The Nvidia GeForce MX350 is a dedicated entry-level mobile graphics card for laptops. It was released in February 2020 and is based on the same GP107 Pascal chip with 640 shaders as the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 for laptops. The memory bus is cut in half to 64 bit (GDDR5).
First benchmarks however show a bit slower performance as the GTX 1050 and on par with a GTX 960M. Nvidia states on the product page that the MX350 offers 2.5x of the performance of a Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 in an i7-1065G7 (vs 2x for the MX330). Therefore, demanding games of 2019 like The Division 2, Metro Exodus or Rage 2 will only run in lowest detail settings acceptable. Less demanding games like Fifa 20 should run fine in high settings and even 1080p. However, this is always also depending on the used processor and main memory. See below for detailed gaming benchmarks.
The GP107-670-A1 chip is manufactured in a 14 nm FinFET process at Samsung and offers a number of new features, including support for DisplayPort 1.4 (ready), HDMI 2.0b, HDR, Simultaneous Multi-Projection (SMP) as well as improved H.265 video de- and encoding (PlayReady 3.0). A full list of improvements and the new Pascal desktop GPUs is available in our dedicated Pascal architecture article.
In new Nvidia drivers drivers the GeForce MX350 appeared with the hardware ID 1C94.
The power consumption in our tests was lower than the average GTX 1050 (even Max-Q) and similar to the older MX graphics cards (as the TGP of 25 Watt suggests). Therefore, the GPU is suited for thin and light laptops.
GeForce MX300 Series | |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Architecture | Pascal |
| Pipelines | 640 – unified |
| TMUs | 40 |
| ROPs | 16 |
| Core Speed | 1354 – 1468 (Boost) MHz |
| Memory Speed | 7000 effective = 1752 MHz |
| Memory Bus Width | 64 Bit |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| Shared Memory | no |
| Memory Bandwidth | 56.1 GB/s |
| API | DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6 |
| Power Consumption | 25 Watt |
| Transistor Count | 3.3 Billion |
| Die Size | 132 mm² |
| technology | 14 nm |
| PCIe | 3.0 |
| Displays | HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| Features | Vulkan 1.1, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 1.2, GPU Boost 3.0, Multi Monitor, Optimus, PCIe 3.0, GameWorks |
| Date of Announcement | 20.02.2020 |
| Link to Manufacturer Page | https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/gam… |
Benchmarks
Performance Rating – 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3DMark – 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1219 avg: 1465 median: 1491 (5%) max: 1752 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1123 avg: 1322 median: 1335.5 (4%) max: 1595 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 77510 avg: 229394 median: 285166 (33%) max: 306423 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 67621 avg: 77658 median: 79699 (11%) max: 85655 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 11700 avg: 15613 median: 16226 (18%) max: 18419 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 23194 avg: 24858 median: 24744 (8%) max: 26239 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3615 avg: 3975 median: 3985 (7%) max: 4196 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 3999 avg: 4390 median: 4371 (6%) max: 4656 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 80101 avg: 88743 median: 87118 (11%) max: 97898 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 9538 avg: 9739 median: 9837 (5%) max: 9841 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Night Raid
min: 13630 avg: 13846 median: 13845.5 (14%) max: 14061 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 17617 avg: 17916 median: 17916 (7%) max: 18215 Points
3DMark 11 – 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 5099 avg: 6325 median: 6376 (9%) max: 6781 Points
3DMark 11 – 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 5191 avg: 6142 median: 6166 (6%) max: 6540 Points
Power Consumption – The Witcher 3 Power Consumption – external Monitor *
min: 45 avg: 49.2 median: 50.1 (7%) max: 51.5 Watt
Power Consumption – Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 46 avg: 53 median: 54 (12%) max: 59 Watt
Power Consumption – Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.278 avg: 0.3 median: 0.3 (41%) max: 0.3326 Points per Watt
Power Consumption – Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency – external Monitor
min: 0.2834 avg: 0.3 median: 0.3 (0%) max: 0.3333 Points per Watt
Clock Speed – GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
min: 1314 avg: 1404 median: 1403.5 (70%) max: 1493 MHz
Clock Speed – GPU Clock Speed Furmark
min: 987 avg: 1164 median: 1164 (46%) max: 1341 MHz
– Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
– Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
Game Benchmarks
The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don’t have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Prioritize Performance Preset 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920×1080
low 1366×768
med. 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
4K 3840×2160
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Performance 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium (Render Scale 100 %) 2xAF FXAA 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024×768
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920×1080
low 1024×768
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920×1080
Lowest Settings possible 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1366×768
high 1366×768
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024×768
med. 1366×768
high 1366×768
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.22
log 09. 23:41:57
#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by “_”) +0s … 0s
#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s … 0s
#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Feb 2023 15:10:53 +0100 +0.001s … 0.001s
#3 composed specs +0.058s … 0.059s
#4 did output specs +0s … 0.059s
#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s … 0.059s
#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9980 +0.029s … 0.088s
#7 got single benchmarks 9980 +0.052s … 0.14s
#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s … 0.14s
#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.558s … 0.698s
#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s … 0.698s
#11 Got 629 rows for game benchmarks. +0.061s … 0.759s
#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s … 0.759s
#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.045s … 0.804s
#14 benchmarks composed for output. +1.618s … 2.422s
#15 return log +0.055s … 2.476s
Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce MX350 graphics card
Lenovo V17 G2 review: 17-inch laptop with unrewarding MX350
With its 17-inch display, Nvidia graphics, and Intel’s Core i7 CPU, Lenovo’s V17 G2 is well suited for office and multimedia tasks, including simple gaming. Our…
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | 17.30″ | 2.2 kg
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ OLED laptop review: The Lenovo IdeaPad alternative
The VivoBook 15 K513 offers an amazing bang for the buck with its OLED display, 11th gen Intel CPU, and discrete Nvidia graphics all for under $950 USD. Though …
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | 15.60″ | 1.6 kg
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition Laptop Review: Cost-cutting not done right
With the Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition, Xiaomi aims to lower the entry point for a capable multimedia laptop. While the pricing seems right for a Core i7 Comet…
Intel Core i7-10510U | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | 14.00″ | 1.4 kg
Honor MagicBook Pro review: Compact 16.1-inch allrounder with a good battery life
The MagicBook Pro offers a well-rounded level of equipment: a Core i5 processor, a GeForce MX350 GPU, 16 GB of working memory (dual-channel mode), an NVMe SSD, …
Intel Core i5-10210U | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | 16.10″ | 1.7 kg
Dell Inspiron 14 7400 Laptop Review: Portable office laptop with a Tiger Lake CPU
The Inspiron 14 7400 is small and light. It also comes with a superb display. In combination with a Tiger Lake CPU and Nvidia’s GeForce MX350, the Inspiron 14 c…
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | 14.50″ | 1.3 kg
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 17.30″, 2.2 kg
Review » Acer Aspire 5 A517 laptop review: Attractive 17.3-incher with Tiger Lake CPU and MX350 GPU
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
Review » Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ in review: Elegant all-rounder with equipment weaknesses
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00″, 1.5 kg
Review » Huawei MateBook 14 2020 laptop review: 3:2 clamshell convinces both with Intel and AMD CPUs
HP Envy 13-ba0001ng: Intel Core i7-10510U, 13.30″, 1.3 kg
Review » HP Envy 13 Laptop Review: Elegant metal case and solid performance
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00″, 1.4 kg
Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14 laptop review – With Nvidia GPU against AMD
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 15.60″, 1.7 kg
Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05 Review: Good performance and a long battery life – thanks to the 70-Wh battery
MSI Prestige 14 A10RD: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00″
Review » Nvidia GeForce MX330 and MX350 in review: Known architecture – New name
Acer Aspire 5 A514-54G, i3-1115G4 MX350: Intel Core i3-1115G4, 14.00″, 1.7 kg
External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A514-54G, i3-1115G4 MX350
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56G-78TR: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60″, 1.7 kg
External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A515-56G-78TR
MSI Modern 14 B10RBSW-257XFR: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00″, 1.3 kg
External Review » MSI Modern 14 B10RBSW-257XFR
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 17.30″, 2.2 kg
External Review » Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE
Acer Aspire 5 A514-54G-743J: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00″, 1.7 kg
External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A514-54G-743J
Dell Vostro 15 3510, i7-1165G7 MX350: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60″, 1.7 kg
External Review » Dell Vostro 15 3510, i7-1165G7 MX350
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60″, 1.6 kg
External Review » Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ
Asus VivoBook 14 S433JQ-EB166: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 14.00″, 1.5 kg
External Review » Asus VivoBook 14 S433JQ-EB166
Asus VivoBook S14 S433JQ-EB166T: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 14.00″, 1.4 kg
External Review » Asus VivoBook S14 S433JQ-EB166T
Acer Aspire 5 A514-54G-58R8: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 14.00″, 1.7 kg
External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A514-54G-58R8
Asus VivoBook Ultra 14 K413EQ-EK115T: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00″
External Review » Asus VivoBook Ultra 14 K413EQ-EK115T
HP Pavilion 14-dv0006ns: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 14.00″, 1.4 kg
External Review » HP Pavilion 14-dv0006ns
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55GT-72L0: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00″, 1.1 kg
External Review » Acer Swift 5 SF514-55GT-72L0
Honor MagicBook Pro 10210U: Intel Core i5-10210U, 16.10″, 1.7 kg
External Review » Honor MagicBook Pro 10210U
Asus VivoBook S14 S433JQ-EB163: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 14.00″, 1.4 kg
External Review » Asus VivoBook S14 S433JQ-EB163
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56G-51YF: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 15.60″, 1.7 kg
External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A515-56G-51YF
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7 14IIL05-82A4000MUS: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 14.00″, 1.5 kg
External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7 14IIL05-82A4000MUS
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IIL05-82A10076GE: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 14.00″, 1.5 kg
External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IIL05-82A10076GE
MSI Modern 14 B10RBSW-064XES: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00″, 1.3 kg
External Review » MSI Modern 14 B10RBSW-064XES
Acer Swift 5 SF514-55GT-79BM: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00″, 1 kg
External Review » Acer Swift 5 SF514-55GT-79BM
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
External Review » Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Acer Book RS Porsche Design AP714-51GT-71A4: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00″, 1.3 kg
External Review » Acer Book RS Porsche Design AP714-51GT-71A4
Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 14IIL05: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00″, 1.6 kg
External Review » Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 14IIL05
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00″, 1.5 kg
External Review » Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel
HP Envy 13-ba0004ns: Intel Core i7-10510U, 13.30″, 1.3 kg
External Review » HP Envy 13-ba0004ns
Asus VivoBook S14 S433JQ i5-1035G1: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 14.00″, 1.5 kg
External Review » Asus VivoBook S14 S433JQ i5-1035G1
Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5i 15IIL05-81YK003SHH: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 15.60″, 1.7 kg
External Review » Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5i 15IIL05-81YK003SHH
Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 i7-1065G7, MX350: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 16.10″, 1.8 kg
External Review » Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 i7-1065G7, MX350
Huawei MateBook 14 KLVC-WFE9L: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00″, 1.5 kg
External Review » Huawei MateBook 14 KLVC-WFE9L
Huawei MateBook 14 (2020): Intel Core i5-10210U, 14.00″, 1.5 kg
External Review » Huawei MateBook 14 (2020)
Asus ZenBook 14 Q407IQ: AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, 14.00″, 1.2 kg
External Review » Asus ZenBook 14 Q407IQ
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 15.60″, 1.7 kg
External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00″, 1.4 kg
External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05
HP Envy 13-ba0005ns: Intel Core i7-10510U, 13.30″, 1.3 kg
External Review » HP Envy 13-ba0005ns
Acer Swift 5 SF514-54GT-72NT: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00″, 1 kg
External Review » Acer Swift 5 SF514-54GT-72NT
Acer Aspire A514-53G-55A8: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 14.00″, 1.6 kg
External Review » Acer Aspire A514-53G-55A8
Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon Edition: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00″, 1.4 kg
External Review » Xiaomi Mi NoteBook 14 Horizon, i7-10510U
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52G-54JU: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 13.50″, 1.2 kg
External Review » Acer Swift 3 SF313-52G-54JU
Asus ZenBook 14 UM433IQ-A5026T: AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, 14.00″, 1.2 kg
External Review » Asus ZenBook 14 UM433IQ-A5026T
Lenovo V17 G2 ITL-82NX00EUGE: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 17.30″, 2.2 kg
» Lenovo V17 G2 reviewed: The 17-inch laptop is affordable when going without the MX350
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60″, 1.6 kg
» 2021 Asus VivoBook 15 sets a new display standard for budget laptops with its outstanding 1080p OLED panel
Honor MagicBook Pro 10210U: Intel Core i5-10210U, 16.10″, 1.7 kg
» Honor MagicBook Pro with AMD or Intel/Nvidia?
Dell Inspiron 14 7400-VY8JW: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.50″, 1.3 kg
» Dell Inspiron 14 7400: Tiger Lake processor plus a good screen equals a great laptop
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
» The Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ comes with a Thunderbolt 4 port
Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00″, 1.5 kg
» Outdated Comet Lake CPU in the Huawei MateBook 14 is only convincing when it comes to battery life
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00″, 1.4 kg
» The Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14 with the Nvidia GPU is better for gaming
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 15.60″, 1.7 kg
» The Lenovo Ideapad 5 15IIL05 comes close to entry-level gaming notebooks with its GeForce MX350 GPU