
The Nvidia GeForce MX450 (N18S-G5, N18S-G5-B, N18S-LP codename) is a dedicated entry-level mobile graphics card for laptops. It uses the same TU117 chip as the GeForce GTX 1650 but with a reduced memory bus of 64 Bit. Furthermore, the MX450 is the first mobile GPU with PCIe Gen 4 x4 support.
Currently four different versions are available with different specifications and performance:
N18S-G5-B: GBD-128 Package, 1395 – 1575 MHz, GDDR6 5001 MHz, 28.5 W
N18S-G5: GB2E-64 Package, 1395 – 1575 MHz, GDDR6 5001 MHz, 25 W
N18S-G5: GB2E-64 Package, 1395 – 1575 MHz, GDDR5 3501 MHz, 25 W
N18S-LP: GB2E-64 Package, 720 – 930 MHz, GDDR6 5001 MHz, 12 W
Especially the LP = Low Power variant is significantly slower than the typical 25 Watt variant.
The 25 Watt GDDR6 N18S-G5 should be up to 20% faster than a GeForce GTX 1050 but of course below a GTX 1650 (Max-Q). Therefore, demanding games like Horizon Zero Dawn should run lowest settings. Less demanding games like F1 2020 can be played in medium to high settings and full HD.
The TU117 chip is manufactured in 12nm at TSMC and thanks to the relatively low power consumption (TGP specified between 12 and 28.5 W) the dGPU is also suited for thin and light laptops. Mostly it is intended as an additional graphics card for Tiger Lake-U based laptops.
GeForce MX300 Series | |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Architecture | Turing |
| Pipelines | 896 – unified |
| TMUs | 56 |
| ROPs | 16 |
| Core Speed | 1395 – 1575 (Boost) MHz |
| Memory Speed | 10000 effective = 1250 MHz |
| Memory Bus Width | 64 Bit |
| Memory Type | GDDR5, GDDR6 |
| Max. Amount of Memory | 2048 MB |
| Shared Memory | no |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s |
| API | DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6 |
| Power Consumption | 25 Watt (12 – 29 Watt TGP) |
| Transistor Count | 4.7 Billion |
| Die Size | 200 mm² |
| technology | 12 nm |
| PCIe | 4.0 |
| Features | Vulkan 1.1, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 1.2, GPU Boost 3.0, Multi Monitor, Optimus, PCIe 3.0, GameWorks |
| Date of Announcement | 01.08.2020 |
Benchmarks
Performance Rating – 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3DMark – 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1204 avg: 1995 median: 2099 (6%) max: 2586 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1086 avg: 1796 median: 1900 (5%) max: 2300 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 302347 avg: 330908 median: 335125 (39%) max: 365909 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 29368 avg: 50045 median: 48270.5 (7%) max: 85281 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 14229 avg: 18957 median: 18399 (20%) max: 27571 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 25467 avg: 29167 median: 27570 (9%) max: 33806 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 4131 avg: 4649 median: 4306 (8%) max: 6833 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 4336 avg: 4869 median: 4725 (7%) max: 5753 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 29374 avg: 57100 median: 54872.5 (7%) max: 88274 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 11448 avg: 13149 median: 12794.5 (6%) max: 15557 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3693 avg: 4040 median: 3830 (4%) max: 4597 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 20702 avg: 20744 median: 20743.5 (8%) max: 20785 Points
3DMark 11 – 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 6745 avg: 8101 median: 8068 (12%) max: 9885 Points
3DMark 11 – 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 6341 avg: 8129 median: 8250 (8%) max: 9580 Points
Power Consumption – The Witcher 3 Power Consumption – external Monitor *
min: 36.4 avg: 54 median: 53.4 (7%) max: 69.7 Watt
Power Consumption – Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 39.2 avg: 56 median: 55.6 (12%) max: 73.5 Watt
Power Consumption – Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.2829 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (52%) max: 0.571 Points per Watt
Power Consumption – Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency – external Monitor
min: 0.2984 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (0%) max: 0.627 Points per Watt
Clock Speed – GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
min: 1039 avg: 1292 median: 1292 (65%) max: 1545 MHz
Clock Speed – GPU Clock Speed Furmark
min: 879 avg: 1228 median: 1228 (49%) max: 1577 MHz
– Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
– Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
Game Benchmarks
The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don’t have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset / Off 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (without FSR Upscaling) 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Basic Quality Preset T2X SMAA 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Rendering Quality 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Settings 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low / Off 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Quality 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset (with Fixed Resolution Quality) 1280×720
low 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280×720
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (DX12) 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Rendering Quality 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Video Quality 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Prioritize Performance Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low-End TAAAA 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920×1080
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
4K 3840×2160
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024×768
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920×1080
low 1024×768
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920×1080
Lowest Settings possible 1920×1080
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.22
log 11. 08:24:51
#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by “_”) +0s … 0s
#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s … 0s
#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Feb 2023 15:10:53 +0100 +0.001s … 0.001s
#3 composed specs +0.075s … 0.076s
#4 did output specs +0s … 0.076s
#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s … 0.076s
#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10349 +0.026s … 0.101s
#7 got single benchmarks 10349 +0.062s … 0.163s
#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s … 0.163s
#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.61s … 0.773s
#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s … 0.774s
#11 Got 830 rows for game benchmarks. +0.104s … 0.878s
#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s … 0.878s
#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.05s … 0.928s
#14 benchmarks composed for output. +1.706s … 2.633s
#15 return log +0.047s … 2.68s
Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce MX450 graphics card

The GeForce MX450 is falling behind: Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U convertible review
An AMD Zen + Nvidia MX ultrabook sounded nice a few years ago, but it’s too little too late now that Zen 3+ CPUs are available with the faster, smaller, and mor…
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | 15.60″ | 1.9 kg

Asus ZenBook 14X OLED Review: Games & Strong 3K Colors
Asus has gone the extra mile: The 14-incher combines the easily adjustable graphics performance of an MX450 with a scalable Tiger Lake Core i7. On top of that, …
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | 14.00″ | 1.4 kg

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED review: A subnotebook with a lot of CPU power
Optionally, Lenovo also offers its compact 14-inch Yoga Slim 7 Pro subnotebook with an OLED display and dedicated GeForce MX450. At the same time, you also don’…
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | 14.00″ | 1.4 kg

Asus Zenbook 14X OLED pre-production unit review: That’s some punchy colors!
The 14-inch laptop from Asus combines a stunning OLED display with a first-class case that is both sturdy and high-quality. Performance should also be great tha…
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | 14.00″ | 1.4 kg

Dell Inspiron 15 5518 laptop in review: The CPU is slowed down
The Inspiron 15 5518 offers a Core i5-11300H processor, a GeForce-MX450 GPU and 8 GB of working memory. The latter works in single-channel mode. Positive: The n…
Intel Core i5-11300H | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | 15.60″ | 1.8 kg
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J: Intel Core i5-11300H, 13.30″, 1.3 kg
Review » Dell Inspiron 13 5310 review: More graphics, more battery life
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6: Intel Core i5-11300H, 16.00″, 1.9 kg
Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 in review: 16-inch all-rounder with good battery life
HP Envy 17-cg: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 17.30″, 2.7 kg
Review » HP Envy 17 cg1356ng review: A large multimedia laptop
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00″, 1.3 kg
Review » MSI Modern 14 B11SB review: 14-inch allrounder suffers from heat development
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15: Intel Core i7-11370H, 15.60″, 1.7 kg
Review » Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 (2021) in review: Affordable laptop with strong features
HP Pavilion 15-eg: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60″, 1.7 kg
Review » HP Pavilion 15 (2021) Laptop Review: 11th Gen Intel and GeForce MX450 Combo
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 13.30″, 1.3 kg
Review » HP Envy 13 with Intel Tiger Lake and GeForce MX450 in review
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen2-20W1S00000: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00″, 1.5 kg
Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 2 laptop review: Familiar benefits from Intel Tiger Lake
Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen2-20W5S00100: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60″, 1.9 kg
Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen2 laptop in review: Business combined with media GPU and Tiger Lake
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
Review » Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen 2 Review: Tiger Lake laptop with an Nvidia GeForce MX450
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00″, 1.3 kg
Review » Asus ZenBook 14 UX435EG Review: A compact, mobile multimedia allrounder with an unnecessary touchscreen
HP Envy 17-ch1056nf: Intel Core i7-1195G7, 17.30″, 2.5 kg
External Review » HP Envy 17-ch1056nf
Dell Inspiron 15 5510, i7-11390H MX450: Intel Core i7-11390H, 15.60″, 0 kg
External Review » Dell Inspiron 15 5510, i7-11390H MX450
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-NP37P: Intel Core i5-11320H, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
External Review » Dell Inspiron 15 5518-NP37P
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14IHU5-82NH002QGE: Intel Core i7-11370H, 14.00″, 1.4 kg
External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14IHU5-82NH002QGE
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-59GP: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 17.30″, 2.6 kg
External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-59GP
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9: AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, 14.00″, 1.4 kg
External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9
Dell Latitude 15 5521, i5-11500H MX450: Intel Core i5-11500H, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
External Review » Dell Latitude 15 5521, i5-11500H MX450
MSI Modern 14 B11SB, i5-1135G7 MX450: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 14.00″, 1.3 kg
External Review » MSI Modern 14 B11SB, i5-1135G7 MX450
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400EG, i5-1135G7: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 14.00″, 1.4 kg
External Review » Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400EG, i5-1135G7
HP Envy 13-ba1002ns: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 13.30″, 1.3 kg
External Review » HP Envy 13-ba1002ns
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Carbon 14ACN6, 5800U: AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, 14.00″, 1.1 kg
External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Carbon 14ACN-6, 5800U
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ARH5-82NK001PSB: AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, 14.00″, 1.3 kg
External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ARH5-82NK001PSB
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00″, 1.4 kg
External Review » Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E
HP Envy 13-ba1012ns: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 13.30″, 1.3 kg
External Review » HP Envy 13-ba1012ns
HP Pavilion 15-eg0006ns: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
External Review » HP Pavilion 15-eg0006ns
HP Pavilion 15-eg0007ns: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
External Review » HP Pavilion 15-eg0007ns
HP Envy 17-ch0000ns: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 17.30″, 2.5 kg
External Review » HP Envy 17-ch0000ns
MSI Prestige 15 A11SB-449: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 15.60″, 1.7 kg
External Review » MSI Prestige 15 A11SB-449
HP Pavilion 15-eg: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60″, 1.7 kg
External Review » HP Pavilion 15-eg0025cl
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-008ES: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00″, 1.3 kg
External Review » MSI Modern 14 B11SB-008ES
MSI Modern 15 A11SB-011ES: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60″, 1.6 kg
External Review » MSI Modern 15 A11SB-011ES
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro 15, i5-11300H MX450: Intel Core i5-11300H, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
External Review » Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro 15, i5-11300H MX450
HP Envy 17-cg1000ns: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 17.30″
External Review » HP Envy 17-cg1000ns
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2021, i7-1165G7 MX450: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00″, 1.5 kg
External Review » Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2021, i7-1165G7 MX450
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15, i5-11300H MX450: Intel Core i5-11300H, 15.60″, 1.7 kg
External Review » Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15, i5-11300H MX450
HP Pavilion 14-dv0005ns: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00″, 1.4 kg
External Review » HP Pavilion 14-dv0005ns
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ITL05-82FE005QGE: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00″
External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ITL05-82FE005QGE
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-009XES: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00″, 1.3 kg
External Review » MSI Modern 14 B11SB-009XES
HP Envy 13-ba1033tx: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 13.30″, 1.3 kg
External Review » HP Envy 13-ba1033tx
HP Pavilion 14-dv0065tx: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 14.00″, 1.4 kg
External Review » HP Pavilion 14-dv0065tx
HP Pavilion 14-dv0067tx: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00″, 1.5 kg
External Review » HP Pavilion 14-dv0067tx
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00″, 1.5 kg
External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro
HP Envy 17-cg1490nd : Intel Core i7-1165G7, 17.30″, 2.8 kg
External Review » HP Envy 17-cg1490nd
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00″, 1.3 kg
External Review » Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
MSI Modern 15 A11SB-039RU: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60″, 1.6 kg
External Review » MSI Modern 15 A11SB-039RU
HP Envy 17-cg1279ng: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 17.30″, 2.7 kg
External Review » HP Envy 17-cg1279ng
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U: AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, 15.60″, 1.9 kg
» The Nvidia GeForce MX series is struggling against the AMD Radeon 680M
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00″, 1.4 kg
» Fast MX450 & Flawless OLED: Asus ZenBook 14X Review
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9: AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, 14.00″, 1.4 kg
» Intel’s Alder Lake is slower than AMD’s Cezanne Zen 3 at 45W TDP
Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00″, 1.4 kg
» Asus Zenbook 14X OLED: Vibrant display, weak long-term performance
Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J: Intel Core i5-11300H, 13.30″, 1.3 kg
» Overextended cooling: The Dell Inspiron 13 5310
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6: Intel Core i5-11300H, 16.00″, 1.9 kg
» First place among GeForce MX450 laptops
HP Envy 17-cg: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 17.30″, 2.7 kg
» HP Envy 17 cg1356ng: A multimedia office allrounder
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00″, 1.3 kg
» For 1200 Euros (~$1420), MSI only offers working memory in single-channel mode
HP Pavilion 15-eg: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60″, 1.7 kg
» Nvidia gave laptop makers a useless overblown GeForce MX450 3DMark score that has proven impossible to reach
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
» Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen 2: Who would like some Intel, who needs AMD?
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00″, 1.3 kg
» 12-Watt GeForce MX450 beats the 25-Watt GeForce-MX350 – Testing the Asus ZenBook 14 UX435EG














































































