Blade 16 Early 2023<\/a>
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 95.2\u00a0Wh<\/span><\/th>\n		Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX<\/a>
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 90\u00a0Wh<\/span><\/th>\n		Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max<\/a>
M2 Max, M2 Max 38-Core GPU, 99.6\u00a0Wh<\/span><\/th>\n		Average of class<\/span> Gaming<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
Battery Runtime<\/td>\n<\/td>\n\n

47%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

73%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

48%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

83%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

226%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

55%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

H.264<\/td>\n\n

230<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

358 <\/p>\n

56%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

<\/td>\n<\/td>\n\n
\n

559 <\/p>\n

143%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

1124 <\/p>\n

389%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
WiFi v1.3<\/td>\n\n

238<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

319 <\/p>\n

34%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

303 <\/p>\n

27%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

365 <\/p>\n

53%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

469 <\/p>\n

97%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

887 <\/p>\n

273%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
Load<\/td>\n\n

57<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

86 <\/p>\n

51%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

124 <\/p>\n

118%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

81 <\/p>\n

42%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

62 <\/p>\n

9%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

66 <\/p>\n

16%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

88.7 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?<\/a>(36 – 228, n=151, last 2 years)<\/span><\/p>\n

56%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Pros<\/h3>\n

+<\/span> sturdy metal chassis
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

+<\/span> fastest CPU\/GPU combination
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

+<\/span> great system performance
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

+<\/span> excellent 240 Hz Mini-LED screen
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

+<\/span> numerous features like FreeSync, G-Sync & Wi-Fi 6E
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

+<\/span> 2x SO-DIMM & 2x M.2-2280 SSD
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

+<\/span> fast card reader<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Cons<\/h3>\n

–<\/span> no USB 4.0
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

–<\/span> loud fans during gaming
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

–<\/span> high idle consumption and short battery runtime
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

–<\/span> some software bugs
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

–<\/span> handling of the second screen not always ideal
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

–<\/span> external screen is always handled by dGPU<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\"In<\/a>
In review: Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023. Test model courtesy of Asus Germany.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
\n

The new ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 is once again an interesting concept with its secondary screen, but it also requires compromises. The laptop is significantly thicker than the competition and even though the quality of the secondary screen is very good, it just cannot match the excellent image quality of the new 240 Hz Mini-LED screen. The dual-screen handling is also not always ideal in practice, but this is a general issue of Windows. The secondary screen is attached via iGPU, which means the Nvidia GPU takes care of all graphics calculations when you use an external screen (4K for example), which will increase the power consumption. The position of the keyboard at the front of the laptop is another issue, which can be solved with the included palm rest on your desk at home, but it is still an issue on the road. Does the secondary screen make much sense? Well, that depends on your usage scenario. <\/p>\n

Asus improved the laptop in key areas, starting with the new matte 240 Hz Mini-LED screen and the WQHD resolution. The picture quality is amazing and it is already very bright for SDR contents at 700 nits (almost 1400 nits for HDR contents). The colors are already very accurate out of the box and we had no problems to calibrate the screen. <\/p>\n

The new\u00a0GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop<\/a>\u00a0is the most powerful GPU for notebooks right now and the performance advantage over the old RTX 3080 Ti is huge. However, it is only the fastest version (175W) in manual mode, but we recommend the\u00a0RTX 4080 Laptop<\/a>\u00a0SKU nonetheless considering the native WQHD resolution.\u00a0 <\/p>\n

\n

The new Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 convinces with the excellent Mini-LED screen as well as the powerful hardware combination consisting of the new AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX and the GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop, which has no problems with the native WQHD resolution. There are still some bugs though and the fans are very noisy when you utilize the full performance potential. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

AMD\u2019s new Zen4 processor, the Ryzen 9 7945HX<\/a>, is probably the most interesting upgrade right now. Thanks to 16 Zen4 cores, it steals the multi-core performance crown from the Intel Core i9-13980HX and even consumes less power. Due to the previously mentioned issues with the dedicated Nvidia GPU when external screens are attached, we cannot offer accurate efficiency numbers at this point, but we will cover that in a separate article.\u00a0 <\/p>\n

There are also some issues we need to talk about, and our test unit had some bugs. The idle power consumption is also very high, which obviously affects the battery runtime as well. Whether this is a software issue from Asus or an initial problem of the new AMD platform is not clear at this point. The high price is another problem, but this is the case for all RTX 4090 notebooks right now. Considering the price, we also have to criticize the lack of USB 4 as well as the use of DDR5-4800 RAM. <\/p>\n

All in all, the new ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 is good device with plenty of power and the secondary screen can be a real advantage for some users. If you do not need the second display (gamer or content creator) on your notebook, however, you are better off with a regular laptop, which also means less compromise in some areas.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 can only be pre-ordered right now and should be available in the next couple of weeks.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\nAsus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W<\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n–
\n03\/14\/2023 v7<\/span>
\n<\/span>
\nAndreas Osthoff<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Connectivity<\/p>\n

63\u00a0\/\u00a080<\/span>\u00a0\u2192\u00a079%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Application Performance<\/p>\n

96%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Gaming<\/span> – Weighted Average<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

More Articles for this Device<\/h3>\n

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W (Zephyrus Duo 16 Series)<\/p>\n

Related Articles<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Transparency<\/h4>\n

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Pricecompare<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n
\"Andreas<\/picture><\/a><\/div>\n

Editor of the original article<\/a>:<\/i> Andreas Osthoff<\/a> – Managing Editor Business Laptops – 1471 articles published on Notebookcheck<\/span> since 2013<\/p>\n

I grew up with modern consumer electronics and my first computer was a Commodore C64, which encouraged my interest in building my own systems. I started working as a review editor for Notebookcheck during my dual studies at Siemens. Currently, I am mainly responsible for dealing with business laptops and mobile workstations. It\u2019s a great experience to be able to review the latest devices and technologies and then compare them with each other.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Andreas Osthoff,\u00a02023-03-15\u00a0(Update:\u00a02023-03-15)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Read More<\/a>
\n Andreas Osthoff<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Debut for the AMD Zen4 Ryzen 9 7945HX. Asus refreshes its ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 and uses the best components you can currently get. The new GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop is supported by AMD\u2019s Ryzen 9 7945HX, the fastest mobile CPU right now. The manufacturer also replaces the 4K screen with a new WQHD Mini-LED<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":618556,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1148,46,25642],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-618555","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-notebook","8":"category-technology","9":"category-zephyrus"},"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/618555","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=618555"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/618555\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/618556"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=618555"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=618555"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=618555"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}