{"id":612432,"date":"2023-02-27T08:49:39","date_gmt":"2023-02-27T14:49:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/news.sellorbuyhomefast.com\/index.php\/2023\/02\/27\/vivo-x90-pro-smartphone-review-can-mediateks-high-end-soc-keep-up-with-the-snapdragon-8-gen-2-notebookcheck-net-reviews\/"},"modified":"2023-02-27T08:49:39","modified_gmt":"2023-02-27T14:49:39","slug":"vivo-x90-pro-smartphone-review-can-mediateks-high-end-soc-keep-up-with-the-snapdragon-8-gen-2-notebookcheck-net-reviews","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/2023\/02\/27\/vivo-x90-pro-smartphone-review-can-mediateks-high-end-soc-keep-up-with-the-snapdragon-8-gen-2-notebookcheck-net-reviews\/","title":{"rendered":"Vivo X90 Pro smartphone review – Can MediaTek’s high-end SoC keep up with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2? – NotebookCheck.net Reviews"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

A questionable upgrade to the X80 Pro.<\/b> While the Pro+ model of the Vivo X90 series relies on a Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, the X90 Pro uses the new MediaTek Dimensity 9200. Our review will tell how well the chipset performs in everyday use and what shortcomings Vivo X90 Pro has. <\/p>\n

Marcus Herbrich, ????<\/span> Daniel Schmidt<\/span>, \u2713<\/span> Anton Avdyushkin<\/span> (translated by<\/a> DeepL \/ Ninh Duy), Published ????????<\/a> ????????<\/a> …<\/a>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\"Test<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
\n

After we already reviewed the actual flagship of the X90 series, the Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>,\u00a0which is only available in China or as an import, we will take a closer look at the European top model. The Vivo X90 Pro also relies on a camera system with Zeiss branding and Sony’s large IMX989 image sensor in a 1-inch format.<\/p>\n

The Vivo X90 Pro’s features are also impressive. The 6.78-inch, 120 Hz Samsung E6 AMOLED panel has a peak brightness of 1,300 nits, and the fast MediaTek Dimensity 9200 chipset, which is supported by 12 GB of RAM and 256 GB of storage.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Graphics adapter<\/p>\n

ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Display<\/p>\n

6.78 inch 20:9, 2800 x 1260 pixel 453 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy:\u00a0yes, HDR, 120\u00a0Hz<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Storage<\/p>\n

\n

256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256\u00a0GB\u00a0 <\/p>\n

, 221\u00a0GB free<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Connections<\/p>\n

1 USB 3.0 \/ 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum, OTG, Miracast, IR Blaster<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Networking<\/p>\n

Wi-Fi 6E (a\/b\/g\/n = Wi-Fi\u00a04\/ac = Wi-Fi\u00a05\/ax = Wi-Fi\u00a06\/ Wi-Fi\u00a06E 6\u00a0GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, 5G: N1\/N3\/N5\/N8\/N28A\/N38\/N40\/N41\/N77 \/N78\/N79; 4G: B1\/B2\/B3\/B4\/B5\/B7\/B8\/B12\/B17\/B18\/B19\/B20\/B26\/B28A\/B34\/B38\/B39\/B40\/B41; 3G: 850\/1900\/2100MHz; 2G: 850\/900\/1800\/1900MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Size<\/p>\n

height x width x depth (in mm): 9.3 x 164.1 x 74.5 ( = 0.37 x 6.46 x 2.93 in)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Battery<\/p>\n

4870\u00a0mAh Lithium-Polymer<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Charging<\/p>\n

wireless charging, fast charging \/ Quickcharge<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Operating System<\/p>\n

Android 13<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Camera<\/p>\n

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f\/1.8, 23mm, 1.6\u00b5m) + 50MP (2x optical zoom, f\/1.6, 50mm, 1\/2.4″, 0.7\u00b5m) + 12MP (f\/2.0), camera2API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f\/2.5, 24mm, 1\/2.8″, 0.8\u00b5m)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Additional features<\/p>\n

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, charger, case, USB cable, info material, Funtouch OS 13, 12 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, NSS: GPS L1+L5, BeiDou, Glonass L1, Galileo E1+E5, SBAS, fanless, waterproof<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Weight<\/p>\n

214.9\u00a0g ( =\u00a07.58\u00a0oz \/ 0.47\u00a0pounds), Power Supply: 243\u00a0g ( =\u00a08.57\u00a0oz \/ 0.54\u00a0pounds)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Rating<\/p>\n<\/th>\n

\n

Date<\/p>\n<\/th>\n

\n

Model<\/p>\n<\/th>\n

\n

Weight<\/p>\n<\/th>\n

\n

Drive<\/p>\n<\/th>\n

\n

Size<\/p>\n<\/th>\n

\n

Resolution<\/p>\n<\/th>\n

\n

Best Price<\/p>\n<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n

89.1\u00a0%<\/span><\/td>\n\n

02\/2023<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>
Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11<\/td>\n		214.9\u00a0g<\/td>\n256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/td>\n6.78″<\/td>\n2800×1260<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
89.1\u00a0%<\/span><\/td>\n\n

02\/2023<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Xiaomi 13<\/a>
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740<\/td>\n		189\u00a0g<\/td>\n256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/td>\n6.36″<\/td>\n2400×1080<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
89.1\u00a0%<\/span><\/td>\n\n

11\/2022<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a>
Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7<\/td>\n		212\u00a0g<\/td>\n128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/td>\n6.70″<\/td>\n3120×1440<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
87\u00a0%<\/span><\/td>\n\n

08\/2022<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

OnePlus 10T<\/a>
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730<\/td>\n		203.5\u00a0g<\/td>\n256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/td>\n6.70″<\/td>\n2412×1080<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
90\u00a0%<\/span><\/td>\n\n

02\/2023<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740<\/td>\n		221\u00a0g<\/td>\n256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/td>\n6.78″<\/td>\n3200×1440<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\"Vivo<\/a>
Vivo X90 Pro only available in black <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
\n

The Vivo X90 Pro offers, like the Pro+ model<\/a>, a kind of leather texture and a huge camera module on the back – the Chinese manufacturer calls this Golden Ratio Skyline design. Apart from that, the looks of both X90 smartphones are very similar and the value is also worth emphasizing. Analogous to the predecessor, the X90 Pro comes exclusively in the black\u00a0color on the local market. A gray variant is also available as an import device. <\/p>\n

Like the X80 Pro,\u00a0<\/a>the X90 Pro is both dust- and water-resistant according to IP68 standard. With 90.8 percent, the upper-class phone also has a very efficient ratio of the screen to the total surface on the front. Speaking of the display, the manufacturer does not specify which protective glass has been installed in the X90 Pro.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

{element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_334778’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_335318’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_335318’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_333210’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_333210’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_331187’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_331187’).checked = false;document.querySelectorAll(‘#showDeviceSize_334376’).forEach(element => {element.classList.add(‘hideEl’)});document.getElementById(‘showDeviceSizelabel_334376’).checked = false;return false;” title=”hide all”>\u274c<\/a><\/p>\n

164.35 mm \/ 6.47 inch<\/text>\n75.29 mm \/ 2.96 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n9.7 mm \/ 0.3819 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n\n\n221 g<\/text>0.4872 lbs<\/text><\/g><\/g>164.1 mm \/ 6.46 inch<\/text>\n74.5 mm \/ 2.93 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n9.3 mm \/ 0.3661 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n\n\n214.9 g<\/text>0.4738 lbs<\/text><\/g><\/g>162.9 mm \/ 6.41 inch<\/text>\n76.6 mm \/ 3.02 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n8.9 mm \/ 0.3504 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n\n\n212 g<\/text>0.4674 lbs<\/text><\/g><\/g>163 mm \/ 6.42 inch<\/text>\n75.4 mm \/ 2.97 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n8.75 mm \/ 0.3445 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n\n\n203.5 g<\/text>0.4486 lbs<\/text><\/g><\/g>152.8 mm \/ 6.02 inch<\/text>\n71.5 mm \/ 2.81 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n7.98 mm \/ 0.3142 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n\n\n189 g<\/text>0.4167 lbs<\/text><\/g><\/g>148 mm \/ 5.83 inch<\/text>\n105 mm \/ 4.13 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n1 mm \/ 0.03937 inch<\/text>\n<\/g>\n\n\n1.5 g<\/text>0.00331 lbs<\/text><\/g><\/g><\/svg><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

In terms of equipment, the X90 Pro features a dual speaker system, Bluetooth 5.3, fast UFS 4.0 storage, and an NFC chip for contactless payment. In addition, Vivo relies on a USB 3.2 port (Gen. 1), which enables high data transfers and wired image output via HDMI or DisplayPort interfaces. In our copy test including a connected M2.SSD hard drive (Samsung 980 Pro), the USB port’s transfer rate is 212 MB\/s, which is clearly below the theoretical peak level.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The Vivo X90 Pro comes with Google Android 13 and the in-house Funtouch OS 13 installed. If you are interested in importing the X90 Pro, you should consider that Vivo does not use the Funtouch interface in China, but the Chinese equivalent Origin OS.<\/p>\n

Funtouch OS 13 has security patches from January 2023 at the time of the test. How long the Vivo smartphone will enjoy OS upgrades and security updates has not been officially communicated\u00a0<\/span>– the X80 Pro had updates for three years.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The transfer rates in the home network are high with the Vivo phone since the WLAN module communicates with our reference router Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 in the 2.4 and 5 GHz range as well as via the 6 GHz frequency band. However, the low reception rates in both the 5- and 6-GHz ranges are noticeable. Access to the LTE network including many supported 4G frequencies is guaranteed, and switching to the fast 5G standard is also possible<\/span>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Networking<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
iperf3 receive AXE11000<\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>1787 (min: 928)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c100%<\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

iperf3 transmit AXE11000<\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>227 (min: 115)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c23%<\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz<\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>229 (min: 219)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c12%<\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz<\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>1814 (min: 1250)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c100%<\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Xiaomi 13<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
iperf3 receive AXE11000<\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>894 (min: 803)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c50%<\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

iperf3 transmit AXE11000<\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>770 (min: 459)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c78%<\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz<\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>1894 (min: 955)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c100%<\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz<\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>1656 (min: 1620)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c91%<\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a>
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
iperf3 receive AXE11000<\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>904 (min: 453)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c51%<\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

iperf3 transmit AXE11000<\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>945 (min: 917)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c96%<\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

OnePlus 10T<\/a>
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
iperf3 receive AXE11000<\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>934 (min: 768)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c52%<\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

iperf3 transmit AXE11000<\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>933 (min: 865)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c95%<\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
iperf3 receive AXE11000<\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>931 (min: 890)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c52%<\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

iperf3 transmit AXE11000<\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n
\n<\/span>981 (min: 965)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c100%<\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Smartphone<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
iperf3 receive AXE11000<\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span>630 (min: 34.8)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c35%<\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

iperf3 transmit AXE11000<\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span>668 (min: 40.5)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c68%<\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz<\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span>1509 (min: 229)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c80%<\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz<\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span>1396 (min: 598)<\/span> MBit\/s \u223c77%<\/span><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n
\n0<\/text>95<\/text>190<\/text>285<\/text>380<\/text>475<\/text>570<\/text>665<\/text>760<\/text>855<\/text>950<\/text>1045<\/text>1140<\/text>1235<\/text>1330<\/text>1425<\/text>1520<\/text>1615<\/text>1710<\/text>1805<\/text><\/g>Tooltip<\/text><\/svg><\/p>\n
\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: \u00d8229 (219-238) <\/span><\/p>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: \u00d81810 (1250-1867) <\/span><\/p>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: \u00d81752 (928-1850) <\/span><\/p>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: \u00d8223 (115-235) <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

We check the tracking accuracy with a practical test on a bicycle. During our short trip, we recorded the route with a Garmin Venu 2 for comparison purposes. From time to time, the determined curve profiles deviate from the actual route, but the deviations in the detailed view of the GPS recording can still be rated as very low overall.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\"Test<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
\n

The dual-SIM smartphone supports VoLTE, and calls are also allowed via the home WLAN (WiFi calling). In contrast to the predecessor<\/a> Vivo flagship now supports an eSIM.<\/p>\n

The voice quality of the X90 Pro is inconspicuous. Voices are reproduced cleanly and our interlocutor also characterized them as clear.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The 32 MP front-facing camera enables decent selfies, but the relatively dark pictures of the portrait mode are conspicuous. <\/p>\n

The centerpiece of the camera group on the back with ZEISS branding is, as with the X90 Pro+<\/a>,\u00a0the large 1-inch Sony sensor, which delivers really good pictures during the day as well as at night. The photos sometimes look too brightened, but have a good basic sharpness – sometimes the autofocus does not always fit (see rabbit motifs). The photos tend to be a bit softer, which is not as good as the over-sharpened photo of the Apple iPhone 14 Pro<\/a> more natural compared to the over-sharpened photo of the iPhone 14 Pro. The Vivo phone cannot completely convince in terms of color reproduction; green tones are displayed a bit too brightly. However, users who prefer natural colors can activate the Zeiss mode. <\/p>\n

In contrast to the predecessor<\/a> the X90 Pro has to do without a high-resolution ultra-wide-angle camera. The photos look a bit noisy even in good light conditions and lack details. In return, the Vivo phone has quite good zoom qualities, although it does not have a periscope camera and only a 2x lossless zoom. However, the X90 Pro retains many details up to a five-fold magnification. The dedicated Vivo V2 image processor and in-house software optimizations ensure solid image quality in this respect.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Image Comparison<\/b><\/p>\n

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.<\/p>\n

Main camera<\/a>Main camera<\/a>Ultra wide-angle<\/a>Low Light<\/a>5x Zoom<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

<\/p>\n

click to load images<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\"ColorChecker<\/picture>\n
\n

11.6 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

4.2 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

10.3 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

17.9 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

9.1 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

7.7 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

3.1 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

10.8 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

3.8 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

6.9 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

7.5 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

3.3 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

5.6 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

12.2 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

4.1 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

3 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

5.9 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

10.5 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

6.5 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

5.8 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

9.3 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

8.9 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

6.3 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

2.5 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>

ColorChecker Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>: 7.36\u00a0\u2206E min: 2.47 – max: 17.92\u00a0\u2206E<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\n
\"ColorChecker<\/picture>\n
\n

17.1 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

24.5 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

23.9 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

21.7 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

26.7 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

29.2 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

28.2 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

18.9 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

20.1 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

18.8 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

27.2 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

34.2 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

17.1 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

25.3 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

14.8 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

25 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

24.9 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

26.4 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

26.6 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

27.9 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

31.4 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

27.1 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

20.6 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

12.9 \u2206E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>

ColorChecker Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>: 23.77\u00a0\u2206E min: 12.85 – max: 34.24\u00a0\u2206E<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
\n

The Vivo phone comes with a modular 120-watt power supply, a USB cable, and a protective case. A protective film is also installed ex-factory.<\/p>\n

The Warranty<\/a> is 24 months after the purchase date.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

A real feature of the predecessor\u00a0X80 Pro<\/a> is the huge 3D ultrasonic fingerprint sensor, which we also saw in the X90 Pro+<\/a>. However, the X90 Pro only has an optical fingerprint sensor, so the area is much smaller, only one finger can be scanned, and the recognition rate cannot keep up with the class leader of the predecessor. It is a pity that Vivo has skimped here. However, the X90 Pro still features biometric authentication via 2D facial recognition using the front-facing camera.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\"Subpixel<\/a>
Subpixel structure<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
\n

At first glance, not much has changed in the display. Like the predecessor, the OLED panel of the X90 Pro measures 6.78 inches diagonally and has a refresh rate of up to 120 Hz. An adaptive adjustment of the frequency is still not possible, but an automatic switching between 60 Hz and 120 Hz is available. A big difference is seen in the pixel density. While the Vivo X80 Pro<\/a> is equipped with a QHD+ resolution, the AMOLED display of the X90 Pro only works with Full HD+.<\/p>\n

The Vivo smartphone uses PWM with a very low frequency of 60 Hz to control the luminance, which is typical for OLEDs, but the fluctuations are small. The maximum luminance of over 1000 cd\/m\u00b2 in the peak that we measured is very good, and the realistic APL18 test (Average Picture Level) also results in a satisfactory maximum brightness of 1225 cd\/m\u00b2 for this price range. A Xiaomi 13<\/a> is considerably brighter with 1,765 cd\/m\u00b2.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n1002
cd\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n		1024
cd\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n		1054
cd\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n1005
cd\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n		1018
cd\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n		1063
cd\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n993
cd\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n		1017
cd\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n		1059
cd\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

Distribution of brightness<\/i><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

X-Rite i1Pro 3<\/p>\n

Maximum: 1063\u00a0cd\/m\u00b2 (Nits) Average: 1026.1\u00a0cd\/m\u00b2 Minimum: 2.15\u00a0cd\/m\u00b2
Brightness Distribution:\u00a093 %
Center on Battery: 1018\u00a0cd\/m\u00b2<\/span>
Contrast: \u221e:1 (Black: 0\u00a0cd\/m\u00b2)
\u0394E Color 0.9 | 0.59-29.43 \u00d85.2
\u0394E Greyscale 1.9 | 0.57-98 \u00d85.4
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
<\/th>\nVivo X90 Pro<\/a>
AMOLED, 2800×1260, 6.78<\/span><\/th>\n		Xiaomi 13<\/a>
OLED, 2400×1080, 6.36<\/span><\/th>\n		Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a>
OLED, 3120×1440, 6.70<\/span><\/th>\n		OnePlus 10T<\/a>
Fluid AMOLED, 2412×1080, 6.70<\/span><\/th>\n		Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>
AMOLED, 3200×1440, 6.78<\/span><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
Screen<\/td>\n<\/td>\n\n

-6%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

9%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-54%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-5%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Brightness middle<\/td>\n\n

1018<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

1209 <\/p>\n

19%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

1022 <\/p>\n

0%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

861 <\/p>\n

-15%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

1109 <\/p>\n

9%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Brightness<\/td>\n\n

1026<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

1208 <\/p>\n

18%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

1025 <\/p>\n

0%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

856 <\/p>\n

-17%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

1124 <\/p>\n

10%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Brightness Distribution<\/td>\n\n

93<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

98 <\/p>\n

5%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

99 <\/p>\n

6%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

97 <\/p>\n

4%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

96 <\/p>\n

3%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Black Level *<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Colorchecker dE 2000 *<\/td>\n\n

0.9<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

1.2 <\/p>\n

-33%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

0.9 <\/p>\n

-0%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

2.27 <\/p>\n

-152%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

1.1 <\/p>\n

-22%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *<\/td>\n\n

2.2<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

3 <\/p>\n

-36%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

2.1 <\/p>\n

5%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

4.17 <\/p>\n

-90%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

2.7 <\/p>\n

-23%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Greyscale dE 2000 *<\/td>\n\n

1.9<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

2.1 <\/p>\n

-11%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

1.1 <\/p>\n

42%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

2.9 <\/p>\n

-53%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

2 <\/p>\n

-5%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Gamma<\/td>\n\n

2.26 97%<\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.26 97%<\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.22 99%<\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.303 96%<\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.25 98%<\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

CCT<\/td>\n\n

6473 100%<\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6504 100%<\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6650 98%<\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6141 106%<\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6605 98%<\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

* … smaller is better<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Screen Flickering \/ PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)<\/h3>\n
\n

\u2139<\/p>\n

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession – a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n
Screen flickering \/ PWM detected <\/span><\/td>\n60 Hz<\/span><\/td>\n<\/td>\n\n
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

The display backlight flickers at 60\u00a0Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) . <\/p>\n

The frequency of 60\u00a0Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.<\/p>\n

In comparison: 53\u00a0% of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19288 (minimum: 5 – maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings<\/i><\/p>\n

\n

Our display color analysis is performed with the help of a photospectrometer and the Calman software. The deviations in the color (0.9) and grayscale (1.9) representation are very low in the ZEISS profile and the color temperature of the panel is almost optimally calibrated. The high coverage of the color spaces is also worth mentioning; even the DCI-P3 is covered almost completely.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Display Response Times<\/h3>\n
\n

\u2139<\/p>\n

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>\u2194\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span> Response Time Black to White<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
1.35 ms<\/span> … rise \u2197 and fall \u2198 combined<\/td>\n\u2197 0.6915 ms rise<\/td>\n\n
\u2198 0.6615 ms fall<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. \u00bb 1\u00a0% of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.6 ms).<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>\u2194\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span> Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
1.56 ms<\/span> … rise \u2197 and fall \u2198 combined<\/td>\n\u2197 ms rise<\/td>\n\n
\u2198 ms fall<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. \u00bb 2\u00a0% of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.6 ms).<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Outdoors, the X90 Pro makes a very good impression thanks to the high brightness in automatic mode. Even in midsummer sunlight, the display content should still be sufficiently visible. However, those who prefer to adjust the brightness manually will have to be content with 525 cd\/m\u00b2 and partly annoying reflections.<\/p>\n

The viewing angles of the OLED panel are very good and the brightness drop is only noticeable from an extremely flat angle.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The X90 Pro features the latest flagship SoC from MediaTek, which is manufactured by TSMC in a second-generation 4 nm process. The chipset combines an ARM Cortex X3 core (3.05 GHz) with three ARM Cortex A715 performance cores (2.85 GHz) and four frugal Cortex A510 cores (1.8 GHz). For the graphics unit, MediaTek relies on the new ARM\u00a0Immortalis G715 with eleven cores.<\/p>\n

Compared to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2<\/a> in the Pro+ model<\/a> the single-core performance of the MediaTek Dimensity 9200 <\/a>is lower by 7% and the multi-thread performance by 12%. PCMark’s system benchmark also turns out relatively low.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Geekbench 5.4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Single-Core<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1489<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +8%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Xiaomi 13<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1478<\/span> Points \u223c99%<\/span><\/span> +7%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1384<\/span> Points \u223c93%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> MediaTek Dimensity 9200<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>1384<\/span> Points \u223c93%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

OnePlus 10T<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1277<\/span> Points \u223c86%<\/span><\/span> -8%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a>
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1048<\/span> Points \u223c70%<\/span><\/span> -24%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Smartphone<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (119 – 1885, n=259, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n <\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>786<\/span> Points \u223c53%<\/span><\/span> -43%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Multi-Core<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Xiaomi 13<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>5090<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +20%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>4786<\/span> Points \u223c94%<\/span><\/span> +13%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>4232<\/span> Points \u223c83%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> MediaTek Dimensity 9200<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>4232<\/span> Points \u223c83%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

OnePlus 10T<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>3987<\/span> Points \u223c78%<\/span><\/span> -6%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a>
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>3222<\/span> Points \u223c63%<\/span><\/span> -24%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Smartphone<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (466 – 5538, n=259, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>2518<\/span> Points \u223c49%<\/span><\/span> -41%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Antutu v9 – Total Score<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Xiaomi 13<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1273775<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +8%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1262638<\/span> Points \u223c99%<\/span><\/span> +7%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1175789<\/span> Points \u223c92%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> MediaTek Dimensity 9200<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>1175789<\/span> Points \u223c92%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

OnePlus 10T<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>846323<\/span> Points \u223c66%<\/span><\/span> -28%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a>
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>773857<\/span> Points \u223c61%<\/span><\/span> -34%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Smartphone<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (111952 – 1300282, n=167, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>621118<\/span> Points \u223c49%<\/span><\/span> -47%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
PCMark for Android – Work 3.0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
OnePlus 10T<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>15944<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +63%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Xiaomi 13<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>14094<\/span> Points \u223c88%<\/span><\/span> +44%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>12748<\/span> Points \u223c80%<\/span><\/span> +31%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a>
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>11397<\/span> Points \u223c71%<\/span><\/span> +17%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Smartphone<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (4436 – 19200, n=226, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>10455<\/span> Points \u223c66%<\/span><\/span> +7%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>9765<\/span> Points \u223c61%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> MediaTek Dimensity 9200<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>9765<\/span> Points \u223c61%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
CrossMark – Overall<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Xiaomi 13<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1219<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +31%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1038<\/span> Points \u223c85%<\/span><\/span> +11%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>932<\/span> Points \u223c76%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> MediaTek Dimensity 9200<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>932<\/span> Points \u223c76%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a>
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>886<\/span> Points \u223c73%<\/span><\/span> -5%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

OnePlus 10T<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>806<\/span> Points \u223c66%<\/span><\/span> -14%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Smartphone<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (226 – 1332, n=105, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>805<\/span> Points \u223c66%<\/span><\/span> -14%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
BaseMark OS II<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Overall<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
OnePlus 10T<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>8320<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +23%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Xiaomi 13<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>8153<\/span> Points \u223c98%<\/span><\/span> +21%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>7684<\/span> Points \u223c92%<\/span><\/span> +14%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>6755<\/span> Points \u223c81%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> MediaTek Dimensity 9200<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>6755<\/span> Points \u223c81%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a>
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>6164<\/span> Points \u223c74%<\/span><\/span> -9%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Smartphone<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (411 – 9555, n=172, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>4934<\/span> Points \u223c59%<\/span><\/span> -27%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

System<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Xiaomi 13<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>13646<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +40%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>12847<\/span> Points \u223c94%<\/span><\/span> +32%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

OnePlus 10T<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>12230<\/span> Points \u223c90%<\/span><\/span> +25%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>9767<\/span> Points \u223c72%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> MediaTek Dimensity 9200<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>9767<\/span> Points \u223c72%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a>
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>9294<\/span> Points \u223c68%<\/span><\/span> -5%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Smartphone<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (2083 – 19657, n=172, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>8603<\/span> Points \u223c63%<\/span><\/span> -12%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Memory<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>9245<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> MediaTek Dimensity 9200<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>9245<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

OnePlus 10T<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>8822<\/span> Points \u223c95%<\/span><\/span> -5%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Xiaomi 13<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>8179<\/span> Points \u223c88%<\/span><\/span> -12%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>7330<\/span> Points \u223c79%<\/span><\/span> -21%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Smartphone<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (670 – 11617, n=172, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>5488<\/span> Points \u223c59%<\/span><\/span> -41%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a>
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>5456<\/span> Points \u223c59%<\/span><\/span> -41%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Graphics<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>27698<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> MediaTek Dimensity 9200<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>27698<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

OnePlus 10T<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>24037<\/span> Points \u223c87%<\/span><\/span> -13%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Xiaomi 13<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>23966<\/span> Points \u223c87%<\/span><\/span> -13%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>22837<\/span> Points \u223c82%<\/span><\/span> -18%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a>
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>16375<\/span> Points \u223c59%<\/span><\/span> -41%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Smartphone<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (697 – 28497, n=172, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>10147<\/span> Points \u223c37%<\/span><\/span> -63%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Web<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
OnePlus 10T<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1833<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +117%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a>
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1739<\/span> Points \u223c95%<\/span><\/span> +106%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Xiaomi 13<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1652<\/span> Points \u223c90%<\/span><\/span> +96%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1564<\/span> Points \u223c85%<\/span><\/span> +86%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Smartphone<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (10 – 2392, n=172, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>1439<\/span> Points \u223c79%<\/span><\/span> +71%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>843<\/span> Points \u223c46%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> MediaTek Dimensity 9200<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>843<\/span> Points \u223c46%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
UL Procyon AI Inference – Overall Score<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>44483<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> MediaTek Dimensity 9200<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>44483<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a>
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>42662<\/span> Points \u223c96%<\/span><\/span> -4%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Smartphone<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span> (207 – 84787, n=101, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>23828<\/span> Points \u223c54%<\/span><\/span> -46%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>16465<\/span> Points \u223c37%<\/span><\/span> -63%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Xiaomi 13<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>15961<\/span> Points \u223c36%<\/span><\/span> -64%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

OnePlus 10T<\/a>
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>11648<\/span> Points \u223c26%<\/span><\/span> -74%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The MediaTek Dimensity 9200<\/a><\/span> performs well in GFXBench’s graphics tests. However, even the onscreen rates are often lower than in the Pro+ model<\/a>\u00a0which has to cope with the significantly higher resolution. The browser benchmarks and the BaseMark OS II browser test are also conspicuously low.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
3DMark \/ Wild Life Extreme Unlimited<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>3792<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Xiaomi 13<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>3707<\/span> Points \u223c98%<\/span><\/span> -2%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>3173<\/span> Points \u223c84%<\/span><\/span> -16%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

OnePlus 10T<\/a>
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>2876<\/span> Points \u223c76%<\/span><\/span> -24%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a>
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1807<\/span> Points \u223c48%<\/span><\/span> -52%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
3DMark \/ Wild Life Extreme<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>3783<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Xiaomi 13<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>3751<\/span> Points \u223c99%<\/span><\/span> -1%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>3192<\/span> Points \u223c84%<\/span><\/span> -16%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

OnePlus 10T<\/a>
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>2824<\/span> Points \u223c75%<\/span><\/span> -25%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a>
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>1847<\/span> Points \u223c49%<\/span><\/span> -51%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
3DMark \/ Wild Life Unlimited Score<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>14038<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +4%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Xiaomi 13<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>14002<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +4%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>13492<\/span> Points \u223c96%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

OnePlus 10T<\/a>
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>10989<\/span> Points \u223c78%<\/span><\/span> -19%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a>
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>6721<\/span> Points \u223c48%<\/span><\/span> -50%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
GFXBench (DX \/ GLBenchmark) 2.7 \/ T-Rex Onscreen<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a>
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>120<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Xiaomi 13<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>120<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>120<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>120<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

OnePlus 10T<\/a>
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>60<\/span> fps \u223c50%<\/span><\/span> -50%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
GFXBench (DX \/ GLBenchmark) 2.7 \/ T-Rex Offscreen<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>490<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +9%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>451<\/span> fps \u223c92%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

OnePlus 10T<\/a>
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>435<\/span> fps \u223c89%<\/span><\/span> -4%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Xiaomi 13<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>395<\/span> fps \u223c81%<\/span><\/span> -12%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a>
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>251<\/span> fps \u223c51%<\/span><\/span> -44%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
GFXBench 3.0 \/ Manhattan Onscreen OGL<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Xiaomi 13<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>120<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>120<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>119<\/span> fps \u223c99%<\/span><\/span> -1%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a>
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>84<\/span> fps \u223c70%<\/span><\/span> -30%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

OnePlus 10T<\/a>
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>60<\/span> fps \u223c50%<\/span><\/span> -50%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
GFXBench 3.0 \/ 1080p Manhattan Offscreen<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>299<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +13%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>265<\/span> fps \u223c89%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Xiaomi 13<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>257<\/span> fps \u223c86%<\/span><\/span> -3%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

OnePlus 10T<\/a>
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>221<\/span> fps \u223c74%<\/span><\/span> -17%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a>
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>139<\/span> fps \u223c46%<\/span><\/span> -48%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
GFXBench 3.1 \/ Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Xiaomi 13<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>120<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +15%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>106<\/span> fps \u223c88%<\/span><\/span> +2%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>104<\/span> fps \u223c87%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

OnePlus 10T<\/a>
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>60<\/span> fps \u223c50%<\/span><\/span> -42%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a>
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>56<\/span> fps \u223c47%<\/span><\/span> -46%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
GFXBench 3.1 \/ Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>218<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +93%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Xiaomi 13<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>181<\/span> fps \u223c83%<\/span><\/span> +60%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

OnePlus 10T<\/a>
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>171<\/span> fps \u223c78%<\/span><\/span> +51%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>113<\/span> fps \u223c52%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a>
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>101<\/span> fps \u223c46%<\/span><\/span> -11%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
GFXBench \/ Car Chase Onscreen<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Xiaomi 13<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>93<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +15%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>81<\/span> fps \u223c87%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>62<\/span> fps \u223c67%<\/span><\/span> -23%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

OnePlus 10T<\/a>
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>60<\/span> fps \u223c65%<\/span><\/span> -26%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a>
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>37<\/span> fps \u223c40%<\/span><\/span> -54%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
GFXBench \/ Car Chase Offscreen<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>127<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +43%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

OnePlus 10T<\/a>
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>108<\/span> fps \u223c85%<\/span><\/span> +21%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Xiaomi 13<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>105<\/span> fps \u223c83%<\/span><\/span> +18%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>89<\/span> fps \u223c70%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a>
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>68<\/span> fps \u223c54%<\/span><\/span> -24%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
GFXBench \/ Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>82<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Xiaomi 13<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>66<\/span> fps \u223c80%<\/span><\/span> -20%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

OnePlus 10T<\/a>
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>59<\/span> fps \u223c72%<\/span><\/span> -28%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>50<\/span> fps \u223c61%<\/span><\/span> -39%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a>
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>28<\/span> fps \u223c34%<\/span><\/span> -66%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
GFXBench \/ Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>61<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +20%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Xiaomi 13<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>56<\/span> fps \u223c92%<\/span><\/span> +10%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>51<\/span> fps \u223c84%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

OnePlus 10T<\/a>
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>44<\/span> fps \u223c72%<\/span><\/span> -14%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a>
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>31<\/span> fps \u223c51%<\/span><\/span> -39%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
GFXBench \/ Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Xiaomi 13<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>113<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +8%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>105<\/span> fps \u223c93%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n <\/span>80<\/span> fps \u223c71%<\/span><\/span> -24%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

OnePlus 10T<\/a>
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>60<\/span> fps \u223c53%<\/span><\/span> -43%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a>
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>38<\/span> fps \u223c34%<\/span><\/span> -64%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
GFXBench \/ Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>156<\/span> fps \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +41%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Xiaomi 13<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>142<\/span> fps \u223c91%<\/span><\/span> +28%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

OnePlus 10T<\/a>
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>123<\/span> fps \u223c79%<\/span><\/span> +11%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>111<\/span> fps \u223c71%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a>
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>75<\/span> fps \u223c48%<\/span><\/span> -32%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Jetstream 2 – Total Score<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Xiaomi 13<\/a> (Chrome 108)<\/span><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>143.264<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +112%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a> (Chrome Beta 110)<\/span><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>116.455<\/span> Points \u223c81%<\/span><\/span> +72%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a> (Chrome 106)<\/span><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>98.153<\/span> Points \u223c69%<\/span><\/span> +45%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

OnePlus 10T<\/a> (Chrome 104)<\/span><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>81.383<\/span> Points \u223c57%<\/span><\/span> +20%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Smartphone<\/a> (14.8 – 282, n=169, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>80<\/span> Points \u223c56%<\/span><\/span> +18%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a> (Chrome 109)<\/span><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>67.646<\/span> Points \u223c47%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> MediaTek Dimensity 9200<\/a><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>67.6<\/span> Points \u223c47%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Speedometer 2.0 – Result<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Xiaomi 13<\/a> (Chrome 108)<\/span><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>113<\/span> runs\/min \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +88%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a> (Chrome 106)<\/span><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>104<\/span> runs\/min \u223c92%<\/span><\/span> +73%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

OnePlus 10T<\/a> (Chrome 104)<\/span><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>93.4<\/span> runs\/min \u223c83%<\/span><\/span> +55%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Smartphone<\/a> (12.8 – 375, n=157, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>75.4<\/span> runs\/min \u223c67%<\/span><\/span> +25%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a> (Chrome 109)<\/span><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>60.2<\/span> runs\/min \u223c53%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> MediaTek Dimensity 9200<\/a><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>60.2<\/span> runs\/min \u223c53%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
WebXPRT 4 – Overall Score<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a> (Chrome Beta 110)<\/span><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>139<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +111%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Xiaomi 13<\/a> (Chrome 108)<\/span><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>136<\/span> Points \u223c98%<\/span><\/span> +106%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Smartphone<\/a> (25 – 202, n=63, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>94<\/span> Points \u223c68%<\/span><\/span> +42%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a> (Chrome 106)<\/span><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>90<\/span> Points \u223c65%<\/span><\/span> +36%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

OnePlus 10T<\/a><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>75<\/span> Points \u223c54%<\/span><\/span> +14%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a> (Chrome 109)<\/span><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>66<\/span> Points \u223c47%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> MediaTek Dimensity 9200<\/a><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>66<\/span> Points \u223c47%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
WebXPRT 3 – —<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
OnePlus 10T<\/a> (Chrome 104)<\/span><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>106<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +29%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Smartphone<\/a> (27 – 292, n=163, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>105.5<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +29%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a> (Chrome 106)<\/span><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>98<\/span> Points \u223c92%<\/span><\/span> +20%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a> (Chrome 109)<\/span><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>82<\/span> Points \u223c77%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> MediaTek Dimensity 9200<\/a><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>82<\/span> Points \u223c77%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Octane V2 – Total Score<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a> (Chrome 106)<\/span><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>44245<\/span> Points \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +104%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Xiaomi 13<\/a> (Chrome 108)<\/span><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n <\/span>43632<\/span> Points \u223c99%<\/span><\/span> +102%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

OnePlus 10T<\/a> (Chrome 104)<\/span><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>39982<\/span> Points \u223c90%<\/span><\/span> +85%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average of class<\/span> Smartphone<\/a> (3905 – 74261, n=196, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>28257<\/span> Points \u223c64%<\/span><\/span> +31%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a> (Chrome Beta 110)<\/span><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>27938<\/span> Points \u223c63%<\/span><\/span> +29%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a> (Chrome 109)<\/span><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>21648<\/span> Points \u223c49%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> MediaTek Dimensity 9200<\/a><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>21648<\/span> Points \u223c49%<\/span><\/span> 0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 – Total Score<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Average of class<\/span> Smartphone<\/a> (414 – 12437, n=179, last 2 years)<\/span><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>2309<\/span> ms * \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> -25%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Average<\/span> MediaTek Dimensity 9200<\/a><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span>1848<\/span> ms * \u223c80%<\/span><\/span> -0%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a> (Chrome 109)<\/span><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>1847.5<\/span> ms * \u223c80%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a> (Chrome Beta 110)<\/span><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>1773.4<\/span> ms * \u223c77%<\/span><\/span> +4%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

OnePlus 10T<\/a> (Chrome 104)<\/span><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>1627.3<\/span> ms * \u223c70%<\/span><\/span> +12%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a> (Chrome 106)<\/span><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>1011.5<\/span> ms * \u223c44%<\/span><\/span> +45%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Xiaomi 13<\/a> (Chrome 108)<\/span><\/td>\n\n
\n


\n<\/span>870.7<\/span> ms * \u223c38%<\/span><\/span> +53%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n

* … smaller is better<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
<\/th>\nVivo X90 Pro<\/a><\/th>\nXiaomi 13<\/a><\/th>\nGoogle Pixel 7 Pro<\/a><\/th>\nOnePlus 10T<\/a><\/th>\nVivo X90 Pro+<\/a><\/th>\nAverage<\/span> 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/a><\/th>\nAverage of class<\/span> Smartphone<\/a><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
AndroBench 3-5<\/td>\n<\/td>\n\n

1%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-56%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-60%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-3%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-5%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-64%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Sequential Read 256KB<\/td>\n\n

3866.75<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

3454.01 <\/p>\n

-11%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

1346.78 <\/p>\n

-65%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

1568.37 <\/p>\n

-59%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

3397.4 <\/p>\n

-12%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n
Sequential Write 256KB<\/td>\n\n

2643.38<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

2722.77 <\/p>\n

3%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

874.73 <\/p>\n

-67%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

847.69 <\/p>\n

-68%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

2834.4 <\/p>\n

7%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n
Random Read 4KB<\/td>\n\n

367.89<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

393.81 <\/p>\n

7%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

219.01 <\/p>\n

-40%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

173.45 <\/p>\n

-53%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

373.88 <\/p>\n

2%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n
Random Write 4KB<\/td>\n\n

521.43<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

536.76 <\/p>\n

3%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

253.18 <\/p>\n

-51%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

211.24 <\/p>\n

-59%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

484.29 <\/p>\n

-7%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n
\n

199.7 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?<\/a>(13 – 552, n=251, last 2 years)<\/span><\/p>\n

-62%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The graphics performance of the Immortalis G715 offers enough graphics performance for demanding games like PUBG mobile even at the highest details for smooth playback at a constant 40 fps. The shooter is played constantly at about 60 FPS with the HD graphics setting, the new 90-fps mode is not available due to a frame lock on Vivo’s part – we use GameBench’s app to determine our frame rates<\/a>. <\/p>\n

The full 120 Hz of the OLED panel is generally not supported in our test games. We also measured 60 fps in Armajet, although the arena shooter theoretically allows 144 fps. The open-world action RPG Genshin Impact is even only rendered at 30 fps with the X90 Pro.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n0<\/text>5<\/text>10<\/text>15<\/text>20<\/text>25<\/text>30<\/text>35<\/text>40<\/text>45<\/text>50<\/text>55<\/text>60<\/text><\/g>Tooltip<\/text><\/svg><\/div>\n
\n

The surface temperatures are very low in our measurements. There is hardly any temperature development even under load. However, the X90 Pro shows a moderate performance loss of 20 to 25 percent in the 3DMark stress tests.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n26.3 \u00b0C
79 F<\/td>\n		26.4 \u00b0C
80 F<\/td>\n		27 \u00b0C
81 F<\/td>\n		\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n26.5 \u00b0C
80 F<\/td>\n		26.5 \u00b0C
80 F<\/td>\n		27 \u00b0C
81 F<\/td>\n		\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n26.6 \u00b0C
80 F<\/td>\n		26.7 \u00b0C
80 F<\/td>\n		26.8 \u00b0C
80 F<\/td>\n		\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Maximum: 27 \u00b0C = 81 F
Average: 26.6 \u00b0C = 80 F<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n25.8 \u00b0C
78 F<\/td>\n		25.9 \u00b0C
79 F<\/td>\n		25.8 \u00b0C
78 F<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n25.8 \u00b0C
78 F<\/td>\n		25.7 \u00b0C
78 F<\/td>\n		25.8 \u00b0C
78 F<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n25.6 \u00b0C
78 F<\/td>\n		25.9 \u00b0C
79 F<\/td>\n		26 \u00b0C
79 F<\/td>\n		<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Maximum: 26 \u00b0C = 79 F
Average: 25.8 \u00b0C = 78 F<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n

Power Supply (max.)\u00a0 23.8 \u00b0C = 75 F | Room Temperature\u00a021.3 \u00b0C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

(+)<\/span> The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 26.6 \u00b0C \/ 80 F, compared to the average of 32.7 \u00b0C \/ 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+)<\/span> The maximum temperature on the upper side is 27 \u00b0C \/ 81 F, compared to the average of 34.9 \u00b0C \/ 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 52.9 \u00b0C for the class Smartphone.
(+)<\/span> The bottom heats up to a maximum of 26 \u00b0C \/ 79 F, compared to the average of 33.7 \u00b0C \/ 93 F
(+)<\/span> In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 \u00b0C \/ 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 \u00b0C \/ 91 F.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
3DMark<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Wild Life Stress Test Stability<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
OnePlus 10T<\/a>
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>92.7<\/span> % \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +25%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>88.5<\/span> % \u223c95%<\/span><\/span> +19%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Xiaomi 13<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>78.9<\/span> % \u223c85%<\/span><\/span> +6%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>74.1<\/span> % \u223c80%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a>
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>67.9<\/span> % \u223c73%<\/span><\/span> -8%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Wild Life Extreme Stress Test<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>87<\/span> % \u223c100%<\/span><\/span> +6%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a>
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>81.7<\/span> % \u223c94%<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Xiaomi 13<\/a>
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>79.1<\/span> % \u223c91%<\/span><\/span> -3%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a>
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span>75.6<\/span> % \u223c87%<\/span><\/span> -7%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

OnePlus 10T<\/a>
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash<\/span><\/td>\n		\n
\n


\n<\/span><\/span> % \u223c0%<\/span><\/span> -100%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

\n0<\/text>5<\/text>10<\/text>15<\/text>20<\/text>25<\/text>30<\/text>35<\/text>40<\/text>45<\/text>50<\/text>55<\/text>60<\/text>65<\/text>70<\/text>75<\/text>80<\/text><\/g>Tooltip<\/text><\/svg><\/p>\n
\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a> Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: \u00d819.9 (18.5-22.6) <\/span><\/p>\n

Xiaomi 13<\/a> Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: \u00d820.6 (17.7-22.4) <\/span><\/p>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a> Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: \u00d89.93 (8.31-11) <\/span><\/p>\n

Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a> Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: \u00d821.4 (19.4-22.3) <\/span><\/p>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a> Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: \u00d864.4 (58.3-78.6) <\/span><\/p>\n

Xiaomi 13<\/a> Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: \u00d868.6 (62.7-79.5) <\/span><\/p>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a> Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: \u00d832.8 (26.2-38.6) <\/span><\/p>\n

OnePlus 10T<\/a> Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: \u00d861.8 (59-63.6) <\/span><\/p>\n

Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a> Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: \u00d876.6 (70.7-80) <\/span><\/p>\n

Xiaomi 13<\/a> Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: \u00d880 (76.5-84.2) <\/span><\/p>\n

Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a> Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: \u00d836.5 (30.7-39.8) <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The stereo speakers reach a high maximum volume of over 92 dB(A) in our test. The sound output is characterized by tones from medium frequencies that could have been a bit more linear. However, a slight bass note is also recognizable. Alternatively, headphones can be connected via the USB-C port or wirelessly via Bluetooth.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n\ndB(A)<\/text>\n<\/g>0<\/text>10<\/text>20<\/text>30<\/text>40<\/text>50<\/text>60<\/text>70<\/text>80<\/text>90<\/text>Deep Bass<\/text>Middle Bass<\/text>High Bass<\/text>Lower Range<\/text>Mids<\/text>Higher Mids<\/text>Lower Highs<\/text>Mid Highs<\/text>Upper Highs<\/text>Super Highs<\/text>20<\/text>33.8<\/text>36.2<\/text>25<\/text>27.9<\/text>36.5<\/text>31<\/text>24.3<\/text>38.1<\/text>40<\/text>28.2<\/text>36.1<\/text>50<\/text>36.7<\/text>36.8<\/text>63<\/text>22.2<\/text>39.3<\/text>80<\/text>25.4<\/text>40.4<\/text>100<\/text>21<\/text>42.8<\/text>125<\/text>18.6<\/text>45.3<\/text>160<\/text>15.4<\/text>55.9<\/text>200<\/text>15.1<\/text>54.1<\/text>250<\/text>13.1<\/text>55.5<\/text>315<\/text>12<\/text>55.3<\/text>400<\/text>12.7<\/text>53.8<\/text>500<\/text>11.8<\/text>66.5<\/text>630<\/text>12.9<\/text>68.9<\/text>800<\/text>10.4<\/text>72.3<\/text>1000<\/text>13.3<\/text>72.9<\/text>1250<\/text>13.2<\/text>79.1<\/text>1600<\/text>12.1<\/text>79.4<\/text>2000<\/text>12.2<\/text>81.6<\/text>2500<\/text>12.9<\/text>83.7<\/text>3150<\/text>14.8<\/text>83.7<\/text>4000<\/text>15.8<\/text>81.6<\/text>5000<\/text>16.1<\/text>82.7<\/text>6300<\/text>14.4<\/text>78.9<\/text>8000<\/text>13.6<\/text>78.2<\/text>10000<\/text>13.5<\/text>74.5<\/text>12500<\/text>14.4<\/text>69.4<\/text>16000<\/text>15<\/text>67<\/text>SPL<\/text>25.9<\/text>92.3<\/text>N<\/text>0.7<\/text>87.9<\/text>median 13.5<\/text>median 72.3<\/text>Delta<\/text>1.1<\/text>12.6<\/text>28.8<\/text>34.3<\/text>26.3<\/text>28.6<\/text>25.6<\/text>29.9<\/text>18.6<\/text>31.8<\/text>30.2<\/text>36.9<\/text>20.5<\/text>36.8<\/text>19.5<\/text>38.2<\/text>18.4<\/text>42.5<\/text>13.6<\/text>42.9<\/text>11.6<\/text>54.2<\/text>12<\/text>54.9<\/text>12<\/text>59.1<\/text>10.1<\/text>58.4<\/text>10.1<\/text>59.2<\/text>10.5<\/text>67.9<\/text>10.3<\/text>67.4<\/text>10<\/text>70.9<\/text>9.8<\/text>76.2<\/text>11.3<\/text>77.4<\/text>11.2<\/text>77.2<\/text>11.4<\/text>78.5<\/text>11.9<\/text>79.6<\/text>13.9<\/text>85.9<\/text>14.7<\/text>82.5<\/text>14<\/text>77.9<\/text>14.6<\/text>76.8<\/text>13.5<\/text>75.3<\/text>13.3<\/text>72.8<\/text>13.7<\/text>69.2<\/text>13.9<\/text>68.1<\/text>24.8<\/text>91.4<\/text>0.6<\/text>82.7<\/text>median 12<\/text>median 70.9<\/text>1.7<\/text>9.2<\/text>hearing range<\/text>hide median<\/text> Pink Noise<\/text> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_886363_0’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” \/> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_886363_0’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.pn_886363_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_886363_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});”>Vivo X90 Pro<\/text> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_886363_0’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” \/> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_886363_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” \/> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_886363_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” \/> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_880511_0’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” \/> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_880511_0’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.pn_880511_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_880511_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});”>Xiaomi 13<\/text> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_880511_0’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” \/> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_880511_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” \/> {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});document.querySelectorAll(‘.toggle_880511_1’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’)});” \/><\/svg><\/p>\n

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)<\/p>\n

\n
\n
Vivo X90 Pro audio analysis<\/h5>\n

(+)<\/span> | speakers can play relatively loud (92.3 dB)
Bass 100 – 315 Hz<\/i>
(-)<\/span> | nearly no bass – on average 20.8% lower than median
(+)<\/span> | bass is linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 – 2000 Hz<\/i>
(\u00b1)<\/span> | reduced mids – on average 6.4% lower than median
(+)<\/span> | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 – 16 kHz<\/i>
(\u00b1)<\/span> | higher highs – on average 8.2% higher than median
(+)<\/span> | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 – 16.000 Hz<\/i>
(\u00b1)<\/span> | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class<\/i>
\u00bb <\/b>11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
\u00bb <\/b>The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested<\/i>
\u00bb <\/b>37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
\u00bb <\/b>The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
Xiaomi 13 audio analysis<\/h5>\n

(+)<\/span> | speakers can play relatively loud (91.4 dB)
Bass 100 – 315 Hz<\/i>
(-)<\/span> | nearly no bass – on average 18.9% lower than median
(+)<\/span> | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 – 2000 Hz<\/i>
(\u00b1)<\/span> | higher mids – on average 5.5% higher than median
(+)<\/span> | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 – 16 kHz<\/i>
(\u00b1)<\/span> | higher highs – on average 7.8% higher than median
(+)<\/span> | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 – 16.000 Hz<\/i>
(\u00b1)<\/span> | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class<\/i>
\u00bb <\/b>4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 93% worse
\u00bb <\/b>The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested<\/i>
\u00bb <\/b>25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 69% worse
\u00bb <\/b>The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

When it comes to fast charging, the Vivo smartphone offers wired 120 watts and wireless 50 watts. We cannot verify how long a complete charging process takes since we were provided with a UK version for testing. Interestingly, the battery of the X90 Pro is operated at a high voltage of 7.78 volts, resulting in an equivalent capacity of 4,870 mAh (3.89V).<\/p>\n

The Vivo X90 Pro reveals an increased power consumption in idle mode in our measurements.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
<\/th>\nVivo X90 Pro<\/a>
4870\u00a0mAh<\/span><\/th>\n		Xiaomi 13<\/a>
4500\u00a0mAh<\/span><\/th>\n		Google Pixel 7 Pro<\/a>
5000\u00a0mAh<\/span><\/th>\n		OnePlus 10T<\/a>
4800\u00a0mAh<\/span><\/th>\n		Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a>
4700\u00a0mAh<\/span><\/th>\n		Average<\/span> MediaTek Dimensity 9200<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/th>\n		Average of class<\/span> Smartphone<\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
Power Consumption<\/td>\n<\/td>\n\n

28%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

19%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

24%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

9%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

7%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Idle Minimum *<\/td>\n\n

0.9<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

0.76 <\/p>\n

16%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

0.78 <\/p>\n

13%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

0.8 <\/p>\n

11%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

0.92 <\/p>\n

-2%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

0.9 <\/p>\n

-0%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
Idle Average *<\/td>\n\n

2.32<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

1.1 <\/p>\n

53%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

1.61 <\/p>\n

31%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

1.2 <\/p>\n

48%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

1.76 <\/p>\n

24%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

2.32 <\/p>\n

-0%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
Idle Maximum *<\/td>\n\n

2.39<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

1.13 <\/p>\n

53%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

1.63 <\/p>\n

32%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

1.3 <\/p>\n

46%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

1.88 <\/p>\n

21%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

2.39 <\/p>\n

-0%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
Load Average *<\/td>\n\n

3.64<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

2.99 <\/p>\n

18%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

3.29 <\/p>\n

10%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

3.5 <\/p>\n

4%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

3.65 <\/p>\n

-0%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

3.64 <\/p>\n

-0%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
Load Maximum *<\/td>\n\n

6.53<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

6.63 <\/p>\n

-2%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

6.01 <\/p>\n

8%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

5.9 <\/p>\n

10%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

6.24 <\/p>\n

4%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

6.53 <\/p>\n

-0%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n

\n
\n

7.17 {el.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>?<\/a>(3.56 – 11.9, n=185, last 2 years)<\/span><\/p>\n

-10%<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

* … smaller is better<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n0<\/text>1<\/text>2<\/text>3<\/text>4<\/text>5<\/text>6<\/text>7<\/text>8<\/text>9<\/text>10<\/text>11<\/text>12<\/text>13<\/text>14<\/text>15<\/text><\/g>Tooltip<\/text><\/svg><\/p>\n
\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a> MediaTek Dimensity 9200; Geekbench 5.4: \u00d88.29 (3.35-15.7) <\/span><\/p>\n

Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a> Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Geekbench 5.4: \u00d86.3 (1.574-11.4) <\/span><\/p>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a> MediaTek Dimensity 9200; Idle 150cd\/m2: \u00d83.29 (3.24-3.38) <\/span><\/p>\n

Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a> Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd\/m2: \u00d81.193 (1.109-1.298) <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n0<\/text>1<\/text>2<\/text>3<\/text>4<\/text>5<\/text>6<\/text>7<\/text>8<\/text>9<\/text>10<\/text>11<\/text>12<\/text>13<\/text>14<\/text>15<\/text>16<\/text><\/g>Tooltip<\/text><\/svg><\/p>\n
\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a> MediaTek Dimensity 9200; 1920×1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: \u00d814.8 (12.7-16.8) <\/span><\/p>\n

Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a> Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; 1920×1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: \u00d89.77 (9.38-10.2) <\/span><\/p>\n

Vivo X90 Pro<\/a> MediaTek Dimensity 9200; Idle 150cd\/m2: \u00d83.29 (3.24-3.38) <\/span><\/p>\n

Vivo X90 Pro+<\/a> Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd\/m2: \u00d81.193 (1.109-1.298) <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The X90 Pro lasted a good 15 hours in our WLAN test with an adjusted display brightness of 150 cd\/m2. This is a good rate, which is only surpassed by the Xiaomi 13<\/a> in our comparison.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Pros<\/h3>\n

+<\/span> bright OLED panel
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

+<\/span> fast SoC
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

+<\/span> good workmanship
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

+<\/span> appealing main camera
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

+<\/span> fast charging<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Cons<\/h3>\n

–<\/span> no frugal LTPO panel
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

–<\/span> deteriorations compared to the predecessor
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

–<\/span> ultra wide-angle camera is solid at best
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

–<\/span> high power consumption <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\"In<\/a>
In review: VivoX90 Pro. <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Without the official pricing for Europe, a conclusive assessment of the X90 Pro is difficult. If the Chinese manufacturer’s flagship phone in Europe matches the X80 Pro’s RRP of 1299 Euros, we see a few reasons to buy the predecessor rather than the X90 Pro – especially since a Xiaomi 13 that is better in many areas is much cheaper.<\/p>\n

\n
\n

Whether the X90 Pro can hold its own as a flagship for Europe against a Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra or Xiaomi 13 Pro is highly doubtful.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n

Overall, the X90 Pro is a really good smartphone, but the technical deteriorations compared with the predecessor make it a bit of a relegation. Why the successor of the X80 Pro<\/a> has to accept a downgrade in the ultra-wide-angle camera and zoom lenses, the fingerprint sensor, and the display resolution is incomprehensible. Especially in view of the fact that the X90 Pro is the manufacturer’s European flagship and already has to accept compromises in terms of the SoC compared with the Pro+ model.<\/p>\n

If you really want the best of the best from Vivo, you will have to import the actual high-end smartphone X90 Pro+<\/a>. Besides the Xiaomi 13<\/a>, we also see the Google Pixel 7 Pro <\/a>as a suitable and cheaper alternative to the Vivo X90 Pro. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Vivo has announced the international launch of the Vivo X90 Pro, but no concrete details about the price and availability are known at the moment. However, the predecessor had a slightly lower MSRP in China, so we assume that it will be available for less than 1,300 Euros in this country as well. The X90 Pro can already be purchased via import, for example at Trading Shenzhen, starting at around 780 Euros<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\nVivo X90 Pro<\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n–
\n02\/21\/2023 v7<\/span>
\n<\/span>
\nMarcus Herbrich<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Connectivity<\/p>\n

67\u00a0\/\u00a070<\/span>\u00a0\u2192\u00a095%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Games Performance<\/p>\n

69\u00a0\/\u00a064<\/span>\u00a0\u2192\u00a0100%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Application Performance<\/p>\n

90\u00a0\/\u00a086<\/span>\u00a0\u2192\u00a0100%<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Smartphone<\/span> – Weighted Average<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Transparency<\/h4>\n

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Pricecompare<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n
\"Marcus<\/picture><\/a><\/div>\n

I have always been very passionately interested in mobile technologies, especially smartphones. Being a tech enthusiast means the half-life of my devices isn\u2019t exactly long, and being the latest hardware is not enough to suffice as the manufacturer and operating system play a minor role \u2013 the most important aspect for me is that the device is state-of-the-art. After posting for Mobi Test I joined Notebookcheck in 2016, where I have been pursuing my enthusiasm for technology by reviewing the latest smartphone, tablet, and accessory trends.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\"Ninh<\/picture><\/a><\/div>\n

Translator:<\/i> Ninh Duy<\/a> – Editorial Assistant – 291532 articles published on Notebookcheck<\/span> since 2008<\/p>\n

My main responsibility as an editorial assistant is maintaining the Library section, which aggregates reviews from other publications and channels. In addition, my daily breakfast is Notebookcheck’s long list of new content, which I comb through to select the most interesting topics for translation from English to French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, and Dutch.”<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Marcus Herbrich,\u00a02023-02-26\u00a0(Update:\u00a02023-02-26)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Read More<\/a>
\n Marcus Herbrich<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A questionable upgrade to the X80 Pro. While the Pro+ model of the Vivo X90 series relies on a Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, the X90 Pro uses the new MediaTek Dimensity 9200. Our review will tell how well the chipset performs in everyday use and what shortcomings Vivo X90 Pro has. Marcus Herbrich, ????<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":612433,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[661,2909,46],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-612432","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-review","8":"category-smartphone","9":"category-technology"},"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/612432","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=612432"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/612432\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/612433"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=612432"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=612432"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsycanuse.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=612432"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}